Total Articles: 16
Ford & Harrison LLP • December 29, 2011
xecutive Summary: The Minnesota Department of Human Rights (MDHR) announced last month that it is requiring mediation for every charge of discrimination filed with the Department. Previously, the MDHR only offered mediation for early resolution when both parties agreed.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • October 14, 2011
Recently, the MinnesotaCourt of Appeals, in Matthews v. Eichorn Motors, Inc. (Minn. App. 2011), limited the application of the “aiding and abetting” provisions of the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Minn. Stat. §363A.14. In that case, the plaintiff asserted a sexual harassment claim against her employer, the majority owner and the father of the majority owner.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • September 09, 2011
Twenty-five years ago the Minnesota Supreme Court, in Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of the U.S., 389 N.W.2d 876 (Minn. 1986) adopted the novel (and still somewhat controversial) doctrine of “defamation by compelled self-publication.” In law school, we were taught that defamation is generally defined as a false statement which is communicated to someone other than the plaintiff and tends to harm the plaintiff’s reputation in the community. Typically, there is no “publication,” when the allegedly false statement is made only to the plaintiff.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • April 01, 2011
On Monday, March 21, 2011, Governor Dayton signed into law H.F. 79, which conforms Minnesota’s individual income and corporate franchise taxes to most federal tax law changes enacted between March 18, 2010, and December 31, 2010, but only for the 2010 tax year. Among other changes, the tax bill contains the following benefits-related provisions:
Ford & Harrison LLP • January 03, 2011
Last month, a federal jury in St. Paul awarded a former engineer at Seagate Technology $1.9 million after concluding that his former employer violated a rarely used Minnesota Statute that prohibits the use of knowingly false statements to induce someone into employment.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • December 16, 2010
Employers collect more than 70 percent of all child support paid in Minnesota. Since employers serve such a critical role in the collection of child support, courts impose significant penalties on employers who do not comply with child support laws. In May 2010, the Minnesota Court of Appeals held an employer liable not only for $235,000 in child support that it failed to withhold from a former employees pay more than 20 years ago, but also for $52,753 of the child support recipients attorneys fees incurred during the lengthy collection process.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • September 27, 2010
For some time Minnesota law has given employees who are eligible to vote the right to be absent from work to vote. Until this year, this right to be absent applied only to the morning of election day. During the 2010 session, the Minnesota State Legislature amended the voting leave statute to allow an employee to be absent from work at any time during his or her scheduled hours on election day for the time necessary to appear at the employees polling place, cast a ballot, and return to work. Minn. Stat. 204C.04. The statute does not allow an employer to deny an employee time off to vote even if the employee has sufficient time to vote outside of working hours. The statute continues to provide that the absence must be without penalty or deduction from salary or wages, meaning the employer must pay the employee for the time missed. Additionally, an employer may not directly or indirectly refuse, abridge, or interfere with an employees right to paid voting leave. A person who violates this law is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • June 08, 2010
Its no secret that the approximately 12,000 unionized Registered Nurses who work in Twin Cities hospitals have set Thursday, June 10, 2010 for a one day strike. Unless the parties resolve their differences before then, picketing will almost certainly occur at most local hospitals.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • September 10, 2009
As social networking Web sites like Facebook and MySpace become increasingly pervasive in and around the workplace, employers need to be aware of potential liability for employees publication of private information on such sites.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • April 09, 2009
Two laws were enacted in Minnesota recently relating to health benefit plans that may affect you as an employer.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • January 23, 2009
Under a new requirement that becomes effective January 1, 2009, all individual independent contractors performing commercial or residential building construction in Minnesota must have an Independent Contractor Exemption Certificate issued by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. Employers using independent contractors who do not have the Independent Contractor Exemption Certificate face significant fines and penalties.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • September 22, 2008
As you have no doubt heard, it is now illegal in Minnesota for an individual to text message, e‑mail or access the Internet on a wireless device while driving. Specifically, Minnesota Statute 169.475 makes it illegal to operate a motor vehicle while using a wireless communication device to compose, read, or send an electronic message, when the vehicle is in motion or a part of traffic.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • March 31, 2008
Although federal, state, county, or city affirmative action requirements apply across industries to all employers of sufficient size, two particular industriesbanks and Minnesota medical clinicsoften trigger affirmative action requirements.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • March 31, 2008
By Executive Order of Governor Pawlenty, state contractors and subcontractors must now make two additional certifications. These are that the contractor: (1) complies with the federal Immigration and Reform Control Act of 1986, and (2) uses the E-Verify system established by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Ford & Harrison LLP • June 22, 2007
Employers in Minnesota should be aware of two recently enacted laws that will require them to revise their personnel policies and procedures. One requires Minnesota employers to take steps to protect the privacy of employees social security numbers; the other requires employers to provide notice of Minnesotas Personnel Record Review and Access statute to employees when they are hired and when they are discharged.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • February 09, 2007
Employers know they must comply with numerous state and federal laws. They also know that failure to do so can lead to significant monetary damages and/or other penalties, either by way of employee claims or enforcement actions initiated by state and/or federal agencies. This article highlights three often-overlooked and potentially costly employment requirements.