• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Newsletters
  • Labor & Employment Law Events
  • Our Feeds
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice
Daily Newsletter
Weekly Newsletter
California Newsletter
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • HR Policy Samples
  • HR Guidebook
  • Employment Contracts
Home > Federal Law Articles > Labor Law > Labor Law - Bargaining Units

Articles Discussing Collective Bargaining Units.

Labor Board to Revisit Standard for Determining Appropriate Unit for Bargaining

Posted: December 30, 2021 | Jackson Lewis Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has announced that it is considering adopting a more union-friendly approach in determining the appropriate voting unit when a union petitions for an election. American Steel Construction Inc. and Iron Workers Local 25, 370 NLRB No. 41 (Dec. 7, 2021).

NLRB Creates New 3-Step Analysis for Unit Determinations

Posted: September 15, 2019 | Littler Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

On September 9, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its decision in The Boeing Company, 368 NLRB No. 67 (2019), clarifying an earlier ruling and reinstating the traditional community of interest standard for bargaining unit determinations.

Bargaining Unit Can Still Be ‘Micro’ under ‘Community of Interest’ Standard

Posted: January 14, 2019 | Jackson Lewis Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

After the NLRB adopted a new standard for determining bargaining-unit composition, many expected fewer micro-units would result. PCC Structurals, 365 NLRB No. 160 (2017) (PCC I). However, when the employer filed a request for review (appeal) of the Regional Director’s decision allowing, on remand, a “micro-unit” of its employees to vote on union representation under the new standard, the NLRB denied it. PCC Structurals, Inc., No. 19-RC-202188 (Nov. 28, 2018) (PCC II).

Is That Robot in the Bargaining Unit?

Posted: December 28, 2018 | Jackson Lewis Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

Drones fly over the jobsite, snapping photos of progress and scanning the area for possible safety concerns. A 3D-printer churns out customized parts and scaled models. A remote-controlled robot lays bricks meticulously, with near-perfect precision and five times faster than a human.

NLRB Tosses “Overwhelming Community of Interest” Standard and Returns to the “Traditional Community of Interest” Standard in Determining Appropriate Bargaining Units

Posted: January 9, 2018 | Ford Harrison Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

Executive Summary: On December 15, 2017, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board) overruled Specialty Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center of Mobile, 357 NLRB 934 (2011), which required an “overwhelming community of interest” when determining the appropriateness of a bargaining unit, and returned to the “traditional community of interest” standard that the Board has applied throughout most of history. See PCC Structurals, Inc. and International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, District Lodge W24, Case 19-RC-202188.

New NLRB GC Opens Door to Possible Widespread Bargaining Unit Changes

Posted: December 26, 2017 | Jackson Lewis Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

The National Labor Relations Board General Counsel’s Division of Operations Management has issued a sweeping Memorandum to Regional Offices setting forth a variety of circumstances under which those offices should process “currently active [representation] cases” applying the NLRB’s recent decision (PCC Structurals, Inc.) that overruled Specialty Healthcare.

Fifth Circuit Upholds Micro-Bargaining Unit at Retailer, But Dissent Finds Labor Board’s Legal Standard Wanting

Posted: December 13, 2016 | Jackson Lewis Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has denied, 9-6, a retailer’s request for a rehearing of the decision of a three-judge panel of the Court upholding the National Labor Relations Board’s decision that the retailer must bargain with a unit limited to employees in its cosmetic and fragrance department. Macy’s, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 15-60022 (Nov. 18, 2016).

Overruling Precedent, NLRB Holds Bargaining Units of Jointly and Solely Employed Employees May Elect Union Representative Absent Consent of Their Employers

Posted: July 14, 2016 | Jackson Lewis Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

In a departure from more than a decade-long precedent, the National Labor Relations Board has held that Board-conducted representation elections in bargaining units combining employees who are (a) jointly employed by a user employer and supplier employer and (b) solely employed by the user employer do not require the consent of either employer. Miller & Anderson, Inc., 364 NLRB No. 39 (July 11, 2016).

