|
|
|
 State Employment Law Articles
Report Link CA Supreme Court Holds Vulgar Language Insufficient To Support Hostile Work Environment (pdf).Ogletree Deakins - April 28, 2006 The California Supreme Court held that sexually coarse and vulgar language used
regularly in the writers' room of a popular television situation comedy did not create a hostile work
environment under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television Prods., ___ Cal.4th ___ (April 20, 2006). Report Link Workplace Romance Presents Liability Risk For California Employers (pdf).Ogletree Deakins - August 10, 2005 The California Supreme Court recently
issued an eagerly-anticipated
decision pertaining to sexual harassment
claims brought under California’s
Fair Employment and Housing Act
(FEHA). The justices held that widespread
sexual favoritism in the workplace
may create a hostile worker environment
that demeans other employees. Report Link Workplace Romance May Create Hostile Work Environment for Unaffected Employees.Jackson Lewis LLP - July 26, 2005 California's Supreme Court has unanimously decided that favoritism shown an employee in a romantic relationship with a supervisor may, if sufficiently widespread, create an actionable hostile work environment resulting in unlawful harassment of other employees. The court found the basis for potential sexual harassment liability even when no objectionable conduct is directed at the other employees. Report Link Employers Face Greater Risk from Workplace Romance: California Supreme Court Rules That Office Affairs May Give Rise to Sexual Favoritism Claims.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - July 25, 2005 Employees in California may now sue their employers for sexual harassment if a sexual affair between a supervisor and a subordinate results in “sexual favoritism” creating a hostile work environment for those employees not involved in the affair. A unanimous California Supreme Court in Miller v. Department of Corrections held that consensual sexual affairs may constitute sexual harassment if “sexual favoritism” – giving preference with regard to the terms of employment to a lover to the detriment of other employees – is sufficiently widespread to create an actionable hostile work environment under California’s unlawful harassment law. Report Link New California Law Mandates Anti-Harassment Prevention Training for Supervisors.Jackson Lewis LLP - October 04, 2004 On September 30, 2004, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger enacted AB 1825, a bill that now requires certain California employers to provide two hours of anti-harassment training every two years. Report Link California Supreme Court Rejects Federal Defense to Harassment Claims.Jackson Lewis LLP - January 07, 2004 In one of the year's most eagerly anticipated employment law decisions, Department of Health Services v. Superior Court of Sacramento County (McGinnis), the California Supreme Court recently refused to adopt the federal Faragher/Ellerth defense to harassment claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). Report Link "Worthy Question -- California Supreme Court Should Decide Applicability of Federal Defense" Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - January 24, 2002 California courts have been wrestling with whether to adopt the federal rule on vicarious liability in sex harassment cases.
|
Count and Sub-TopicsArticles Found: 7NO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
Employment Law 101 for HR Professionals
Las Vegas
March 23, 2010 Fisher & PhillipsCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To ComplyNewport Beach
March 23, 2010 Fisher & PhillipsCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To ComplySan Francisco
March 23, 2010 Fisher & Phillips2010 Public Sexual Harassment Training for supervisors and managers.Glendale
March 23, 2010 Ballard Rosenberg2010 Employment Law UpdateSan Jose
March 23, 2010 LittlerHow to Prepare a Response to a DFEH/EEOC ChargeWebinar
March 23, 2010 Shaw ValenzaTOP 10 TIPS FOR CREATING A BLOGGING, SOCIAL MEDIA AND CELL PHONE POLICYOnline
March 23, 2010 HR Learning Center LLCNegotiating Your Business to the TopOrlando
March 23, 2010 Ford & HarrisonCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To ComplySan Diego
March 24, 2010 Fisher & PhillipsEmployment Law Breakfast Briefings`Kenner
March 24, 2010 Fisher & Phillips |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2010 elinfonet.com, llc.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds