On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in which it held that Title VII does not impose a heightened or different burden of proof for majority-group plaintiffs. Simply put, “reverse discrimination” Title VII claims should be interpreted using the same framework as any other Title VII claim.
Articles Discussing Race Discrimination Under Title VII Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964.
Employee Replaced by White Male Coupled With Employer’s Poor Investigation Fuels Disparate Treatment Claim
In Lui v. DeJoy, the Ninth Circuit held that a woman of Chinese ethnicity’s demotion, when coupled with a white male replacing her position, gave rise to an inference of discrimination. The employer’s investigation into the demotion and the employee’s related complaints lacked depth and independence and therefore was insufficient to show a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the demotion.
Factual Background
Dawn Lui, a woman of Chinese ethnicity, worked for the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) since 1992 and was promoted to Postmaster of the Shelton, Washington Post Office in 2014. After her promotion, Lui alleged that she was targeted with false complaints related to her sex, race, and national origin. Lui’s supervisor reported his concerns about Lui’s treatment to Human Resources and alleged that the HR Manager worked closely with one of Lui’s alleged perpetrators to pursue discipline against Lui. USPS asked Lui’s supervisor to demote Lui based on “Unacceptable Conduct[.]”He refused because he believed the allegations were false. USPS replaced Lui’s supervisor with a manager who approved Lui’s demotion. USPS then replaced Lui with a white man.
Lui internally appealed her demotion to Karen Bacon, the Tacoma Postmaster. Bacon’s investigation consisted of a documentary review of HR’s demotion decision and written complaints by other employees about Lui. Bacon affirmed the demotion. Lui filed suit against USPS alleging a hostile work environment; discrimination based on race, color, sex, national origin, and age; and retaliation. The district court granted summary judgment against Lui on all of her claims.
The Ninth Circuit’s Ruling
The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Lui’s disparate treatment claim.
Demotion Coupled with White Male Replacement Shows Inference of Discrimination
The Ninth Circuit held that Lui’s showing that she was: (1) demoted from her position at a lower salary and (2) replaced by a white man gave “rise to an inference of discrimination, and that is all she needs to show to satisfy the fourth element” of her prima facie discrimination claim.
To establish a prima facie case of discrimination the plaintiff must show that: (1) she belongs to a protected class; (2) she was qualified for the position; (3) she was subjected to an adverse employment action; and (4) that the position remained open and was ultimately filled by a person outside her protected class. The parties disputed only the fourth element. The Ninth Circuit explained that Lui properly satisfied the fourth element “merely by showing that she was replaced by someone outside her protected class.”
Bacon’s Investigation Did Not Establish Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Reason for the Demotion
The Ninth Circuit also held that USPS’s investigation into Lui’s demotion did not satisfy USPS’s burden to show a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action. The court pointed out that USPS (1) heard no live testimony; (2) never met any of the employees who submitted complaints about Lui; and (3) credited their written complaints even after Lui’s supervisor raised concerns that their complaints were motivated by racial animus. Under those circumstances, the court held that USPS’s investigation failed to establish that the demotion was an independent decision or the result of bias.
Takeaways for Employers
The court’s ruling emphasizes two critical elements of employment decision-making. First, recognizing the importance of employment decisions that raise an inference of discrimination, and having independent evidentiary support for the decision. Second, ensuring that there are strong, in-depth, independent investigations of employee discrimination complaints. When both of these issues arise, companies should proceed carefully and make sure their decisions are supported at each step.
If you have questions about your organization’s employee investigations or need assistance reviewing your policies, please contact one of our experienced labor and employment CDF attorneys.
DEI Under Scrutiny, Part XII: Scope of Pending Legal Challenge to Nasdaq’s Diversity Rule Narrows
On July 25, 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) notified the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that at least part of the basis for the currently pending legal attack on the Nasdaq’s proposed diversity rule is now moot, thus narrowing the scope of the court’s
U.S. Census Bureau Seeks Feedback on Implementing New Federal Race and Ethnicity Categories in 2027
The U.S. Census Bureau is seeking feedback on its plan to implement the White House’s newly adopted statistical standards for race and ethnicity data collection for federal agencies in 2027. Federal agencies must implement the new categories as soon as possible, but no later than March 28, 2029.
On the Horizon: New Standards for Collecting and Presenting Race and Ethnicity Data
As organizations are preparing and filing the 2023 EEO-1 Data Collection reports, (deadline is June 4th) there’s a change on the horizon for future reporting.
For the first time in over twenty-five years, in March, 2024 the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published a set of proposed revisions to
Celebrating AANHPI Heritage Month: Innovation Leads to Growth
In honor of this year’s Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month theme “Advancing Leaders Through Innovation,” Littler associate Ed Tsui spoke with Littler shareholder, Lavanga Wijekoon, who shared how he has been able to advance his practice at the firm through innovation.
OMB Announces New Agency Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity
On March 29, 2024, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) published revisions to Statistical Policy Directive No. 15: Standards for Maintaining, Collecting, and Presenting Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity (SPD 15). These changes will impact how companies collect the race and ethnicity data for their federal reporting.
White House Publishes Revisions to Federal Agency Race and Ethnicity Reporting Categories
On March 28, 2024, the White House unveiled revisions to the federal statistical standards for race and ethnicity data collection for federal agencies, adding a new category and requiring a combined race and ethnicity question that allows respondents to select multiple categories with which they identify.
Celebrating Black History Month: From Litigation to Literature
As February comes to a close, we end our celebration of Black History Month with a podcast featuring Littler attorneys and authors in honor of this year’s theme “African Americans and the Arts.” Littler attorney Karimah Lamar, has a thought-provoking conversation with fellow Littler attorneys Michael Wilder and Tiffany Obeng, who
What is “Fairness”?
In this episode, Jen explains the difference between “fairness” and “equality,” and why it matters.
U.S. Department of Education Office Publishes Guidance on Race in Admissions, School Programming
The U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division have published a joint Dear Colleague Letter (Joint OCR and DOJ DCL) that, together with a Q&A, provides information to assist colleges and universities in understanding the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. decisions.
ESG: Human Rights and Modern Slavery
In the face of evolving challenges in labor and employment law, Jackson Lewis attorneys identify issues dominating the modern workplace and answer the question on every employer’s mind – how will my business be impacted? Stream episodes of our podcast program on the platform of your choosing.
Celebrating AAPI Heritage Month: Bringing About Change Through Servant Leadership
As May comes to a close, we end our celebration of Asian American Pacific Islander Heritage Month with the second of two podcasts that feature the personal stories of some of our ‘Ohana group attorneys. Littler attorney Brandon Mita has an inspiring conversation with fellow Littler attorneys Nicole LeFave
A Conversation on Black Resistance, Resilience and Being Real
As February comes to a close, Littler is capping off our celebration of Black History Month with a special podcast highlighting the voices of some of our Black attorneys. Kimberly Dobson (Long Island, NY) talks with fellow Littler attorneys, Kim Carter (San Diego, CA), Jason Byrd (New York City,
Collecting Data on Race and Ethnicity: White House Launches New Plan
The White House recently launched an effort to revise and update the statistical standards for race and ethnicity data collection across federal agencies with a stated goal of better reflecting the growing diversity of people in the United States. On January 26, 2023, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)