join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
Search Workipedia:  
« Go Back

Office Romances

A consensual workplace or office romance is not, in itself, unlawful.  Remember that to be considered sexual harassment, the conduct in question must be unwelcome.  Of course, office romances are serious problems for most employers because the relationships often present more downside risk than upside gain.

Boy gets Girl

Sexual harassment might exist in the workplace as a result of favoritism that arises out of the workplace romance.  For example, a supervisor may unfairly grant benefits to a sexual partner, forcing more difficult work on co-workers.  Such conduct can constitute sexual harassment.

Boy loses Girl

More often than not, a workplace romance turns sour, which can also lead to a harassment claim.  For example, the subordinate may break off the relationship, but the supervisor may continue to make overtures.  While that conduct may have once been welcome, it becomes harassing behavior the minute it becomes unwelcome.

What is a Love Contract?

A “love contract” is an agreement that an employer asks romantically involved employees to sign (also called a “consensual relationship agreement”).  The point is to protect the employer from sexual harassment or other claims.  The contract acknowledges the existence of the relationship, outlines that the employer will not tolerate sexually harassing conduct and requires that a party inform the employer if an harassing behavior is occuring.

Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password?I Want To Participate!

Workipedia Navigation

Our Editors:

Most Active Contributors:

How To Contribute


  • Page Views: 0
  • Logged in Attorneys:
  • Total guests:

Ogletree Deakins | California | The Opportunities and Obligations of Venture Capital and Private Equity in the #MeToo Environment (February 01, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | Glimmers of Hope? Pair of Recent PAGA Cases Provide Rare Procedural Victories for California Employers (January 31, 2018)

Ogletree Deakins | California | California’s Salary History Ban: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (January 23, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | The ICEman Cometh? Recent War of Words Puts California Employers in the Crosshairs of National Immigration Debate (January 22, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | DLSE Publishes Voluntary Template for Required Employer AB 450 Notice (February 11, 2018)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | Trial Court Properly Denied Attorneys’ Fees To Plaintiff Who Proved His Termination Was Substantially Motivated By His Disabilities, But Was Not The Prevailing Party At Trial (January 21, 2018)

Ogletree Deakins | California | Cal/OSHA Approves Long-Awaited Housekeeper Injury Prevention Regulations (January 24, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | Cal/OSHA Approves Hotel Housekeeping Injury Standard – Likely to Go Into Effect Later This Year (January 21, 2018)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | California Labor Department Releases Form for Employers Responding to Immigration Agency Inspection (February 12, 2018)

Ogletree Deakins | California | As Marijuana Shops Thrive, California Employers Revisit Drug Policies (January 18, 2018)