join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
Search Workipedia:  
« Go Back

non compete covenants

In the employment context, a non-compete covenant (or clause) is an agreement made between an employer and employee in which the employee agrees to refrain from competing with his or her employer.  Generally speaking, these covenants are only enforceable when they are limited in geographic scope and in duration.  For example, the covenant must only last for a limited amount of time (e.g., three months, one year) and only apply to a specific geographic area (e.g., New York City, tri-State Area).

Each State has developed its own standards for enforcing these covenants, so it is important to understand your particular state law in this area.

Terms of a Non-Compete Covenant

When included within an employment contract, the noncompete clause should contain certain basic elements:

  • The duration of the covenant;
  • The geographic scope of the covenant;
  • The ability of the court to redraft the covenant in order to make it enforceable within the applicable jurisdiction;
  • If required, the consideration offered for the covenant;
  • A statement that the covenant is necessary to protect the employer is legitimate business interest;
  • That the employer will suffer irreparable damage as a result of the competitive behavior;
  • That the employer is entitled to injunctive or other equitable relief in order to protect its legitimate business interest;
  • The employee’s understanding that the restriction is reasonable;
  • The trigger for the covenant;
  • Whether termination without cause is an exception to enforcement of the covenant;
  • That the covenant will survive the expiration of the employment contract and/or relationship;
  • That the employee was afforded an opportunity to consult with counsel.
Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password?I Want To Participate!

Workipedia Navigation

Our Editors:

Most Active Contributors:

How To Contribute


  • Page Views: 0
  • Logged in Attorneys:
  • Total guests:

Ogletree Deakins | California | The Opportunities and Obligations of Venture Capital and Private Equity in the #MeToo Environment (February 01, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | Glimmers of Hope? Pair of Recent PAGA Cases Provide Rare Procedural Victories for California Employers (January 31, 2018)

Ogletree Deakins | California | California’s Salary History Ban: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (January 23, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | The ICEman Cometh? Recent War of Words Puts California Employers in the Crosshairs of National Immigration Debate (January 22, 2018)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | Trial Court Properly Denied Attorneys’ Fees To Plaintiff Who Proved His Termination Was Substantially Motivated By His Disabilities, But Was Not The Prevailing Party At Trial (January 21, 2018)

Ogletree Deakins | California | Cal/OSHA Approves Long-Awaited Housekeeper Injury Prevention Regulations (January 24, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | DLSE Publishes Voluntary Template for Required Employer AB 450 Notice (February 11, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | Cal/OSHA Approves Hotel Housekeeping Injury Standard – Likely to Go Into Effect Later This Year (January 21, 2018)

Ogletree Deakins | California | As Marijuana Shops Thrive, California Employers Revisit Drug Policies (January 18, 2018)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | California Labor Department Releases Form for Employers Responding to Immigration Agency Inspection (February 12, 2018)