• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Affiliate Login
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Lawyer Directory
  • Newsletters
  • Contact Us
  • Our Feeds

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice
Daily Newsletter
Weekly Newsletter
California Newsletter
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Home > Federal Law Articles > Labor Law > Collective Bargaining

Articles Discussing Collective Bargaining.

Past Practice in the Past? NLRB Narrows Past Practice Defense for Employer Unilateral Action During Bargaining

September 7, 2023 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

On August 30, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released two decisions that will make it more difficult for employers to implement past practices during a break in bargaining or at an impasse, opening the door for unions to hold employers hostage by dragging out collective bargaining.

NLRB follows the General Counsel’s Lead: Enhanced Remedies May Now Apply to Bad-Faith Bargaining

April 26, 2023 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Littler

In Noah’s Ark, the Board combined remedies it can impose on an employer that engaged in repeated unfair labor practices. The decision may predict the expansion of remedies for bad-faith bargaining. The decision follows the trend of increasingly punitive and extraordinary remedies being implemented by the Board.

What Labor Board’s Return to Allowing Micro-Units for Bargaining Means for Construction Employers

December 30, 2022 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Jackson Lewis

The National Labor Relations Board has issued a decision that could be of significant aid to organized labor in reorganizing the construction industry. American Steel Construction Inc. and Iron Workers Local 25, 372 NLRB 23 (2022).

Labor Updates: Recent NLRB Rulings on Scope of Union Bargaining Units, NCAA Athletes

December 30, 2022 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

As we’ve previously reported, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB, or the Board) under the Biden administration has been issuing decisions that are more union-friendly and less favorable to employers. Earlier this month, the Board reversed a Trump-era decision that […]

The post Labor Updates: Recent NLRB Rulings on Scope


NLRB Says Dues Must Be Collected Post CBA, Reverses Course Once Again

October 12, 2022 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

In a decision dated September 30, 2022, the National Labor Relations Board ruled that employers must continue to collect voluntarily authorized union dues from the paychecks of employees after the expiration of the agreement.

NLRB Rules Employers Cannot Unilaterally Cease Dues Checkoff After CBA Expiration

October 6, 2022 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Executive Summary: On October 3, 2022, in a 3-2 decision, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) reversed its previous ruling from 2019 and held that a union dues checkoff provision should be treated as part of the status quo that the employer cannot unilaterally change following contract expiration. See 28-CA-213783, 371 NLRB No. 160 (2022).

Aggressive vs. Bad Faith Bargaining: Where is the Line?

June 1, 2021 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Littler

The National Labor Relations Board, by a vote of 2-1, recently reversed an administrative law judge (ALJ) in finding that a hospital did not violate the National Labor Relations Act (the Act) by failing and refusing to bargain in good faith with the union.  District Hospital Partners, L.P., 370

Labor Board: Successor Required to Bargain With Union Over Unilateral Layoffs

September 16, 2020 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Jackson Lewis

More than five years and a pandemic later, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has clarified a successor employer’s union bargaining obligations regarding layoffs under the National Labor Relations Act. Tramont Manufacturing, LLC, 369 NLRB No. 136 (July 27, 2020).

NLRB Rules Notice and Opportunity to Bargain Over Discipline No Longer Required in New Bargaining Relationships

July 1, 2020 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently overturned a 2016 decision holding that an employer violates Sections 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by failing to provide notice and an opportunity to bargain to a newly elected union prior to disciplining unit members.

NLRB Finds Employers Do Not Have Bargain Discipline with a Newly Certified Union Prior to the Signing of an Initial Contract

June 29, 2020 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

On Tuesday, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) in 800 River Road Operating Company, LLC d/b/a Care One at New Milford,  (Care One) issued a decision overturning the controversial Total Security Management decision. In Care One, the NLRB held that […]

The post NLRB Finds Employers Do Not Have Bargain


Reversing Course, NLRB Holds Employers Have No Pre-disciplinary Bargaining Obligation

June 29, 2020 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Littler

On June 23, 2020, the National Labor Relations Board issued its decision in 800 River Road Operating Company, LLC d/b/a Care One at New Milford, 369 NLRB No. 109 (2020), holding that employers have no duty to bargain over serious employee discipline imposed before the negotiation of a collective

NLRB: Union Had Responsibility to Bargain About Employer Information Confidentiality Claim

April 22, 2020 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Jackson Lewis

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has ruled an employer does not have a duty to provide a union with relevant information that contains confidential material if the union has refused the employer’s offer to bargain over ways to protect its legitimate confidentiality interests. Oncor Electric Delivery, LLC, 369 NLRB

Labor Board: Unions Waived Right to Bargain Over Changes to Retiree Medical Benefits

October 15, 2019 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Jackson Lewis

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held that an employer did not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it unilaterally changed retirees’ medical benefits without first negotiating with the unions that represented its employees. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co., 368 NLRB No. 48 (Sept. 4, 2019).

E-Verify Subject to Collective Bargaining

September 16, 2018 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Jackson Lewis

While I-9 compliance is important, companies cannot forget about other labor and employment laws. In May 2018, a meatpacking company in Illinois was caught between ICE and the National Labor Relations Board.

NLRB GC: Employer Can Unilaterally Implement Decisions Made Before Union Election Victory

July 9, 2018 Filed Under: Collective Bargaining

Jackson Lewis

An employer lawfully unilaterally implemented a stricter tardiness and absentee policy even though a union had recently won an election to represent its workers, according to a memorandum released by the National Labor Relations Board General Counsel’s Division of Advice. Cott Beverages, Inc., No. 16-CA-206068 (Div. of Advice, Apr. 26, 2018, released May 15, 2018).

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Labor Law Article Index

  • Bargaining Units (16)
  • Collective Bargaining (25)
  • Coverage (NLRB) (38)
  • Decertification (1)
  • General (Labor Law) (416)
  • Labor Arbitration (3)
  • LMRDA (1)
  • NLRB (146)
  • Picketing (10)
  • Protected Concerted Activity (82)
  • Strikes (10)
  • Successorship (6)
  • Unfair Labor Practices (15)
  • Union Organizing (159)
  • Unions (22)
  • Weingarten Rights (12)

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

October 2023
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 
« Sep    

Trending Content

  • Reminder: October 1 New Requirements For Considering Criminal History in Employment
  • Andrew Maunz Discusses Potential Impact of Federal Government Shutdown on EEOC Charges
  • Dismantling Gender Walls in the Construction Industry
  • Federal Court Upholds DOL’s Authority to Set Minimum-Salary Test for White-Collar Exemption
  • Nathan J. Milner Tackles Fraudulent New York Workers’ Comp Claims in CLM Magazine
  • Employers Beware – Deadline for Payment of Arbitration Fees Strictly Construed
  • Work Advice: Reentering a profession after years in a low-stress job
  • Drivers and Dealers Could Soon Feel Impact of U.A.W. Strikes
  • 3 Ways to Prepare for the Future of Work
  • Pregnant Workers Fairness Act will actually hurt women in the workplace

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Footer

Tags

ABC News (64) Axios (44) BBC (51) Benefits Pro (34) Bloomberg (418) Business Insider (96) CBS News (87) CNBC (240) CNN (137) EEOC (404) Entrepreneur (86) Evil HR Lady (633) Fast Company (161) Forbes (1114) Fortune (127) Fox News (36) Harvard Business Review (885) HR Dive (40) Inc. (120) Law.com (41) Littler (43) MarketWatch (33) MSN (141) NBC (62) NBC News (43) Newsweek (31) New York City (71) New York Post (68) New York Times (1101) NPR (167) Politico (53) Power At Work (66) Psychology Today (34) Reuters (170) Richmond Times Dispatch (32) Seattle Times (33) SHRM (289) The Guardian (81) TIME (38) USA Today (102) US News (81) Wall Street Journal (441) Washington Post (268) Yahoo! Finance (30) Yahoo! News (122)

Navigation

  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • Trending
  • Human Resources
    • HR Guidebook
    • HR Policy Samples
    • Employment Contracts
  • Discussion Forums
  • About Us
Log In

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC • P.O. Box 45, Chinchilla, PA 18410 • 570-301-6277 • info@elinfonet.com