Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Seminars
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Get Our FREE Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Email:
Over 8,300 Subscribers! More Information
State Employment Law Articles
Article Index » ohio » age discrimination
Report Link Ohio Age Discrimination Law Claim Barred by Arbitration Award Sustaining Employee's Dismissal.
Jackson Lewis LLP - September 14, 2009
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that employees are prohibited from pursuing a claim for age discrimination under a section of Ohio’s fair employment practice statute (Revised Code § 4112.99) when a discharge has been arbitrated and found to be for “just cause.” Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 104 (2009). The Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling provides clarity for age discrimination claims under Ohio law.
Report Link Age Discrimination Claims Under Ohio Law May Be Barred By Internal Grievance Process.
Baker Hostetler LLP - June 10, 2009
On June 2, 2009, the Ohio Supreme Court held that an age discrimination claim filed by a former employee of United Parcel Systems (“UPS”) was barred because an earlier internal “arbitration” proceeding found that the employee had been terminated for just cause. The Court’s decision in Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-2463, highlights the importance of an appropriate internal grievance process in defending a lawsuit alleging age discrimination and offers clarification on Ohio’s unique statutory framework for age discrimination claims.
Report Link No Wrongful Discharge Claims Under Ohio Public Policy Against Age Discrimination.
Jackson Lewis LLP - October 18, 2007
Offering some comfort to employers and closing a loophole for plaintiffs, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that plaintiffs cannot assert a claim for wrongful discharge based on Ohio's public policy against age discrimination. Leininger v. Pioneer Nat'l Latex, 2007-Ohio-4921. As a result, plaintiffs must bring such claims under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4112 or the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Furthermore, by analogy, the Leininger decision should also invalidate public policy wrongful discharge claims based on other forms of employment discrimination and retaliation.

Count and Sub-Topics

Articles Found: 3
SUBTOPICS
  • General
  • Statute of Limitations
  • Employment Law Seminars
    Top Tips to Protect Your Workplace From Violence
    Webinar
    November 10, 2009

    HR Learning Center LLC

    Workplace Change in the Obama Era
    Columbus
    November 10, 2009

    Littler

    2009 Employment Practices Conference
    Universal City
    November 10, 2009

    Ballard Rosenberg

    Fall Employment Law Mini-Series
    Tysons Corner
    November 10, 2009

    Littler

    Business Continuity During the H1N1 Outbreak
    Webinar
    November 10, 2009

    Littler

    "Action Steps for Upcoming Open Enrollment" Free E-Briefing
    Webinar
    November 10, 2009

    Ford & Harrison

    Labor and Employment Law Seminar
    Los Angeles
    November 11, 2009

    Ogletree

    HR Network 2009 | Reston
    Reston
    November 12, 2009

    Cooley

    The Labor & Employment Compliance Costs of Federal Contracting
    Webinar
    November 12, 2009

    Littler

    California Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late to Comply
    La Jolla
    November 12, 2009

    Fisher & Phillips


    Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

    Copyright © 2009 elinfonet.com, llc.
    All Rights Reserved.

    The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

    This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

    All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.