• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Newsletters
  • Labor & Employment Law Events
  • Our Feeds
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice
Daily Newsletter
Weekly Newsletter
California Newsletter
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • HR Policy Samples
  • HR Guidebook
  • Employment Contracts
Home > Federal Law Articles > FLSA > FLSA - Employers Covered

Articles Discussing What Employers Are Covered By The FLSA.

Department of Labor Issues Final Rule on FLSA’s Joint Employer Standard

Posted: January 14, 2020 | Jackson Lewis Category: FLSA - Employers Covered

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has released its Final Rule updating regulations governing “joint employer” status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The regulations have not been updated in more than 60 years.

Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow: Seventh Circuit Rejects Claim That Cosmetology Trainees Were Employees

Posted: August 17, 2017 | Jackson Lewis Category: FLSA - Employers Covered

Former cosmetology students are not employees entitled to pay under the FLSA and various state laws, the Seventh Circuit holds, rejecting the Department of Labor’s six-factor test but declining to adopt any bright-line test. Hollins v. Regency Corporation, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 15076 (7th Cir. Aug. 14, 2017).

House Introduces Bipartisan Bill Designed to Ease Joint Employer Uncertainty

Posted: July 28, 2017 | Littler Category: FLSA - Employers Covered

On July 27, 2017, House Republicans unveiled a bill, entitled the Save Local Business Act, that would amend two labor and employment statutes to clarify when an entity can be deemed a “joint employer.” At a press conference debuting the legislation, several of its sponsors, along with supporters from the business community, spoke about the need for the legislation.

Fourth Circuit Decision Establishes New Six-Factor Test for Determining Joint Employment under the FLSA

Posted: February 21, 2017 | Jackson Lewis Category: FLSA - Employers Covered

On January 25, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit established a new six-factor test to determine whether two or more entities are joint employers for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Salinas v. Commercial Interiors Inc., No. 15-1915, ___ F.3d ___, 2017 WL 360542 (4th Cir. Jan. 25. 2017). The resulting standard is unique from other circuits and appears to expand joint employer liability under the FLSA.

Fourth Circuit Pronounces Joint Employer Test Under FLSA

Posted: February 1, 2017 | Maynard Nexsen PC Category: FLSA - Employers Covered

On Jan. 25, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over North and South Carolina, issued an opinion in a collective action wage and hour case setting forth a six-factor test for determining whether two persons or entities constitute joint employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Salinas v. Commercial Interiors Inc., Opinion No. 15-1915. On the same day, the court also issued another opinion in two consolidated wage and hour cases under the FLSA, applying the six-factor test and reversing the district court’s dismissal of the cases. Hall v. DirectTV, LLC, Opinion Nos. 15-1857 and 15-1858. These opinions resolve some uncertainty regarding joint employment determinations under the FLSA that had been created by the varying tests used by district courts within the Fourth Circuit and set forth a broader, more expansive approach to joint employment determinations under the FLSA than under Title VII. A discussion of the Fourth Circuit’s joint employment test under Title VII can be found here.

Legal Alert: Eleventh Circuit Finds DHL Express Not a Joint Employer under FLSA

Posted: July 18, 2012 | Ford Harrison Category: FLSA - Employers Covered

Executive Summary: On July 9, 2012, a federal appeals court in Georgia affirmed the dismissal of DHL Express, Inc., from a lawsuit brought by a class of current and former delivery drivers alleging overtime violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). According to the court, an assessment of the economic realities of the case did not reveal an employment relationship between DHL and the drivers.

Primary Sidebar

FLSA Article Index

  • FLSA – Breaks (8)
  • FLSA – Commissions (5)
  • FLSA – Employees Covered (49)
  • FLSA – Employers Covered (6)
  • FLSA – Federal Minimum Wage (108)
  • FLSA – General (215)
  • FLSA – Holiday Pay, Gifts, Bonuses (9)
  • FLSA – Hours Worked (53)
  • FLSA – Industries and Occupations (87)
  • FLSA – Minimum Wage, State Issues (23)
  • FLSA – Overtime Exemptions (197)
  • FLSA – Overtime, General (65)
  • FLSA – Record Keeping (3)
  • FLSA – Retaliation (4)
  • FLSA – Taxes (12)
  • FLSA – Waiver and Release (2)

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

December 2025
SMTWTFS
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
« Nov    
  • City of Chicago Requires Airport Service Providers to Enter into Labor Peace Agreements

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC • P.O. Box 45, Chinchilla, PA 18410 • 570-301-6277 • info@elinfonet.com