• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Affiliate Login
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Lawyer Directory
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Our Feeds

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice
Daily Newsletter
Weekly Newsletter
California Newsletter
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Home > State Law Articles > Virginia

Articles About Virginia Labor And Employment Law.

Federal Court Rules that Virginia’s Laws Barring Same-Sex Marriage are Unconstitutional

February 20, 2014 Filed Under: General (VA)

Littler

On February 13, 2014, in Bostic v. Rainey, Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruled that any Virginia laws banning same-sex marriage or prohibiting recognition of same-sex marriages – including Article I, Section 15-A of the Virginia Constitution and Sections 20-45.2 and 20-45.3 of the Virginia Code – are unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. If upheld, the ruling, in conjunction with the Supreme Court’s decision in Windsor v. United States, means that Virginia employees who choose to marry a person of the same sex would now have the benefit of spousal status under both state and federal law for the purposes of medical plan coverage, 401(k) and retirement plans, and entitlement to leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).

Virginia Supreme Court Reverses Dismissal of Non-Compete Case, Emphasizing Need for Case-by-Case Analysis

September 26, 2013 Filed Under: General (VA)

Littler

In Assurance Data, Inc. v. John Malyevac, No. 121989 (Sept. 12, 2013), the Supreme Court of Virginia held that the Fairfax County Circuit Court had been too quick to rule on the enforceability of a covenant not to compete, reversing the court’s dismissal of the employer’s complaint and remanding the case to the trial court. This ruling signals an important shift in the procedural and strategic landscape surrounding non-compete agreements in the Commonwealth, as the court has effectively limited a frequently used device for challenging and disposing of non-compete claims early in litigation.

New Employee Privacy and Union Voting Rights Laws in Virginia Go Into Effect July 2013

May 20, 2013 Filed Under: General (VA)

Littler

Virginia has enacted two new laws that are intended to enhance employee protections, particularly during union organizing drives in the Commonwealth. One law guarantees the right to vote in a secret ballot election. The other law limits those situations in which an employer may be required to disclose certain information to third parties about current and former employees. Both laws, which are effective July 1, 2013, were spearheaded by Delegate Barbara Comstock, who characterized them as “…a victory for the rights of workers and for protecting employees in the workplace.”

The Virginia Supreme Court on Damages, Equity Valuation, and the Significance of Delaware Corporations Law in the Termination and Removal of a Chairman and CEO

February 4, 2013 Filed Under: General (VA)

Littler

The Virginia Supreme Court has spoken again on the calculation of damages in a complex employment contract case. In Online Resources Corp. v. Lawlor, No. 120208 (Va. Jan. 10, 2013), the court addressed the expert qualifications required for the valuation of equity following the termination of the chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) (“executive”) of a publicly-traded company, as well as the applicability of Delaware Corporations Law to related change in control (CIC) provisions.

Federal Court Finds Choice of Law that Permits Blue Penciling Does Not Violate Virginia Public Policy

January 25, 2013 Filed Under: Restrictive Covenants (VA)

Littler

Non-compete restrictions are creations of state law, which can sometimes vary on key aspects of contract formation and enforceability. One of those aspects is the extent to which states will reform or “blue pencil” the language of the restrictions. In many states a court will rewrite the terms of the restrictions to make them reasonable, thus fulfilling the parties’ contractual intent. Courts in other states refuse to tamper with a restriction’s language, requiring the non-competes to rise or fall on their literal terms.

Supreme Court of Virginia Defines Damages Calculation for Breach of Noncompete

November 27, 2012 Filed Under: Restrictive Covenants (VA)

Littler

In Preferred Systems Solutions, Inc. v. GP Consulting, LLC, Nos. 11906, 11907 (Sept. 14, 2012), the Supreme Court of Virginia, for the first time, defined how to calculate damages for the breach of a noncompete provision where the breach resulted in the loss of an expected contract

Virginia Recognizes Individual Liability for Wrongful Discharge

November 13, 2012 Filed Under: General (VA)

Littler

In VanBuren v. Grubb, No. 120348 (Nov. 1, 2012), a sharply divided Supreme Court of Virginia surprised employers by holding that a common law tort action for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy may be brought against an individual manager or supervisor.

Virginia Supreme Court Rules Individuals Can Be Sued for Public Policy Wrongful Discharge

November 12, 2012 Filed Under: General (VA)

Jackson Lewis

In a case of first impression, the Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that supervisors and managers can be held individually liable for public policy wrongful discharge under Virginia common law. In VanBuren v. Grubb, No. 120348 (Nov. 1, 2012), the Court held that a former employee of a medical practice could sue her former supervisor individually after he allegedly discharged her for refusing his sexual advances.

