list in directory join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
State Articles > New Jersey > sex discrimination > Pregnancy Discrimination

Total Articles: 1

Pregnant Employees Entitled Only To Equal, Not Preferential, Leave Rights.

Ogletree Deakins • July 27, 2005
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled yesterday that the sex discrimination provisions of the state’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD) do not require an employer to provide pregnant employees more leave than other employees, if the employer applies its medical leave policy in a gender neutral and consistent fashion. According to the Court, “if an employer treats its pregnant employees no differently than comparable non-pregnant employees in need of extended medical leave, then the LAD is not transgressed.” The decision by a narrow 4-3 majority is a significant victory for New Jersey employers and provides long awaited clarification of a murky issue.
Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password? • I Want To Participate!

• Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP | Retaliation Redux: Two cases that should scare employers a lot (February 06, 2012)

• Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP | 2011 Decisions of Interest (February 09, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | Employees Must Be Given Clear, Actual Notice of FMLA Policies (February 01, 2012)

• Franczek Radelet P.C | Giants Beat Patriots in the Super Bowl! Can I take FMLA Leave Today? (February 08, 2012)

• Ogletree Deakins | Can A Paid Break Become Unpaid? (February 02, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | Interviewing The Pawn Stars Way (February 02, 2012)

• Ford & Harrison LLP | Title VII Record-Keeping Requirements Extended to GINA (February 06, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | Obamacare By The Numbers (February 03, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | New Clarifications and Guidance on W-2 Reporting (February 03, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | It's 2012 And The NLRB Is Off To A Fast – And Controversial – Start (February 02, 2012)

• Ogletree Deakins | Indiana | Indiana Enacts Right-to-Work Law: Becomes the Only Right-to-Work State in the Central Midwest (February 02, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | New Mexico | Santa Fe Local Ordinance Sets Country's Highest Minimum Wage Requirement (February 02, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | A Moving Target: The California DLSE Modifies Again Its FAQs on California's New Wage Notice Required for Hourly Employees (February 01, 2012)

• Jackson Lewis LLP | Indiana | Indiana Adopts Right-to-Work Law (February 03, 2012)

• Ogletree Deakins | Pennsylvania | Employment at-will remains a viable concept - at least in Pennsylvania. (February 06, 2012)

• Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP | New York | New York’s Marriage Equality Act and its Effect on Welfare and Pension Benefits (February 09, 2012)

• Shaw Valenza LLP | California | REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION AND JOB APPLICANTS (February 09, 2012)

• Ford & Harrison LLP | Virginia | Virginia Supreme Court Overturns Long-Standing Precedent on the Enforceability of Noncompetition Covenants in Employment Agreements (February 08, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | Indiana | Right Here, Right Now: Indiana Passes Right-to-Work Legislation (February 07, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | Indiana | Indiana Enacts Right-To-Work Legislation: Will The Rest Of The Rust Belt Follow? (February 06, 2012)

• Seventh Circuit | Ross v. RBS Citizens N.A. d/b/a Charter One (7th Cir. 2012)

• Fourth Circuit | Wulff v. Sentara Healthcare, Inc. (D. Va. 2012)

• Fifth Circuit | John Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (5th Cir. 2012)

• Third Circuit | Edwards v. Geisinger Clinic, 3d Cir., No. 11-1528, Jan. 23, 2012

• Third Circuit | Haybarger v. Lawrence County Adult Probation & Parole, No. 10-3916 (3d Cir. Jan. 31, 2012)

• Eleventh Circuit | Mulhall v. UNITE HERE Local 355, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 944 (11th Cir. Jan. 18, 2012)

• California | Muldrow v. Surrex Solutions Corporation

• California | Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego

• Pennsylvania | Bricklayers of Western Pennsylvania Combined Funds, Inc. v. Scott’s Development Company (Pa Sup. 2012)

• Sixth Circuit | Donald v. Sybra, Inc., No. 10-2153, 2012 WL 117612 (6th Cir. Jan. 17, 2012)