MINNEAPOLIS -- A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by nine former University of Minnesota football players who were accused of sexual assault in 2016 in a case that roiled the school's football program.
The lawsuit against the school claimed that the players faced emotional distress and financial damage after being falsely accused of being sex offenders. The players, who were identified in the lawsuit as John Does, sought unspecified damages for willful and malicious discrimination.
A woman alleged up to a dozen football players raped her or watched and cheered at an off-campus party in 2016. None of the players were ever charged.
The university found that 10 football players committed sexual misconduct. Five of them were expelled or suspended for violating student conduct codes, and the others were cleared on appeal.
In their lawsuit, the players alleged that the woman initiated the sexual encounters with players and an underage recruit.
U.S. District Court Judge Donovan Frank dismissed the lawsuit last week, saying the former players did not prove any of their claims, including allegations of bias by university investigators or pressure from athletic director Mark Coyle and former president Eric Kaler, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported.
David Madgett, an attorney for the players, said Tuesday that they are considering an appeal but have to determine if it makes sense financially and in terms of letting the former players get on with their lives. He said it was disappointing that the outcome was determined by the judge's version of events and not decided by a jury.
"It's disappointing to see disputes decided in this way," Madgett said. "That's the way things are decided more and more these days. ... It's disappointing you don't get your day in court."
When the allegations became public in 2016, players threatened to boycott the team's trip to the Holiday Bowl. But after a graphic report of the investigation was released, the players agreed to play in the game.
University of Minnesota spokesperson Jake Ricker said the school appreciated the judge's decision affirming the actions taken in the case. He said the university would continue its work focusing on sexual misconduct awareness, prevention and response.
Frank dismissed the lawsuit in 2019, but an appeals court reinstated part of it in 2021 and returned it to Frank.
The players, all of whom are Black, also initially claimed racial discrimination, but that claim was previously dismissed.
The only remaining claim alleged Title IX gender discrimination. The former players noted that they never faced criminal charges, but Frank's ruling said that "is certainly not evidence of a judicial adjudication or that plaintiffs 'were proven innocent.'"
The men also claimed that an investigator for the university's Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action used "manipulative tactics" with them in interviews and that their accuser helped draft the report. The players also alleged that "prior failed investigations motivated" the the school to punish them.
Frank said all the claims were unsupported by the evidence and "no reasonable jury could find that the University disciplined plaintiffs on the basis of sex."