• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Newsletters
  • Labor & Employment Law Events
  • Our Feeds
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles β€’ Alerts β€’ Expert Advice
Daily Newsletter
Weekly Newsletter
California Newsletter
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • HR Policy Samples
  • HR Guidebook
  • Employment Contracts
Home > Federal Law Articles > Employee Benefits > Benefits - 403(b)

Articles Discussing 403(b) Plans.

Guidance to Make Us Feel More SECURE

Posted: September 8, 2020 | Jackson Lewis Category: Benefits - 403(b)

Notice 2020-68 from the IRS provides valuable clarification for sponsors of qualified plans, 403(b) plans, and 457(b) governmental plans, as well as IRA holders, related to certain provisions in the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act) and the Bipartisan American Miners Act of 2019.

A

March 31st Deadline for 403(b) Plan Sponsors

Posted: March 30, 2020 | Jackson Lewis Category: Benefits - 403(b)

March 31st Deadline for 403(b) Plan Sponsors

If your organization sponsors a 403(b) plan for employees and has not adopted an up-to-date written plan document that complies with the applicable regulations, you have until March 31, 2020 to do so.  Failure to do could cause substantial negative tax consequences for

Important Guidance and Relief for 403(B) Plan Sponsors Who Exclude Part-Time Employees

Posted: December 17, 2018 | Jackson Lewis Category: Benefits - 403(b)

In the spirit of the holidays, the Internal Revenue Service gave a gift to sponsors of 403(b) tax-deferred annuity plans on December 4, 2018, by issuing IRS Notice 2018-95. For plan sponsors that exclude part-time employees from their 403(b) plans, this gift provides a 10-year nod on their historical plan administration, despite noncompliance with the once-in-always-in part-time exclusion condition.

UPDATE ON UNIVERSITY SECTION 403(b) CASES: INCONSISTENT RULINGS

Posted: May 18, 2017 | Jackson Lewis Category: Benefits - 403(b)

As a result of rulings on motions to dismiss within a day of each other (May 10 and 11, 2017, respectively), Emory University and Duke University must continue to defend claims challenging aspects of their Section 403(b) retirement plans in plaintiffs’ proposed class actions: Henderson v. Emory Univ., N.D. Ga., No. 1:16-cv-02920-CAP; and Clark v. Duke Univ., M.D.N.C., No. 1:16-cv-01044. As we have previously reported, these cases are two out of a series of twelve proposed class actions filed against the retirement plans of 12 prominent American universities, challenging various aspects of plan management, including excessive fees and fiduciary prudence.

Primary Sidebar

Employee Benefits Article Index

  • Benefits – 401(k) (39)
  • Benefits – 403(b) (4)
  • Benefits – ACA (160)
  • Benefits – Cafeteria Plans (2)
  • Benefits – Deferred Compensation (4)
  • Benefits – Defined Plans (3)
  • Benefits – ERISA (110)
  • Benefits – Executive Compensation (20)
  • Benefits – Fiduciary (17)
  • Benefits – Form 5500 (10)
  • Benefits – General (257)
  • Benefits – HIPAA (65)
  • Benefits – HSAs (5)
  • Benefits – Multi-Employer Plans (48)
  • Benefits – Retirees (68)

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

July 2025
SMTWTFS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 
« Jun    

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC β€’ P.O. Box 45, Chinchilla, PA 18410 β€’ 570-301-6277 β€’ info@elinfonet.com