These types of critiques often leave you feeling like your sensitivity is a weakness and something you need to fix.
Archives for April 29, 2025
How To Make People Indispensable In The Face Of AI
Show your teams how to thrive with AI. Learn how leaders can make people indispensable by investing in skills, empathy, and human strengths at work.
Employer “Reasonable Steps” Under PAGA
In 2004, California enacted the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), which allows employees to sue their employer on behalf of the state for certain Labor Code violations against all aggrieved employees. Prior to the much-needed 2024
Scrapping Nonbinary Marker Risks Muddling EEOC Workforce Reports
Scrapping Nonbinary Marker Risks Muddling EEOC Workforce Reports
Jim Paretti comments on the EEOC’s proposed elimination of the nonbinary identification option from an employer report for workforce demographics.
Bloomberg Law
View (Subscription required)
mfelling@littler.com Tue, 04/29/2025 – 12:35
What’s Behind The Wider Pay Gap Amid Equal Pay Innovation
What’s Behind The Wider Pay Gap Amid Equal Pay Innovation
Kelly Cardin discusses the growing pay gap and says pay transparency laws, data reporting laws and other laws being passed are all chipping away at the problem, although it may take a while yet to see results.
Law360 Employment Authority
View (Subscription
Union Monopolies and Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act: Can Labor Unions Be Held Liable for Monopolizing Labor Markets?
Union Monopolies and Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act: Can Labor Unions Be Held Liable for Monopolizing Labor Markets?
Alexander T. MacDonald discusses union monopolies and whether anti-trust laws apply to them.
The Federalist Society
mfelling@littler.com Tue, 04/29/2025 – 12:27
Ohio first state to allow employers to not post labor, civil rights law notices in workplace
Ohio employers will soon be allowed to forego displaying certain state labor notices in the workplace and instead display them online.
Shareholder Laura Devane Rejoins Littler’s Arbitration Practice
Shareholder Laura Devane Rejoins Littler’s Arbitration Practice
(April 29, 2025) – Littler, the world’s largest employment and labor law practice representing management, has expanded its Arbitration Practice Group with the return of Laura E. Devane as a shareholder in California. Devane, who was previously a shareholder with Littler, rejoins the
What’s the Future of Middle Management?
Predictions about the demise of middle management aren’t new. But with the rise of AI and a trend toward flatter organizations, could these predictions soon come true? Perspectives from three groups of experts suggest that businesses will still need middle managers, particularly when it comes to helping frontline employees shift their roles amid rapid technological and business strategy changes. But it is possible we may need fewer of them in this new environment.
Gen Z college grads expect to earn more than $100,000 at their first job. Their actual paycheck is a rude awakening
Youthful optimism meets economic reality.
How The $5,000 “Baby Bonus” Could Derail Women’s Careers
The motherhood penalty is devastating and a $5,000 ‘baby bonus’ won’t alleviate the challenges that lay ahead for women after they give birth.
Here’s How To Get The Most Out Of Feedback, Even When Poorly Delivered
Most feedback that comes your way will not be as thoughtful, actionable or constructive as you would wish. This is how to take imperfect feedback and mine for gold.
Federal Agencies Directed to End Enforcement of Disparate Impact Discrimination Claims Under President Trump’s New Executive Order
On April 23, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order entitled “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy” (“Executive Order”). This Executive Order is one in a series issued by President Trump with the goal of eliminating Diversity Equity and Inclusion (“DEI”) policies and practices. This Executive Order focuses on dismantling legal claims for discrimination based on a disparate impact theory of liability.
Under the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), among many other federal and state laws, disparate impact liability exists where a neutral policy or practice is shown to have a disproportionately negative effect on a protected group, such as race, national origin, and gender, regardless of intent. There are various legal defenses to disparate impact claims, including showing that the policy or practice is “job-related” or based on a legitimate “business necessity.”
Notwithstanding available affirmative defenses, the new Executive Order broadly asserts that it will “eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts.” The Order cites concerns that potential disparate impact claims hinder businesses from making hiring decisions, undermine national values, and are contrary to equal protection under the law. For now, the Executive Order does not change existing law authorizing claims for disparate impact liability because such changes must be handled through the formal regulatory rulemaking or legislative process.
The Executive Order also lays out various steps the Trump Administration intends to take to curtail the use of disparate impact claims in the near future. The Executive Order instructs federal agencies (such as the EEOC)not to pursue administrative claims based on disparate impact liability. Next, the Executive Order requires a review of any pending federal investigations, civil suits, injunctions, and positions taken in ongoing cases to ensure they are consistent with the new Order. Agencies may dismiss pending claims and refuse to advance arguments based on a disparate impact theory, although private litigants will be able to continue to use that theory in their claims.
The EEOC has also been directed to issue guidance and technical assistance to employers to find measures to promote equal access to employment for applicants “regardless of whether [they have] a college education.” While a college education is typically considered a neutral job-requirement (that the Executive Order is intended to support), the Executive Order appears to single out college education as one factor that should not impede access to employment generally. The Executive Order did not explain the basis for this provision under the Purpose section (Section 1).
Finally, the Executive Order instructs the Attorney General to repeal or amend regulations that authorize disparate impact liability based on race, color and national origin discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (for institutions that receive federal financial assistance). Similarly, the Executive Order states that the Attorney General should try to curtail any disparate impact laws at the state level, including assessing whether arguments can be made that state laws are preempted by federal law or otherwise violate the Constitution.
Summary
In sum, with this Executive Order, employers can expect to face less scrutiny from the EEOC of their policies and practices based on their alleged disparate impact. Litigants would still be able to rely on existing federal statutes, regulations and a developed body of court decisions endorsing disparate impact theories of liability. State law claims based on a disparate impact theory remain in effect, including in California, where the claim is recognized under state statutes such as FEHA.
We will continue to monitor and report on new developments in this area as further guidance is issued by the administration.
Upcoming Webinar: The Future of DEI for California Employers in a Shifting Legal Landscape
CDF will be hosting a complimentary webinar to further explore the impact of recent federal executive orders, including this latest directive concerning disparate impact claims. Join our panel of CDF attorneys for an insightful discussion on ”Upcoming Webinar: The Future of DEI for California Employers in a Shifting Legal Landscape,” this Wednesday, April 30, from 10-11 am (Pacific) – Register HERE to reserve your spot.
Reprieve Extended? DOL to Halt Efforts to Restore 2024 Minimum Salary Rule for Exempt Employees
TakeawaysThe Trump DOL has officially notified the Fifth Circuit that it intends to reconsider the 2024 final rule raising the FLSA salary level for “white collar” exemptions.It has asked for a litigation stay pending the agency’s further reconsideration of the rule. District courts had enjoined the 2024 final rule, but the Biden DOL appealed the case to the Fifth Circuit.Related links
Federal Courts Temporarily Block Enforcement of U.S. Department of Education “Dear Colleague Letter” Barring “Illegal DEI” in Education and Certification Requirements
On April 24, 2025, two federal district courts issued rulings blocking the U.S. Department of Education from enforcing its directive set out in a February 2025 “Dear Colleague Letter” aimed at eliminating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs in federally funded preschools, k–12 schools and higher education institutions. A third federal court also ruled on the issue, but only to bar enforcement of the Letter’s compliance certification requirement.