Virginia Court Overturns Damage Award in Trade Secrets Case for Insufficient Evidence of Lost Market Value

June 20, 2012 Filed Under: Restrictive Covenants (VA)

Littler

In a recent Virginia trade secrets case, the appellate court’s ruling illustrates that in any case for damages, the manner and measure of valuation is paramount. In 21st Century Systems, Inc. v. Perot Systems Government Services, Inc., a Virginia jury awarded Perot Systems Government Services, Inc. (Perot) $3,743,843 in damages for lost goodwill from actions by 21st Century Systems, Inc. (21CSI) and former Perot employees that Perot characterized as tortious interference with contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and misuse of confidential information. The goodwill award was trebled to $11,228,529.

Non-Compete Agreement Barring Work for Competitor “In Any Capacity Whatsoever” Unenforceable in Virginia

December 23, 2011 Filed Under: Restrictive Covenants (VA)

Jackson Lewis

Finding a non-compete provision in an employment agreement overbroad on its face and therefore unenforceable, the Supreme Court of Virginia has affirmed dismissal of an employer’s breach of contract claim against a former employee. Home Paramount Pest Control Cos., Inc. v. Shaffer, 2011 Va. LEXIS 222 (Va. Nov. 4, 2011). While acknowledging that it was invalidating a provision that was identical to one it had enforced for the same employer more than 20 years earlier, the Court said the Virginia law on non-competes has evolved since then and overruled conflicting portions of its 1989 opinion.

Virginia Supreme Court Further Narrows Non-Compete Covenant Enforceability

December 20, 2011 Filed Under: Restrictive Covenants (VA)

Littler

In Home Paramount Pest Control Cos. v. Shaffer, No. 101837, 2011 Va. LEXIS 222 (Nov. 4, 2011), the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that a covenant not to compete was overbroad and unenforceable, even though it was identical to a covenant the court had upheld 22 years earlier in Paramount Termite Control Co. v. Rector, 238 Va. 171 (1989). Acknowledging this, the court expressly overruled its holding in Paramount Termite.

Virginia Supreme Court Refuses to Relax Standard for Tortious Interference with Employment Contract

June 20, 2011 Filed Under: General (VA)

Jackson Lewis

An at-will employee must show a customer used “improper methods” beyond merely “actions solely motivated by spite, ill will and malice” to prove her employer’s primary customer tortiously interfered with her employment contract, the Virginia Supreme Court has ruled. The Court reversed a jury verdict awarding $900,000 in damages to a doctor for tortious interference, finding the pressure inherent in her employer’s relationship with its customer and primary source of revenue cannot rise to the level of “improper methods” needed for an at-will employee to show that the third party tortiously interfered with her employment contract.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8

Primary Sidebar

Virginia Index

  • General (VA)
  • Restrictive Covenants (VA)

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

October 2023
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 
« Sep    

Trending Content

  • Reminder: October 1 New Requirements For Considering Criminal History in Employment
  • Andrew Maunz Discusses Potential Impact of Federal Government Shutdown on EEOC Charges
  • Dismantling Gender Walls in the Construction Industry
  • Federal Court Upholds DOL’s Authority to Set Minimum-Salary Test for White-Collar Exemption
  • Nathan J. Milner Tackles Fraudulent New York Workers’ Comp Claims in CLM Magazine
  • Employers Beware – Deadline for Payment of Arbitration Fees Strictly Construed
  • Work Advice: Reentering a profession after years in a low-stress job
  • Drivers and Dealers Could Soon Feel Impact of U.A.W. Strikes
  • 3 Ways to Prepare for the Future of Work
  • Pregnant Workers Fairness Act will actually hurt women in the workplace

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Footer

Tags

ABC News (64) Axios (44) BBC (51) Benefits Pro (34) Bloomberg (418) Business Insider (96) CBS News (87) CNBC (240) CNN (137) EEOC (404) Entrepreneur (86) Evil HR Lady (633) Fast Company (161) Forbes (1114) Fortune (127) Fox News (36) Harvard Business Review (885) HR Dive (40) Inc. (120) Law.com (41) Littler (43) MarketWatch (33) MSN (141) NBC (62) NBC News (43) Newsweek (31) New York City (71) New York Post (68) New York Times (1101) NPR (167) Politico (53) Power At Work (66) Psychology Today (34) Reuters (170) Richmond Times Dispatch (32) Seattle Times (33) SHRM (289) The Guardian (81) TIME (38) USA Today (102) US News (81) Wall Street Journal (441) Washington Post (268) Yahoo! Finance (30) Yahoo! News (122)

Navigation

  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Log In

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC • P.O. Box 45, Chinchilla, PA 18410 • 570-301-6277 • info@elinfonet.com