Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Forms
HR Seminars
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Enter Your Email Address Below!

Daily Weekly  [More Information]
Article Index » human resources » drugs & alcohol » Drug Testing
Report Link Pre-Employment Drug Test Deemed Unconstitutional.
Barker Olmsted & Barnier - April 15, 2008
The waters have been muddied—somewhat--on the issue of drug testing applicants and employees. The legal right to drug test has always suffered from a bit of murkiness on account of ill-defined constitutional privacy rights. Will a recent federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal case complicate matters?
Report Link Public Employers: Drug Screening All Applicants Held Unconstitutional.
Ford & Harrison LLP - April 15, 2008
The Ninth Circuit recently held that a city’s policy of requiring candidates of choice for city positions to pass a pre-employment drug test as a condition of the job offer is unconstitutional as applied to an applicant for the position of library page. See Lanier v. City of Woodburn (March 13, 2008). The court held that the city failed to demonstrate a special need to screen prospective library pages for drugs, thus the policy is unconstitutional as applied to that position. The court also held, however, that the plaintiff did not show that the policy could never be constitutionally applied to any city position, thus it was not unconstitutional on its face.
Report Link Court Upholds FAA Rule Requiring Drug and Alcohol Testing of Air Carrier Contractors and Subcontractors at Any Tier.
Jackson Lewis LLP - August 09, 2007
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., has upheld an FAA rule requiring air carriers to conduct drug and alcohol testing of all employees of their contractors who perform safety-sensitive work, including employees of subcontractors at any tier. Aeronautical Repair Station Ass'n v. FAA, No. 06-1091, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16920 (D.C. Cir., July 17, 2007).
Report Link Survey Shows Most Drug and Alcohol Abusers Work Full-Time, Are More Likely to Work For Employers That Do Not Test.
Jackson Lewis LLP - August 08, 2007
A link between the absence of employer substance abuse testing and the incidence of abusing employees in the workforce appears to emerge from a study recently released by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration ("SAMHSA"), a division of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. The results of a nationwide survey conducted in 2002-2004 concerning workplace substance abuse issues, entitled "Worker Substance Use and Workplace Policies and Programs," was based on data collected from a sample of 128,000 people employed full-time, ages 18 to 64, who participated in SAMHSA's National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The survey, released on July 16, 2007, underscores the fact that use of illicit drugs and alcohol in the workplace is widespread. Some of the survey's more significant highlights for employers include the following:
Report Link Termination of Public Employee For Refusing to Submit to Drug Testing Upheld By Federal Appellate Court.
Jackson Lewis LLP - April 02, 2007
Does a random drug test violate a public employee's 4th Amendment right againt unreasonable searches?
Report Link States Enact Ten New Drug Testing Laws in 2005.
Jackson Lewis LLP - May 05, 2006
While the 2006 legislative calendar is just now gearing up at the state level, this may be a good time to review the ten newly enacted state laws affecting workplace drug testing from the 2005 legislative session.
Report Link Employee Dishonesty After Drug-Related Arrest Provides Grounds For Drug Testing.
Jackson Lewis LLP - December 28, 2004
An employee's arrest for possession of drug paraphernalia and criminal trespass, together with his dishonesty in explaining his resulting absence from work, was sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion that he was using drugs illicitly.
Report Link Proposal to Revise Mandatory Federal Drug Testing Guidelines for Hair, Sweat and Oral Fluids.
Jackson Lewis LLP - April 27, 2004
On April 13, 2004, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced a proposal to revise its Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs to establish guidelines for the testing of hair, oral fluid and sweat specimens for drugs, in addition to urine.
Report Link Hospital May Be Liable to Client's Employee for Mishandling Drug Test.
Jackson Lewis LLP - September 18, 2003
A hospital which collected urine samples for drug testing under a contract with an employer owes a duty of care to the employee being tested.
Report Link Practical Issues for Employers to Consider When Creating a Substance Abuse Testing Program.
Jackson Lewis LLP - April 01, 2002
Before implementing a workplace drug and/or alcohol testing program, employers should carefully consider a number of issues.
Report Link drug and alcohol testing: is your policy up-to-date?
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. - April 01, 2002
Regardless of the reason for drug and/or alcohol testing, employers must ensure that they comply with the applicable federal and state laws or risk substantial monetary penalties.
Report Link Intro to Drug Screening...
Pre-Employment Drug Screening - (No Date)
General discussion about drug testing, including testing programs, testing methods, testing results.
Report Link Drug Testing Resource Site.
Drug Free Workplace (SAMHSA) - (No Date)
Covers extensive list of topics relating to drug testing, including urine testing, specimen collection, policy issues, medical review officers, specimen validity testing, and analytical testing.

Articles

Found: 13 Articles

NO SUBTOPICS

Sort Articles   
  
Employment Law Seminars

Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.