list in directory join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More

Provision: Enforcement, Choice of Law

Sample Provision

This agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the State of ___________________ and constitute the entire understanding between the parties as of the commencement of the term of the agreement hereunder, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties, and cannot be changed or terminated orally.

Sample Provision

This agreement has been executed by company at company's headquarters and principal executive offices in [specify location]. Company in you agree that your relationship with company is centered in [specify location] and that the weight of your contracts with and obligations to company is also in [specify location]. Any questions or other matter arising under this agreement, whether of validity, interpretation, performance or otherwise, will therefore be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of [specify state] applicable to agreements made and to be performed in [specify state] without regard to [specify state] choice of law rules. All actions and proceedings arising out of or relating directly or indirectly to this agreement will be filed and litigated exclusively in any state court or federal court located in the city or county of [specify city and state]. Company and you expressly consent to the jurisdiction of these courts, agree that venue is proper in these courts and company and you consent to service of process made at your last known address in companies records.

Sample Provision

This agreement shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of [specify state] without reference to principles of conflict of laws.

Sample Provision

This agreement in all matters and issues collateral thereto shall be governed by laws of [specify state] applicable to contracts entered into and performed entirely within the [specify state], with respect to the determination of any claim, dispute or disagreement, which may arise out of the interpretation, performance or breach of this agreement, and will be subject to enforcement and interpretation solely in the appropriate courts of [specify state].

Employment Contract Provision Index

Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password?I Want To Participate!

Ogletree Deakins | Indiana | Indiana Enacts Right-to-Work Law: Becomes the Only Right-to-Work State in the Central Midwest (February 02, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | New Mexico | Santa Fe Local Ordinance Sets Country's Highest Minimum Wage Requirement (February 02, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | A Moving Target: The California DLSE Modifies Again Its FAQs on California's New Wage Notice Required for Hourly Employees (February 01, 2012)

Jackson Lewis LLP | Indiana | Indiana Adopts Right-to-Work Law (February 03, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | Is Rounding of Employee Time Entries Legal in California?--California Supreme Court Orders Appellate Court to Decide (January 31, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | California Court of Appeal Finds Employees Are Exempt Under California's Commissioned Sales Exemption (January 31, 2012)

Ford & Harrison LLP | New York | New York's Wage Theft Prevention Act Requires Notice to Employees (January 30, 2012)

Ford & Harrison LLP | California | Class-Action Antitrust Complaint Alleging an Unlawful Employer "No-Poaching" Conspiracy Appears to Have Survived a Motion to Dismiss (January 30, 2012)

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP | Delaware | Delaware Court of Chancery Issues Guidelines for Attorneys (January 31, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania Court Holds That Trustees May File Mechanics’ Lien to Obtain Delinquent Contributions to Health and Pension Funds (January 30, 2012)