One the biggest FMLA headaches for employers is when an employee fails or refuses to provide information to cure insufficient or incomplete medical certification. When the employer does not have the information to determine whether an absence qualifies as FMLA leave, it is left with a true dilemma: Try and obtain permission to talk to the health care provider? Delay or deny the leave and face possible litigation? Or simply approve the leave and go on with your day (after all, it’s easier to avoid the confrontation, right)?
Articles discussing the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) an other topics related to workplace leave.
Employee’s FMLA Claim Dismissed After Taking a Trip to Cancun
Employees should think twice before setting off on a Cancun vacation while out on FMLA leave. In an FMLA decision that smacks of pure common sense, a federal court has upheld an employer’s reasonable work rules that restricted an employee’s travel outside the immediate vicinity while on FMLA leave.
Are Employees Eligible for FMLA Leave When A Natural Disaster Strikes?
Natural disasters like the kind we recently have witnessed in the flood-ravaged areas of the southern United States raise a host of issues for employers. Some wonder whether they are required to pay their employees during suspended operations; others are unsure whether and to what extent health benefits should be offered.
Webinar Covers Changes to ADAAA, Effect on FMLA
Last week, my colleagues, Bill Pokorny and Josh Meeuwse, and I conducted a complimentary Webinar for our clients and friends of the firm regarding the ADA Amendments Act and its final regulations, which take effect May 24, 2011.
Baseball’s First Player Takes Paternity Leave
Here’s a shout out to all the dads out there who have a leg up on major league baseball players in at least one area — paternity leave.
Cat’s Paw Already Impacting FMLA Claims
Last month, the Supreme Court ruled in Staub v. Proctor Hospital(pdf) that an employer in an employment discrimination case can be liable for the discriminatory animus of an employee who influences, but does not make, the ultimate employment decision at issue. Known as the “cat’s paw†theory, it already is having an impact on claims brought under the Family and Medical Leave Act.
FMLA FAQ – What if my employee’s doctor refuses to use our form?
We have requested a medical certification from an employee who is seeking FMLA leave. We have our own certification form, and gave the employee a copy. The employee came back with a form letter from the doctor’s office stating that they charge a fee for filling out FMLA certification forms, and a note from the doctor stating that the employee was injured and needed FMLA leave. Do we have to accept the note in lieu of our form?
FMLA FAQ – Does a phone call to the doctor count as “treatment”?
An employee recently missed five days of work due to the flu. She did not visit the doctor, but did call in to the doctor’s office while she was out. Based upon the call, the doctor wrote her a prescription for some medication. Does this count as FMLA leave?
Play Ball! An FMLA Lineup That Keeps You in the Pennant Race
In this opening weekend of major league baseball, hope springs eternal for every baseball fan. In honor of my beloved Chicago White Sox, I offer an FMLA lineup card below that from top to bottom will help employers stay atop the pennant race throughout the year.
Where FMLA Bonding Leave is at Issue, Unmarried Parents Have More Generous Leave Rights
The folks at the California Public Agency Labor and Employment blog yesterday raised an issue that has popped up from time to time with our own clients: When it comes to “baby bonding” leave, does the Family and Medical Leave Act provide more generous benefits for unmarried parents than it does for married parents? In short, the answer is Yes.
An Employer’s FMLA Nightmare? Hooters Offers Fake “Doctor’s Notes” to Skip Work During NCAA Tourney
Over the upcoming weeks, when Carl the Custodian is missing from your workplace, you may want to give your local Hooters Restaurant a call. He just might be there watching the NCAA tournament.
FMLA Insights: Recovering Premium Payments from Employees After They Fail to Return from FMLA Leave – Podcast No. 20
Under the Family and Medical Leave Act, employers have the right to recover their share of health insurance premiums from an employee if he or she fails to return to work upon expiration of FMLA leave. In this month’s FMLA Insights podcast, we walk employers through how they can go about collecting these premiums and under what circumstances they may do so.
Supreme Court Expands Cat’s Paw Liability
On March 1, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Staub v. Proctor Hospital (.pdf) that an employer can be held liable for employment discrimination claims based upon the bias of a supervisor who influenced, but did not make the final employment decision. The Court struck down a narrow version of this so-called “cat’s paw†argument, under which the employer could be held liable only if the biased supervisor exerted a “singular influence†over the ultimate employment decision. It is clear that this ruling will apply broadly to cases including claims of retaliation and interference under the FMLA. Unfortunately, the Court’s decision provides little guidance for employers as to what steps they can take to avoid liability for “cat’s paw†claims.
Employee’s Failure to Return Supervisor’s Phone Calls Dooms FMLA Claim
When an employee’s request for medical leave is vague or is unclear, the Family and Medical Leave Act regulations specifically allow (in fact, they require) the employer to question the employee further to determine whether the absence potentially qualifies under the FMLA. When the employee fails to respond to these reasonable inquiries, the employee may lose the right to FMLA protection.
Summary of 2010 FMLA Cases Provides Valuable Resource to Employers and Employment Attorneys
Every February, the American Bar Association’s Federal Labor Standards Legislation Committee publishes a comprehensive report of significant FMLA decisions handed down by the federal courts in the previous year.