join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More

Provision: Non-Compete, Reasonableness

Sample Provision

You agree that the restrictions set forth above are reasonable, appropriate unenforceable because:

i. Company is one of the leading companies in its industry in the United States, with locations throughout the United States;

ii. as an integral part of its business, company has expanded a great deal of time, money and effort to develop and maintain confidential, proprietary and trade secret information to compete against similar businesses; this information, if misused or disclosed, could be very harmful to company's business and its competitive position in the marketplace;

iii. your position with company provides you with access to company's confidential and proprietary trade secret information, strategies and other confidential business information that would be of considerable value to competing business;

iv. Company compensates its executives and other associates to, among other things, develop and maintain valuable goodwill and relationships on company's behalf and to develop and maintain business information for companies exclusive ownership and use;

v. Long-term customer and supplier relationships are difficult to develop and maintain and require significant investment of time, effort and expense;

vi. Company is entitled to appropriate safeguards to ensure that you do not use any confidential information given to you during your employment by company or take any other action that could result in a loss of companies goodwill developed on company's behalf and at its expense, and to prevent you and/or any competing business from having an unfair competitive advantage over company;

vii. the amount of compensation and benefits you receive from companies based in considerable part on your express agreement to refrain from competing with company and to maintain the confidentiality of companies proprietary information in accordance with the terms of this agreement;

viii. the limited time period during which you have agreed not to compete with company after leaving company's employment, the limited scope of the restriction and the limited prohibition on your activities are reasonable to ensure company's confidential current and long-term business methods, strategies and plans are not made available to its competitors; and

ix. on balance, in light of your training and background, the restrictions will not pose an undue hardship on you.

Sample Provision

You knowledge and agree that the individualized services and capabilities that you will provide to company under this agreement are of a personal, special, unique, unusual, extraordinary and intellectual character.

Sample Provision

You knowledge and agree that the individualized services and capabilities that you will provide to company under this agreement are of a personal, special, unique, unusual, extraordinary and intellectual character.

Sample Provision

Company has entered into this agreement in order to obtain the benefit of executive's unique skills, talent, and experience. Executive acknowledges and agrees that any violation of this agreement will result in irreparable damage to company and, accordingly, company may obtain injunctive and other equitable relief for any breach or threaten breach of this agreement, in addition to any other remedies available to company.

Employment Contract Provision Index

Fisher Phillips | California | California Supreme Court Embraces Employee-Friendly Formula For Calculating OT Pay (March 05, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | FEHC Proposes Regulations to Implement California’s New “Ban the Box” and “New Parent Leave” Laws (March 04, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | Your Comprehensive Guide to 2018 Proposed California Legislation (February 28, 2018)

FordHarrison LLP | California | California Supreme Court's Recent Overtime Ruling Likely to Cause Payroll Problems (March 07, 2018)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | California Court of Appeals Holds Labor Code § 558 Claims Are Indivisible Claims and Not Arbitrable (February 28, 2018)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | Calculating Overtime Value of Flat-Sum Bonus Must Be Based on Actual Non-Overtime Hours Worked, California High Court Holds (March 11, 2018)

Fisher Phillips | California | The Plot Thickens: Trump Administration Sues California Over New Immigration Laws, Including AB 450 (March 09, 2018)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | Pending California Legislation Alert! Recently Introduced Bill Seeks to Protect Medicinal Marijuana Users from Employment Discrimination in California (February 27, 2018)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | California Transportation Industry Waives Goodbye to Enforcement of Federal Arbitration Act Provisions in Employment Contracts (March 07, 2018)

Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP | California | California Proposes New Regulations on Parent Leave and Criminal History Inquiries (March 14, 2018)