NLRB Paves the Way for Bargaining Units Composed of Employees of Two Different Employers

Posted: July 13, 2016 | Littler Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

In a widely anticipated decision, the National Labor Relations Board has reversed its 2004 decision in Oakwood Care Center,1 and determined a union seeking to represent employees in a bargaining unit composed of employees solely employed by a “user employer” (a company that hires temporary workers) and those jointly employed by the user employer and temporary labor provider is not required to obtain the consent of both employers. In Miller & Anderson, Inc.,2 the Board held that in determining if a combined unit is appropriate, it will apply traditional “community of interest” factors.

NLRB Holds Employer Consent Not Required for a Union to Represent a Bargaining Unit Combining both Regular and Temporary Employees

Posted: July 12, 2016 | Ford Harrison Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

Executive Summary: In a July 11, 2016, decision that will make it easier for unions to organize temporary employees, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) overruled existing precedent and held a union may represent a bargaining unit consisting of both regular employees and temporary employees supplied by another employer even if the employers do not consent. See Miller & Anderson, Inc., 364 NLRB No. 39 (2016). Previously, the NLRB would not permit an election in a bargaining unit that combined employees from more than one employer unless all employers agreed. This decision increases the likelihood that employers who use temporary employees will become enmeshed in labor relations disputes involving those temporary employees.

NLRB Drops 30-Year Precedent on Employers’ Right to Unilaterally Oust Unions Representing ‘Mixed-Guard’ Units

Posted: June 24, 2016 | Jackson Lewis Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

A divided National Labor Relations Board has overturned its 30-year-old rule that an employer may withdraw recognition, even without a showing of a loss of majority status, from a voluntarily-recognized union that represents both guards and non-guards (“mixed-guard union”) with respect to a unit of guards.

Another Court of Appeals Upholds NLRB’s ‘Micro-Unit’ Policy for Union Elections

Posted: June 21, 2016 | Jackson Lewis Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in New Orleans, is the latest circuit court to uphold the National Labor Relations Board’s restrictive “micro-unit” approach to voting units in NLRB elections adopted in Specialty Healthcare, 357 NLRB No. 83 (2011). Macy’s Inc. v. NLRB, No. 15-60022 (5th Cir. June 2, 2016).

New Bills Address Micro Units, Whistleblowing, Comp Time

Posted: March 23, 2015 | Littler Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

Labor and employment-related bills are once again becoming popular at the federal level. With less than a month before the April 14 effective date of the National Labor Relations Board’s “ambush” election rule, and the same day the House approved a resolution to try to stop the rule’s implementation, lawmakers are attempting to shape labor-management relations through other means.

NLRB General Counsel Takes Aim at Franchises

Posted: July 30, 2014 | Littler Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

In a move that could have a dramatic impact on the franchise business model, National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Richard Griffin has announced that his office intends to name a parent franchisor as a respondent in cases involving alleged unfair labor practices committed by franchisees if the parties are unable to reach a settlement. According to the Board, the agency is currently investigating the various charges, and may name the franchisor company as a joint employer should a complaint be issued.

Labor Board Likely Emboldened Following Sixth Circuit Decision Paving the Way for Micro-Units

Posted: August 23, 2013 | Littler Category: Labor Law - Bargaining Units

On Thursday, August 15, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the National Labor Relations Board’s decision in Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Mobile,1 affirming that the Board has broad discretion to determine appropriate bargaining units for union representation elections, including narrow so-called “micro-units.”

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Labor Law Article Index

  • Labor Law – Arbitration (5)
  • Labor Law – Bargaining Units (16)
  • Labor Law – Collective Bargaining (26)
  • Labor Law – Coverage (35)
  • Labor Law – Decertification (1)
  • Labor Law – General (476)
  • Labor Law – NLRB (178)
  • Labor Law – Picketing (10)
  • Labor Law – Protected Concerted Activity (84)
  • Labor Law – Strikes (10)
  • Labor Law – Unfair Labor Practices (16)
  • Labor Law – Union Organizing (182)
  • Labor Law – Unions (22)
  • Labor Law – Weingarten Rights (12)

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

May 2025
SMTWTFS
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC • P.O. Box 45, Chinchilla, PA 18410 • 570-301-6277 • info@elinfonet.com