list in directory join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corp (9th Cir. 2009)

Articles Discussing Case:

ADA Update: Fitness For Duty Exam Tangles Employer In ADA Violation.

Barker Olmsted & Barnier • October 05, 2009
Under the ADA, an employer may not require a current employee to undergo a medical examination unless the examination “is shown to be job-related and consistent with business necessity.” This rule applies to all employees, whether or not they are disabled under the ADA. Confusion persists, however, over what “counts” as a medical examination. A recent Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals case titled Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. examined the issue and applied a very liberal standard.
Browse By Plaintiff/Appellant

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Browse By Court

Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password?I Want To Participate!