• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Affiliate Login
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Lawyer Directory
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Our Feeds

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice
Daily Newsletter
Weekly Newsletter
California Newsletter
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Home > State Law Articles > California

Articles about California Labor And Employment Law.

Court Finds One Plaintiff Not Owed Reporting Time or Split Shift Pay For Scheduled Meetings and Finds Second Plaintiff Waived Claims – But Employer Denied Award of Fees!

December 30, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: Wage & Hour (CA)

Littler

In Aleman v. Airtouch Cellular, a California Court of Appeal ruled on December 21, 2011 that one class representative was not entitled to additional reporting pay or split shift premiums and a second class representative could not pursue such claims because she had signed a release in exchange for enhanced severance compensation. The court did, however, reverse the award of attorneys’ fees to the employer.

Ninth Circuit Unconvinced that Out-of-State Employee Claims Are Invalid

December 29, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: Wage & Hour (CA)

Littler

On December 13, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reconsidered the case, Sullivan v. Oracle Corp., after the California Supreme Court had decided several certified questions of law. The Ninth Circuit had previously delayed ruling, and instead asked the California Supreme Court to decide three questions of California law, including whether a company with its principal place of business in California was required to pay out-of-state employees temporarily working in California according to California’s daily overtime rules.

Teacher Can’t Sue Church School for FEHA Violations

December 27, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: Employment At-Will (CA)

Littler

A California Court of Appeal has ruled that a religious school teacher who was living “out of wedlock” with her boyfriend as they raised their child cannot state a claim against the church for wrongful termination based upon marital status discrimination. Henry v. Red Hill Evangelical Lutheran Church of Tustin, No. G044556 (Fourth Dist., Div. Three Dec. 9, 2011).

Nonresident-Employees Working in California Entitled to Overtime under State Law, Ninth Circuit Rules

December 22, 2011 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Wage & Hour (CA)

Jackson Lewis

Nonresidents of California are entitled to overtime pay under California law for work performed in California, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled, following the California Supreme Court’s responses to its questions on state law. Sullivan v. Oracle Corp., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 24625 (9th Cir. Dec. 13, 2011). The Ninth Circuit reversed summary judgment in favor of the employer on claims for unpaid overtime under the California Labor Code (“Labor Code”), as well as on claims under the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), which were predicated on the Labor Code violations. However, the Court held that the UCL did not apply to alleged violations of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act occurring outside of California.

Court Takes the Legs Right Out from Underneath Plaintiff’s Seating Case

December 14, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: General (CA)

Littler

In the first significant ruling of its kind, the Los Angeles Superior Court in Bright v. 99¢ Only Stores granted the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiff’s representative Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) allegations. The plaintiff, Eugina Bright, filed a complaint against 99¢ Only Stores in June 2009 alleging that the store failed to provide her, and all other cashiers, with suitable seating.

California Appellate Court Rules that “All Relevant Evidence” Must Be Considered in Workplace Violence Proceedings, Including Otherwise Inadmissible Hearsay Evidence

December 12, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: Human Resources (CA)

Littler

In a ground-breaking decision that will make it easier for employers to obtain restraining orders to protect their employees from violence in the workplace, a California appellate court has ruled that “all relevant evidence” must be considered in such proceedings – even otherwise inadmissible hearsay. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Wilson, Nos. D058491 & D058492 (Fourth Dist., Div. One Dec. 5, 2011).

Minimum Salary Requirement Increases for California Computer Professional Exemption Announced

December 9, 2011 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Wage & Hour (CA)

Jackson Lewis

The required compensation levels for employees exempt from overtime under the California computer professional exemption will increase by 2.5 percent from the current levels beginning January 1, 2012, the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) has announced.

Employers Must Comply with Changes to San Francisco Health Care Mandate Beginning January 1, 2012

December 9, 2011 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Wage & Hour (CA)

Jackson Lewis

San Francisco’s Health Care Security Ordinance has been amended to require more of certain employers with workers in the City and County of San Francisco. The amendments will take effect January 1, 2012.

New California Employment Laws for 2012

December 9, 2011 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: General (CA)

Jackson Lewis

A number of new employment bills making significant changes in California employment law and requiring review of employer human resources policies and employee handbooks has been signed by California Governor Jerry Brown. The new laws are effective January 1, 2012, unless otherwise indicated. We highlight what we believe to be the most significant below.

California Supply Chain Law Affects Large Retailers and Manufacturers Doing Business in California

December 5, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: General (CA)

Littler

Responding to a stated concern over human trafficking and goods that are produced by forced or child labor, the California Legislature passed the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 with the goal of “ensur[ing] large retailers and manufacturers provide consumers with information regarding their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their supply chains.”1 This is the first state or federal law of its kind. Beginning January 1, 2012, every retailer and manufacturer doing business in California with annual worldwide gross receipts exceeding $100 million must conspicuously disclose on its website the extent to which it does the following:

Verdict for Employee in California Sexual Harassment Case Affirmed Despite Inconsistent Testimony

November 30, 2011 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Sexual Harassment (CA)

Jackson Lewis

Minor inconsistencies in witness testimony need not render a plaintiff-employee’s account of sexual harassment so “inherently improbable” as to require reversal of the jury’s verdict, the California Court of Appeal has held. The Court thus affirmed judgment in favor of the employee in a sexual harassment case.

California Court of Appeal Declines to Hold Individual Supervisors Liable for Discrimination or Retaliation Under California Military and Veterans Code

November 18, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: Human Resources (CA)

Littler

In a case of first impression, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District ruled that there is no individual liability for discrimination or retaliation under California Military and Veterans Code section 394, which protects from discrimination employees who are called to active duty. Haligowski v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. B231310 (Nov. 11, 2011).

A California Federal Court Reinvigorates the Growing Tension over the Preemptive Scope of California’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act

November 17, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: Trade Secrets (CA)

Littler

In the latest twist in the developing law regarding the preemptive scope of California’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA)1 a California federal court in Amron International Diving Supply, Inc. v. Hydrolinx Diving Communication, Inc.2 (“Amron”) recently issued a decision reinvigorating the growing tension between courts addressing the issue of UTSA preemption – a tension that, unfortunately, is likely to continue into the foreseeable future.

Federal District Court Holds Motor Carriers Are Not Subject to California’s Meal and Rest Break Laws

November 14, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: Wage & Hour (CA)

Littler

A federal district court in California recently issued a decision, in Dilts v. Penske Logistics, LLC, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122421 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011), holding that motor carriers that transport property are not subject to California’s meal and rest break laws because such laws are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAA Act).

What Is the Duty to “Provide” a Meal Period? Oral Argument Before the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court

November 10, 2011 | Littler Filed Under: Wage & Hour (CA)

Littler

The long awaited oral argument in the seminal meal and rest break decision involving Brinker Restaurant finally occurred today. Before a packed courtroom, lawyers for a hopeful class of waiters and waitresses and the representatives of California employers battled it out before the seven justices of the California Supreme Court.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 118
  • Go to page 119
  • Go to page 120
  • Go to page 121
  • Go to page 122
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

California Index

  • Age Discrimination (CA)
  • Class Actions (CA)
  • Disability Discrimination (CA)
  • Employee Benefits (CA)
  • Employment At-Will (CA)
  • Fair Employment And Housing Act (CA)
  • Family Leave (CA)
  • General (CA)
  • Health And Safety (CA)
  • Human Resources (CA)
  • Labor Law (CA)
  • Lawyering (CA)
  • Privacy Rights (CA)
  • Race Discrimination (CA)
  • Religious Discrimination (CA)
  • Restrictive Covenants (CA)
  • Sex Discrimination (CA)
  • Sexual Harassment (CA)
  • Trade Secrets (CA)
  • Wage & Hour (CA)
  • WARN Act (CA)
  • Whistleblowers (CA)
  • Workers' Compensation (CA)
C-Screen

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

August 2022
SMTWTFS
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
« Jul    

Trending Content

  • Introduction To Employee Handbook Policy
  • Employee Locker Policy
  • Employee Discipline Policy
  • Employment At-Will Policy
  • Employee Benefits Policy
  • Workplace Privacy and Confidentiality
  • Conditional Offer Letter
  • FMLA Policy
  • Attendance Policy
  • Confidential Information, Non-Disclosure Provision

Footer

Social Profiles

RSSTwitterFacebookLinkedin

Tags

ABC News (50) Axios (18) Benefits Pro (25) Bloomberg (308) CBS News (55) CNBC (124) CNN (80) EEOC (230) Entrepreneur (70) Evil HR Lady (431) Fast Company (101) Forbes (794) Fortune (31) GovExec (22) Harvard Business Review (574) Inc. (90) Jackson Lewis (29) Law.com (41) LinkedIn (26) Littler (43) MarketWatch (26) MSN (124) NBC (59) NBC News (28) Newsweek (22) New York City (43) New York Post (40) New York Times (737) NPR (116) Philadelphia (25) Politico (31) Reuters (112) Richmond Times Dispatch (23) San Francisco (19) Seattle Times (21) SHRM (58) The Atlantic (18) The Guardian (42) TIME (21) USA Today (68) US News (64) Wall Street Journal (314) Washington Post (147) Yahoo! News (68) Yahoo News (19)

Navigation

  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Log In

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC • P.O. Box 45, Chinchilla, PA 18410 • 570-301-6277 • info@elinfonet.com