|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
State Employment Law Articles
Report Link Supreme Court Overturns California "Union Neutrality" Law Ending Restraint of Employer Free Speech Regarding Union Issues. (pdf).Jackson Lewis LLP - July 23, 2008 Agreeing with the position taken by Jackson Lewis
before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the United
States Supreme Court struck down California’s
“union neutrality” statute on the grounds that it interfered
with an employer’s federally protected right to
freely speak to employees regarding the disadvantages
of unionization. Report Link California Supreme Court Holds that California Constitution Allows Union to Urge Mall Customers to Boycott Store.Ford & Harrison LLP - January 09, 2008 In Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board (12/24/07), the California Supreme Court held that the right to free speech granted in the California Constitution gives a union the right to urge customers in a shopping mall to boycott one of the stores in the mall. Report Link Divided California High Court Rules Union Free Speech Rights Outweigh Mall's Private Property Interests.Jackson Lewis LLP - January 03, 2008 In a rebuke to California employers facing union campaigns or other disputes with organized labor, the California Supreme Court ruled in a 4-to-3 decision issued on December 24, 2007, that a shopping mall's prohibition against unions and other third parties from urging consumer boycotts of mall tenants was contrary to the state Constitution's right to free speech. The court in Fashion Valley Mall v. National Labor Relations Board plainly summed up its decision, stating, "the right to free speech granted by article I, section 2 of the California Constitution includes the right to urge customers in a shopping mall to boycott one of the stores in the mall." Report Link A Corporation Is Not Liable For Actions of An Out-of-State Corporation Even If They Share A Majority of Shareholders (scroll down).Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - December 20, 2007 In District Council No. 16 v. B & B Glass, the Ninth Circuit held that a union could not hold a corporation liable under a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) for the actions of another entity where the corporation had no control or ownership over the other entity. Report Link Employee Not Barred From Bringing Job Bias Claim After Filing Grievance Under Union Contract.Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - November 15, 2007 In Ortega v. Contra Costa Community College Dist., the California Court of Appeal has held that a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) grievance procedure will not eliminate an individual’s right to pursue his claim for employment discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) in court, unless there is a “clear and unmistakable” waiver of this right in the CBA, and the procedures of the arbitration allow for “full litigation and fair adjudication of the FEHA claim.” Report Link SEIU Joins Forces with Nurses Association to Boost Organizing Clout Against California Health Care Employers.Jackson Lewis LLP - March 17, 2004 In December 2003, the Service Employees International Union and the California Nurses Association announced the creation of a "cooperation agreement" to conduct coordinated organizing efforts in California and to work together on legislative, policy and collective bargaining issues.
|
Count and Sub-TopicsArticles Found: 6NO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE
Sacramento
December 2, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLPCalifornia Workplace Law Update 2008Los Angeles
2008-12-2 Jackson Lewis LLPCalifornia Workplace Law Update 2008Costa Mesa
2008-12-2 Jackson Lewis LLPCalifornia Workplace Law Update 2008Sacramento
2008-12-2 Jackson Lewis LLPCalifornia Workplace Law Update 2008San Francisco
2008-12-2 Jackson Lewis LLPCalifornia Workplace Law Update 2008Sacramento
2008-12-2 Jackson Lewis LLPCalifornia Workplace Law Update 2008San Francisco
2008-12-2 Jackson Lewis LLPThe Generation Wars: Tips for Effectively Managing Generational Differences in the WorkplaceMinneapolis
December 2, 2008 Fredrikson & ByronLegally Required Sexual Harassment Training - California LocationsOntario
December 2, 2008 Fisher & PhillipsThe Generation Wars: Tips for Effectively Managing Generational Differences in the WorkplaceMinneapolis
December 2, 2008 Fredrikson |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2008 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds