• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Affiliate Login
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Lawyer Directory
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Our Feeds

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice
Daily Newsletter
Weekly Newsletter
California Newsletter
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Home > Federal Law Articles > Labor Law > Protected Concerted Activity

Articles Discussing Protected Concerted Activity Under The NLRA.

NLRB General Counsel Issues Handbook Guidance

June 12, 2018 | Ford Harrison Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Executive Summary: In a 20-page memorandum dated June 6, 2018, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Peter Robb issued guidance to the Regions on handbook rules in light of the Board’s decision in The Boeing Company, 365 NLRB No. 154 (Dec. 14, 2017).

NLRB General Counsel Issues Guidance Regarding Handbook Rules

June 11, 2018 | Littler Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Littler

On June 6, 2018, NLRB General Counsel Peter Robb issued a lengthy 20-page Memorandum (GC 18-04) providing detailed guidance regarding enforcement of “Handbook Rules Post-Boeing.”

NLRB Holds that Hospital’s Dress Code Policies Violate the NLRA

May 1, 2018 | Ford Harrison Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Executive Summary: In a 2-1 decision, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) held that a hospital’s policy that required direct patient care providers to wear hospital branded badge reels violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or the Act) because that policy was not specifically limited to immediate patient care areas. See Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Inc. and California Nurses Association/National Nurses Association (CAN/NNU), Case 21-CA-157007 (April 20, 2018).

NLRB Failed to Support Conclusion that Employee’s Disparaging Comments Were Protected, Not Disloyal

May 1, 2018 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Jackson Lewis

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has refused to enforce the NLRB’s order finding that an employee’s discharge violated the National Labor Relations Act because the Board did not satisfy the Supreme Court’s two-prong Jefferson Standard test for determining whether an employee’s disparaging statements to third parties about his employer are protected.

NLRB GC: Participating in Nationwide ‘Day Without Immigrants’ Is Protected Concerted Activity

April 11, 2018 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Jackson Lewis

Participating in the February 2017 “Day Without Immigrants” demonstration was protected concerted activity, according to an August 30, 2017, advice memorandum released on March 13, 2018, by the National Labor Relations Board General Counsel’s Division of Advice.

Employee’s Improper Access to Secured Area Outweighs Right to Engage in Concerted Activity, NLRB Finds

March 14, 2018 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Jackson Lewis

The National Labor Relations Board has held that an employee lost the protection of the National Labor Relations Act when he improperly accessed a secure area of the employer’s hotel, even though he did so in order to engage in otherwise protected concerted activity. KHRG Employer, LLC, 366 NLRB No. 22 (Feb. 28, 2018).

Off-Duty Employees Had Right to “Hang Out” on Employer’s Property to Publicize Dispute

May 30, 2017 | Ford Harrison Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

xecutive Summary: An administrative law judge recently ruled that a Pacific Northwest fast food chain violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by maintaining a policy that prohibited off-duty employees from loitering or “hanging out” on store property, even though no employee was actually disciplined for violating the policy.

Labor Board Allows Evidence to Explain Employee Handbook Ban on Video Recording

May 16, 2017 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Jackson Lewis

The National Labor Relations Board has denied a motion for summary judgment by the NLRB’s General Counsel in a case involving Mercedes-Benz U.S. International Inc.’s maintenance of an employee handbook rule prohibiting the use of cameras and video recording devices without prior approval.

Second Circuit Upholds NLRB Order Finding Derogatory Facebook Post Protected Under the National Labor Relations Act

April 27, 2017 | Ford Harrison Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

xecutive Summary: On April 21, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in National Labor Relations Board v. Pier Sixty, LLC, enforced an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) finding that an employee did not lose the protections of the National Labor Relations Act (Act) by posting a derogatory comment about his supervisor on Facebook while encouraging his co-workers to vote for the union in an upcoming election and in concluding that the employer violated the Act by discharging the employee. The Court of Appeals stated that the employer “failed to meet its burden of showing that Perez’s [the employee’s] behavior was so egregious as to lose the protection of the NLRA under the Board’s ‘totality-of-the-circumstances’ test.”

What Can You Say? D.C. Circuit Speaks on Employee Confidentiality

April 4, 2017 | Littler Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Littler

In a ruling that affects both union and non-union employers, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently held in Banner Health System v. NLRB that employers may not prohibit employees from discussing information related to employees’ salaries and discipline. While this decision does not break new ground, it does provide employers with some guidance on how the D.C. Circuit will scrutinize efforts to maintain confidentiality surrounding HR investigations.

Employees, Political Advocacy and the NLRB – What Can an Employer Do?

February 14, 2017 | Littler Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Littler

In the first few weeks of the Trump Presidency, there have been numerous marches, protests and other forms of political advocacy expressing views both in support of and in opposition to the President’s various appointments, executive orders and other actions. Employers concerned about protests potentially planned for the next few months and political advocacy in general understandably have questions surrounding how political demonstrations may affect their workplaces.

Workplace Dress Codes – Auto Dealer Can’t Bar Workers from Wearing Message Pins, Court Affirms NLRB

July 7, 2016 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Jackson Lewis

A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has upheld a National Labor Relations Board decision that a Massachusetts automobile dealer’s policy banning the wearing of “message pins” violated union insignia protections under the National Labor Relations Act. Boch Imports, Inc., d/b/a Boch Honda v. NLRB, Nos. 15-1653, 15-1721 (1st Cir. June 17, 2016).

NLRB Member Criticizes Board’s Handbook Rule Review Standard

May 10, 2016 | Jackson Lewis Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Jackson Lewis

The legality of employer work rules continues to draw National Labor Relations Board scrutiny on a regular basis.

NLRA Protections for Derogatory Statements and Four-Letter Words Attacking a Company and its Managers

April 12, 2016 | Littler Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Littler

More and more employers, union and non-union alike, are getting ensnared in efforts by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or “Board”) to aggressively expand employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”), to the detriment of employers. While employees have the express right under Section 7 of the Act “to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection,” such as discussing their terms and conditions of employment or lodging complaints about the workplace, the NLRB continues to condone bad behavior as “protected behavior” so long as it is tangentially related to concerted activity under the Act.

Workplace Recording Bans and the NLRA: Are “No-Recording” Policies Still Allowed?

February 18, 2016 | Littler Filed Under: Protected Concerted Activity

Littler

The ubiquity of smartphone applications (“apps”) that record audio and/or video – coupled with the risk of workplace discussions being uploaded to social media for all to hear – has led many employers to implement “no-recording” policies that prohibit employees from recording workplace interactions. It may come as a surprise to many employers, especially non-union employers, that a law from the 1930s, the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or the “Act”) has recently been construed to generally prohibit broad bans on workplace recordings. In a recent decision addressing a company’s no-recording policy, the National Labor Relations Board’ (“NLRB” or “the Board”) held that such bans unlawfully interfere with the rights of employees — unionized or not — to engage in concerted activity regarding their terms and conditions of employment.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Labor Law Article Index

  • Bargaining Units (16)
  • Collective Bargaining (19)
  • Coverage (NLRB) (38)
  • Decertification (1)
  • General (Labor Law) (340)
  • Labor Arbitration (3)
  • LMRDA (1)
  • NLRB (128)
  • Picketing (10)
  • Protected Concerted Activity (58)
  • Strikes (3)
  • Successorship (6)
  • Unfair Labor Practices (12)
  • Union Organizing (145)
  • Unions (20)
  • Weingarten Rights (11)
C-Screen

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

May 2022
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 
« Apr    

Trending Content

  • Introduction To Employee Handbook Policy
  • Confidential Information, Non-Disclosure Provision
  • Employee Discipline Policy
  • Employment At-Will Policy
  • Conditional Offer Letter
  • Employee Benefits Policy
  • Workplace Privacy and Confidentiality
  • Sample Employee Handbook Disclaimer
  • Employee Locker Policy
  • Government Mandated Benefits

Footer

Social Profiles

RSSTwitterFacebookLinkedin

Tags

ABC News (46) Benefits Pro (23) Bloomberg (274) CBS (15) CBS News (48) CNBC (99) CNN (66) EEOC (209) Entrepreneur (59) Evil HR Lady (395) Fast Company (88) Forbes (720) Fortune (25) GovExec (21) Harvard Business Review (506) Inc. (75) Jackson Lewis (29) Law.com (41) LinkedIn (26) Littler (43) MarketWatch (25) MSN (98) NBC (57) NBC News (27) Newsweek (14) New York City (43) New York Post (37) New York Times (673) NPR (104) Philadelphia (25) Politico (29) Reuters (93) Richmond Times Dispatch (18) Seattle Times (20) SHRM (46) The Atlantic (17) The Guardian (33) The Motley Fool (14) TIME (17) USA Today (65) US News (59) Wall Street Journal (286) Washington Post (127) Yahoo! News (53) Yahoo News (19)

Navigation

  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Log In

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC • P.O. Box 45, Chinchilla, PA 18410 • 570-301-6277 • info@elinfonet.com