• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Affiliate Login
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Lawyer Directory
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Our Feeds

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice
Daily Newsletter
Weekly Newsletter
California Newsletter
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Home > Federal Law Articles > Religious Discrimination > Reasonable Accommodation

Articles Discussing Reasonable Accommodations For Employees Based On Religious Beliefs.

Dear Littler: How Do We Handle Requests for Time Off for Religious Observance?

October 24, 2022 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

Littler

Dear Littler:  We are a retail store with locations across the country.  We are open seven days a week, and our sales staff have rotating shifts to provide coverage throughout the week.

Dear Littler: Must we accommodate an employee’s religious views in every instance?

August 31, 2022 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

Littler

I’m an HR representative at an advertising agency based in New York City. We have a question about a religiously vocal employee.

Religious Accommodations and Mandatory Vaccination

December 2, 2020 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

This HRW Client Alert provides a brief overview of employer obligations and options when faced
with a religious accommodation request. Employers are strongly encouraged to discuss
accommodation requests with counsel as the decision whether to grant such requests is fact
specific and may depend on the workplace, the employee’s position, the basis for the request, and
evolving science and public health concerns.

It’s the Most Wonderful Time of the Year to Contemplate Religious Accommodations under Title VII

November 18, 2020 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

With the holidays fast approaching, many employers are due for a refresh on how and when to provide religious accommodations to their employees. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion.

Religious Accommodations: When Biometric Scanners and the Mark of the Beast Collide

August 2, 2017 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

Increasingly, employers are turning to biometric scanners – usually a fingerprint or hand scanner – to track employees’ working time. This method for clocking in and out is generally more efficient and accurate than traditional methods, such as using a punch clock.

Hospital May Fire Employee Who Refused Influenza Vaccination, Federal Court Finds

May 10, 2016 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

Jackson Lewis

A Boston hospital reasonably accommodated an employee’s religious objections to its influenza vaccination program by offering alternatives, but exempting the employee from the vaccination requirement would impose an undue hardship on the hospital because of the risk of infection to patients, a federal court in Massachusetts has concluded, granting the hospital’s motion for summary judgment in an employee’s religious discrimination suit. Leontine K. Robinson v. Children’s Hospital Boston, C.A. No. 14-10263-DJC (D. Mass. Apr. 5, 2016).

Religious Objectors: Employer’s Duty to Make Religious Accommodations

September 21, 2015 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

Kentucky County Clerk Kim Davis was recently jailed due to her refusal to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples. In other news, a flight attendant refused to serve alcohol due to her religious beliefs. The public reaction to both situations was intense and the debate well-publicized. These events also highlight a new wave of confusion regarding the requirements facing employers with respect to religious accommodations. The answer for employers can differ widely depending upon the industry, jurisdiction, legislation and the specific interpretation of the laws at issue. Some states have enacted so-called religious freedom statutes and thus religious objectors have significant protections. Read on for tips to employers.

Supreme Court to Decide Religious Accommodation Case

October 3, 2014 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

Littler

The U.S. Supreme Court announced today that it will consider whether an employer can be liable under Title VII for refusing to hire an applicant or discharging an employee based on a “religious observance and practice” if the individual did not directly and explicitly request an accommodation and the employer did not actually know the individual needed an accommodation. In the case now before the Supreme Court, EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that an employer will not be liable for failing to accommodate an applicant’s religious garb/grooming practice unless the applicant personally and explicitly tells the employer the practice is religious and seeks an accommodation.

Seventh Circuit Emphasizes Importance of Employers Grasping Religious Nature of Time-Off Requests and Properly Communicating With Employees in Order to Accommodate Appropriately

August 8, 2013 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

Littler

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision in Adeyeye v. Heartland Sweeteners, Inc.,1 reminds employers that a very broad definition of “religion” applies in Title VII religious discrimination cases. Given this broad definition, employers must be sufficiently alert to perceive, or at least to inquire about, the possible religious nature of employees’ accommodation requests – even when those requests do not contain the word religion. The Adeyeye decision also cautions employers to make careful, case-by-case determinations as to whether granting a religious accommodation would impose an undue hardship. The decision also makes it clear that an employer will not be reasonably accommodating an employee if all the employer offers is the opportunity to resign, fulfill a religious obligation, and then reapply if there happens to be an open position available.

Hospital’s Motion to Dismiss Religious Discrimination Claim Denied When Vegan Employee Refuses Mandatory Flu Shot

January 31, 2013 Filed Under: Reasonable Accommodation

Many health care providers mandate certain types of shots or inoculations for their employees to reduce the risk of the spread of serious illnesses such as the flu. Hospitals and long-term care providers have increasingly taken a hard line when employees have refused to get vaccinated because some of their licensing standards require certain vaccinations. For other health care providers, it is viewed as a best practice to reduce the spread of illness and disease among the infirm and elderly. However, as some recent cases illustrate, employers need to exercise caution in taking an adverse employment action when an employee refuses to get vaccinated. For example, if an employee cannot have a flu shot or other inoculation due to a disability, this will likely preclude an employer from taking an adverse employment action against the employee.

Primary Sidebar

Religious Discrimination Index

  • Dress Code And Grooming (5)
  • General (Religious Discrimination) (59)
  • Reasonable Accommodation (10)

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

October 2023
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 
« Sep    

Trending Content

  • Reminder: October 1 New Requirements For Considering Criminal History in Employment
  • Andrew Maunz Discusses Potential Impact of Federal Government Shutdown on EEOC Charges
  • Dismantling Gender Walls in the Construction Industry
  • Federal Court Upholds DOL’s Authority to Set Minimum-Salary Test for White-Collar Exemption
  • Nathan J. Milner Tackles Fraudulent New York Workers’ Comp Claims in CLM Magazine
  • Employers Beware – Deadline for Payment of Arbitration Fees Strictly Construed
  • Work Advice: Reentering a profession after years in a low-stress job
  • Drivers and Dealers Could Soon Feel Impact of U.A.W. Strikes
  • 3 Ways to Prepare for the Future of Work
  • Pregnant Workers Fairness Act will actually hurt women in the workplace

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Footer

Tags

ABC News (64) Axios (44) BBC (51) Benefits Pro (34) Bloomberg (418) Business Insider (96) CBS News (87) CNBC (240) CNN (137) EEOC (404) Entrepreneur (86) Evil HR Lady (633) Fast Company (161) Forbes (1114) Fortune (127) Fox News (36) Harvard Business Review (885) HR Dive (40) Inc. (120) Law.com (41) Littler (43) MarketWatch (33) MSN (141) NBC (62) NBC News (43) Newsweek (31) New York City (71) New York Post (68) New York Times (1101) NPR (167) Politico (53) Power At Work (66) Psychology Today (34) Reuters (170) Richmond Times Dispatch (32) Seattle Times (33) SHRM (289) The Guardian (81) TIME (38) USA Today (102) US News (81) Wall Street Journal (441) Washington Post (268) Yahoo! Finance (30) Yahoo! News (122)

Navigation

  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Log In

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC • P.O. Box 45, Chinchilla, PA 18410 • 570-301-6277 • info@elinfonet.com