|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
State Employment Law Articles
Report Link New Jersey: No Unemployment Benefits Where Claimants Took Employer's Voluntary Separation Package.Jackson Lewis LLP - June 25, 2009 A New Jersey appeals court has denied unemployment benefits to 1,100 former managers based on their acceptance of a voluntary severance package. Black-Melone, et al. v. Board of Review, et al., A-0395-06T3 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. June 5, 2009). Affirming a judgment in favor of the former employer, the Court found that the plaintiffs were disqualified from receiving benefits because they “left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work.” Report Link Paid to Picket? N.J. Supreme Court Rules Strikers May Be Eligible for Unemployment Benefits.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - February 13, 2009 In a decision sure to bewilder many New Jersey employers, on January 27, 2009, the New Jersey Supreme Court held in Lourdes Medical Center of Burlington County v. Board of Review that, under certain circumstances, employees who participate in a labor dispute may be eligible to collect unemployment insurance benefits while on strike. Report Link Striking Nurses Entitled to Unemployment Benefits.Ogletree Deakins - February 13, 2009 The New Jersey Supreme Court recently upheld the decision to award unemployment compensation benefits to 240 striking nurses, concluding there was no “stoppage of work” where the hospital continued to operate at full service. Report Link Unemployment Benefits Awarded Where Employer-Initiated Change to Work Schedule Interfered With Employee’s Established Child Care Arrangements.Ogletree Deakins - December 16, 2008 In this matter, the court held that an employer’s unilateral change in an employee’s work schedule constituted good cause for claimant to resign, and would not preclude receipt of unemployment benefits, where the schedule change prevented the employee from picking up her daughter from daycare by the closing time. Report Link Amendment to "Work Stoppage" Disqualification Under Employment Laws Requires Board of Review To Make Factual Finding Regarding Reason For Cessation Of Work.Ogletree Deakins - August 05, 2008 A recent amendment to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(d) created an exception to the well known “work stoppage” disqualification from unemployment benefits where the employer prevents an individual from working. Report Link Agreement Reached Between New Jersey And United States Department Of Labor To Provide Extended Unemployment Compensation Benefits.Ogletree Deakins - August 05, 2008 On June 30, 2008, the State of New Jersey and the United States Department of Labor reached an agreement to provide federally-funded Extended Unemployment Compensation (EUC) benefits for up to 13 additional weeks. Individuals who filed claims dated May 7, 2006 or later, who exhausted their regular state unemployment insurance benefits, and who are still unemployed and looking for work may be eligible for these extended benefits. Such individuals will be notified by mail at their address of record and will be able to file for benefits by completing and mailing the application that will be enclosed with the notice. Report Link Employee Entitled To Unemployment Benefits When His Employer Caused His Transportation Issues.Ogletree Deakins - June 09, 2008 In a rare unemployment benefits case to reach the New Jersey Supreme Court, the Court held that an employee who resigned due to lack of transportation was entitled to unemployment benefits where the transportation problems were caused by the employer’s work schedule changes. Report Link New Jersey Appeals Court Denies Unemployment Benefits to Striking Nurses.Jackson Lewis LLP - July 31, 2007 A unanimous panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed and remanded a determination by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workplace Development ("DOL"), Board of Review ("Board") that striking nurses were entitled to receive unemployment benefits under the New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Act's labor dispute provision, N.J.S.A. 43:12-5(d).
|
Count and Sub-TopicsArticles Found: 8NO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
2010 Ushers In Many Important Changes to Workplace Laws
Columbia
November 20, 2009 Fisher & PhillipsANNUAL EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATESacramento
December 1, 2009 Shaw ValenzaMonthly Webinar: Preventing Workplace Harassment (California and National)Webinar
December 1, 2009 LittlerCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late to ComplySan Francisco
December 1, 2009 Fisher & PhillipsThe Constangy Management Training Center "Employment Law 201"Tampa
December 2, 2009 ConstangyCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late to ComplyOntario
December 2, 2009 Fisher & PhillipsAudio Conference: Employee Caregivers Dealing With DementiaAudio Conference
December 2, 2009 Young ConawayClients, Adversaries and Witnesses: The Ethics of Communication in a Fast-Paced Legal World Web CastWebinar
December 4, 2009 Ford & HarrisonTaking Executive Compensation Hostage; What To DoWebinar
December 8, 2009 Baker HostetlerPREVENTING HARASSMENT AND OTHER EEO ISSUES AT WORK: IT’S ALL ABOUT RESPECT (AB 1825 COMPLIANCE)Sacramento
December 9, 2009 Shaw Valenza |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2009 elinfonet.com, llc.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds