• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Join Our Network
  • Affiliate News
  • Email Newsletters
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Employment Law Information Network

All Things Labor and Employment Law

Get Our Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice
  • Federal Articles
  • State Articles
  • HR News
  • HR Policy Samples
  • Our RSS Feeds

Applicant’s Claim That Racially Biased Safety Officer Cancelled His Split Specimen Drug Test Was Insufficient to Establish Race Discrimination Under Cat’s Paw Theory

Posted: May 10, 2017 | Jackson Lewis Category: Title VII - Employer Liability

An employer that refused to hire an applicant based on a positive pre-employment drug test was entitled to summary judgment on the applicant’s race discrimination and civil conspiracy claims despite the applicant’s argument that the company safety officer cancelled his split specimen drug test due to discriminatory animus, according to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Turner v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, Case No. 15-3263 (7th Cir. Apr. 24, 2017).

Primary Sidebar

Site Search

Connect With Us!

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Article Calander

May 2026
SMTWTFS
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31 
« Apr    

Privacy Policy, Disclaimers & Copyright
elinfonet.com, LLC • 20 N. Broadway, Suite O-373, White Plains, NY • 570-301-6277 • info@elinfonet.com