|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
State Employment Law Articles
Report Link Terminated College Professor Must Challenge Tenure Hearing.Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - October 30, 2002 A California Court of Appeal ruled a college professor could not bring a claim for wrongful termination since he had failed to challenge the college's internal hearing procedure which supported the termination. Report Link Employee Fired For Discussing Bonus Can Sue For Wrongful Termination.Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - September 01, 2002 A California appellate court held that employees have the right under the Labor Code to discuss their wages. Accordingly, an employer who fires an employee for participating in a group discussion about the fairness of a bonus can sue for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. Report Link Employer Does Not Violate “Fundamental Public Policy” When It Terminates An At-Will Employee Who Sues A Customer For Work-Related Injuries [PDF File, p. 3].O'Melveny & Myers LLP - July 15, 2002 The California Court of Appeal recently held that it was not a violation of a fundamental public policy for a hospital to terminate the employment of an at-will employee for bringing a personal injury action against a former patient who had assaulted her during the course of her employment. Report Link California Supreme Court Holds That Catholic Hospital Is Exempt From Public Policy Claim For Terminating Employee For Using Objectionable Religious Speech.Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - June 20, 2002 In Silo v. CHW Medical Foundation, et al., 2002 DJDAR 5354 (May 17, 2002), the California Supreme Court, held that as a matter of law CHW Medical Foundation could not be held liable for public policy wrongful termination for terminating an employee for engaging in religious speech in the workplace. Report Link Ninth Circuit Upholds Contract Limiting Time For Employees To Sue [PDF File].O'Melveny & Myers LLP - October 01, 2001 Discusses Soltani vs. Western and Southern Life Insurance Company, (9th Cir. August 7, 2001), in which the court held that an employer may contract with employees for a shorter statute of limitations for employee lawsuits. Report Link Termination of Physician Who Questioned Medically Appropriate Health Care for Patient May Have Violated Public Policy [PDF File].Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP. - January 01, 2001 Discusses Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group, 84 Cal.App. 4th 32 (2000) in which the Court reversed nonsuit on the ground that Bus.
& Prof. Code § 2056 prohibits the termination of a physician’s employment for advocating medically appropriate health care.
|
Count and Sub-TopicsArticles Found: 6NO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
TOP TEN WAYS TO VIOLATE WAGE-HOUR LAWS
Sacramento
September 9, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsLos Angeles
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsCosta Mesa
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsSacramento
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsSan Francisco
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPEmployee vs. ContractorColumbia
September 9, 2008 Nexsen PruetEmployee Free Choice Act: Labor’s Attack on Your Employees’ Right to ChooseOnline
September 9, 2008 McGuire WoodsThe Connecticut Sexual and Other Harassment Education and Training in the Workplace ActStamford
2008-9-10 Jackson Lewis LLPHOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONSSan Francisco
September 11, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLPEmployee vs. ContractorGreenville
September 11, 2008 Nexsen Pruet |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2006 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds