|
|
|
 State Employment Law Articles
Article Index » oregon: 10 Most Recent Articles Report Link New Oregon Law Prohibits Most Employment Credit Checks.Fisher & Phillips, LLP - March 02, 2010 Most Oregon employers who review job applicants' credit history reports before deciding whether to hire them will no longer be able to do so as of July 1, 2010. Billed as a means to help out-of-work Oregonians find jobs more easily, the Oregon legislature passed a new law on February 22 which will greatly restrict your ability to perform credit checks on applicants and employees. Once signed into law by the Governor (which is expected), Oregon will become the third state in the country – joining Washington and Hawaii – to prohibit this common practice. Report Link Oregon Law Bars Employers' Mandatory Meetings on Unionization, Requires Posting of Notice.Jackson Lewis LLP - January 14, 2010 On January 1, 2010, Oregon Senate Bill 519 became effective, making Oregon the first state in the country to bar employers from requiring employees to attend meetings to learn about the company’s views about unionization. The law has several components, including the creation of a new classification of wrongful termination lawsuits and the requirement that all Oregon employers post a notice advising employees about their rights under SB 519. Report Link Oregon Legislative Update July 2009.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - July 13, 2009 The national drive toward improved health care coverage and education coupled with Oregon's beleaguered economy provided most of the legislative thunder for the state's 2009 session. While employment law issues were not completely absent, much of that legislation centered on creating jobs in a state where the unemployment rate is second only to Michigan's. Report Link Employer Speech in Oregon's Workplaces, the Impact of SB 519.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - July 02, 2009 Oregon's Governor Ted Kulongoski (D) signed SB 519 on June 30, 2009. The new law, referred to by its opponents as the "Employer Gag Bill," and heralded by its supporters as the "Worker Freedom Act," prohibits employers from mandating employee attendance at meetings involving an employer's opinions regarding religious or political matters and prohibits employers from taking any adverse employment action against employees who decline to attend those meetings. One of the practical effects of the law is to try and impose a substantial change to union organizing campaigns in Oregon's workplaces. The law is effective January 1, 2010. Report Link New Labor-Backed Oregon Legislation Probably Preempted by Federal Law.Jackson Lewis LLP - June 29, 2009 Organized labor’s primary goal for the 2009 Oregon bi-annual legislative session was to pass a law barring employers from conducting mandatory meetings or otherwise communicating with employees about their views on whether employees should unionize. This came in the form of Senate Bill 519 (SB 519). On June 22, 2009, the Oregon House of Representatives passed SB 519 by a 34-24 vote. Earlier, the Senate had passed the bill by a narrow 16-14 vote. If signed by Governor Ted Kulongoski, the law would go into effect January 1, 2010. Report Link Oregon Employment Law Developments: Meal Periods, Family Leave and Smokefree Rules.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - February 18, 2009 On January 12, 2009, Oregon's Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) clarified meal and rest period requirements in situations where it is an "undue hardship" for an employer to provide a 30-minute, uninterrupted meal period to its employees. Starting on March 16, 2009, if employers wish to rely on the "undue hardship" exception, they must provide written notice on required BOLI forms to affected employees. Report Link Oregon's Minimum Wage Increased Again: Happy New Year.Fisher & Phillips, LLP - January 05, 2009 Oregon's minimum wage increased forty-five cents, from $7.95 to $8.40, effective January 1, 2009. The increase comes thanks to an Oregon statute requiring the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) to calculate a minimum-wage adjustment each September. The adjustment is based on any increase during the previous 12 months in the U.S. City Average Consumer Price Index (CPI). Report Link Oregon Employers Lose Latest Round of Medical Marijuana Battle.Fisher & Phillips, LLP - June 12, 2008 On June 11th, the Oregon Court of Appeals dealt a blow to employers fighting medical marijuana in the workplace, letting stand an administrative decision which had granted a victory to a medical marijuana user (Emerald Steel Fabricators, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor and Industries). Although the decision was largely based on technical grounds, the Court of Appeals passed up an opportunity to side with employers and the decision may lend comfort to workers’ advocates who support looser workplace drug rules. Report Link Oregon Supreme Court Puts the 'Breaks' on Rest Period Claims.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - May 22, 2008 In a decision that is sure to please Oregon employers, the Oregon Supreme Court, in Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center , held that Oregon employees do not have a private right of action to recover wages for rest period claims brought under Oregon wage and hour laws. Report Link Oregon Supreme Court: No Private Right of Action for Missed Rest.Jackson Lewis LLP - May 19, 2008 Although the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) has promulgated regulations which require every Oregon employer to provide employees ten-minute rest periods for every segment of four hours of work, the Oregon Supreme Court has held that a violation of BOLI's rest period regulations does not give rise to a private right of action for unpaid wages. Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hosp. & Med. Ctr., __ P.3d __ (May 15, 2008). While Oregon employers should remain vigilant in ensuring employees are provided mandatory rest breaks, the Supreme Court's decision all but forecloses the prospect of class action litigation based on rest period violations.
|
Count and Sub-TopicsArticles Found: 10NO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
Employment Law 101 for HR Professionals
Las Vegas
March 23, 2010 Fisher & PhillipsCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To ComplyNewport Beach
March 23, 2010 Fisher & PhillipsCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To ComplySan Francisco
March 23, 2010 Fisher & Phillips2010 Public Sexual Harassment Training for supervisors and managers.Glendale
March 23, 2010 Ballard Rosenberg2010 Employment Law UpdateSan Jose
March 23, 2010 LittlerHow to Prepare a Response to a DFEH/EEOC ChargeWebinar
March 23, 2010 Shaw ValenzaTOP 10 TIPS FOR CREATING A BLOGGING, SOCIAL MEDIA AND CELL PHONE POLICYOnline
March 23, 2010 HR Learning Center LLCNegotiating Your Business to the TopOrlando
March 23, 2010 Ford & HarrisonCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To ComplySan Diego
March 24, 2010 Fisher & PhillipsEmployment Law Breakfast Briefings`Kenner
March 24, 2010 Fisher & Phillips |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2010 elinfonet.com, llc.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds