list in directory join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More

Provision: Non-Compete, Reasonableness

Sample Provision

You agree that the restrictions set forth above are reasonable, appropriate unenforceable because:

i. Company is one of the leading companies in its industry in the United States, with locations throughout the United States;

ii. as an integral part of its business, company has expanded a great deal of time, money and effort to develop and maintain confidential, proprietary and trade secret information to compete against similar businesses; this information, if misused or disclosed, could be very harmful to company's business and its competitive position in the marketplace;

iii. your position with company provides you with access to company's confidential and proprietary trade secret information, strategies and other confidential business information that would be of considerable value to competing business;

iv. Company compensates its executives and other associates to, among other things, develop and maintain valuable goodwill and relationships on company's behalf and to develop and maintain business information for companies exclusive ownership and use;

v. Long-term customer and supplier relationships are difficult to develop and maintain and require significant investment of time, effort and expense;

vi. Company is entitled to appropriate safeguards to ensure that you do not use any confidential information given to you during your employment by company or take any other action that could result in a loss of companies goodwill developed on company's behalf and at its expense, and to prevent you and/or any competing business from having an unfair competitive advantage over company;

vii. the amount of compensation and benefits you receive from companies based in considerable part on your express agreement to refrain from competing with company and to maintain the confidentiality of companies proprietary information in accordance with the terms of this agreement;

viii. the limited time period during which you have agreed not to compete with company after leaving company's employment, the limited scope of the restriction and the limited prohibition on your activities are reasonable to ensure company's confidential current and long-term business methods, strategies and plans are not made available to its competitors; and

ix. on balance, in light of your training and background, the restrictions will not pose an undue hardship on you.

Sample Provision

You knowledge and agree that the individualized services and capabilities that you will provide to company under this agreement are of a personal, special, unique, unusual, extraordinary and intellectual character.

Sample Provision

You knowledge and agree that the individualized services and capabilities that you will provide to company under this agreement are of a personal, special, unique, unusual, extraordinary and intellectual character.

Sample Provision

Company has entered into this agreement in order to obtain the benefit of executive's unique skills, talent, and experience. Executive acknowledges and agrees that any violation of this agreement will result in irreparable damage to company and, accordingly, company may obtain injunctive and other equitable relief for any breach or threaten breach of this agreement, in addition to any other remedies available to company.

Employment Contract Provision Index

Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password?I Want To Participate!

Ogletree Deakins | Indiana | Indiana Enacts Right-to-Work Law: Becomes the Only Right-to-Work State in the Central Midwest (February 02, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | New Mexico | Santa Fe Local Ordinance Sets Country's Highest Minimum Wage Requirement (February 02, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | A Moving Target: The California DLSE Modifies Again Its FAQs on California's New Wage Notice Required for Hourly Employees (February 01, 2012)

Jackson Lewis LLP | Indiana | Indiana Adopts Right-to-Work Law (February 03, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | Is Rounding of Employee Time Entries Legal in California?--California Supreme Court Orders Appellate Court to Decide (January 31, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | California Court of Appeal Finds Employees Are Exempt Under California's Commissioned Sales Exemption (January 31, 2012)

Ford & Harrison LLP | New York | New York's Wage Theft Prevention Act Requires Notice to Employees (January 30, 2012)

Ford & Harrison LLP | California | Class-Action Antitrust Complaint Alleging an Unlawful Employer "No-Poaching" Conspiracy Appears to Have Survived a Motion to Dismiss (January 30, 2012)

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP | Delaware | Delaware Court of Chancery Issues Guidelines for Attorneys (January 31, 2012)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania Court Holds That Trustees May File Mechanics’ Lien to Obtain Delinquent Contributions to Health and Pension Funds (January 30, 2012)