Relying heavily on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforcement guidance, a federal appeals court in San Francisco has held that a physical capacity examination administered to an employee who had been on a medical leave of absence was an impermissible “medical examination” under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., No. 08-35278 (9th Cir. Sept. 28, 2009). The Court reversed summary judgment in favor of the employer. The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction over Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
While a contractor’s responsibility for wage and hour violations can vary depending on the statute(s) involved and the factual circumstances, the FLSA and other statutes help make it clear that a general contractor has some incentive to monitor and try to prevent some of these wage and hour violations. Remember: for liability under the FLSA, you can be liable if you have shown “reckless disregard” for the law. In general, you may first protect yourself by knowing the law. Second, you can prevent some problems through your contract. Third, a general contractor needs to preserve the distinction between its operations and the operations of its subcontractors. Fourth, it is wise for general contractors to make reasonable efforts to have their subcontractors obey applicable wage and hour laws.
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC November 11, 2009
On October 28, 2009, the President signed the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that included provisions expanding Family and Medical Leave Act military family leave benefits. The 2010 NDAA extends FMLA exigency leave coverage to family members of active duty members of the Armed Forces. It also expands the potential period during which FMLA caregiver leave might be provided. Now, eligible employees may take FMLA caregiver leave for up to five years after the veteran ends active duty. The expanded FMLA rights are effective immediately. Employers should amend their FMLA policies to reflect these expanded military family leave rights.
Thanks to Facebook, a Canadian insurance company has revoked the disability benefits of a woman who had been out of work for more than a year and a half due to depression. Former IBM employee Nathalie Blanchard, 29, claims that she called her insurance company when her monthly sick-leave checks stopped coming and was told that she was deemed as able to return to work based on what it had found on her Facebook page.
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP November 20, 2009
In order to weather the dire state of the economy, many employers have been forced to eliminate and/or consolidate positions in an effort to reduce costs. Inevitably, when positions are eliminated and employees are laid off, questions arise regarding the legality of the employment decisions. In this regard, far too often, employers’ efforts to defend lay off decisions are complicated by incomplete, inaccurate performance reviews.
Elarbee, Thompson, Sapp & Wilson, LLP. November 17, 2009
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has revised its "Equal Employment Opportunity is the Law" poster. The new poster reflects the requirements of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ("GINA"), which take effect on November 21, 2009, and prohibit employers from discriminating against applicants and employees based on genetic information for employment purposes and health insurance. The new poster will also reflect the changes made by the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008, which took effect on January 1, 2009.
A new federal posting requirement becomes effective November 21. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has revised its "Equal Employment Opportunity is the Law" poster. This new version reflects current federal employment discrimination law, including the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008. The poster also was revised to add information about the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, which also is effective November 21, 2009. The revised poster also includes updates from the Department of Labor.
New York Labor Law Section 195 became effective on October 26, 2009. (See our September 3, 2009, "NY Employers Must Now Advise New Hires in Writing Rate of Pay" advisory.) Pursuant to Section 195, New York employers must provide new employees with written notice of: (1) pay dates; (2) regular hourly pay rates; and (3) overtime rates of pay for all employees eligible to receive overtime compensation. Section 195 requires employers to provide this information before an employee starts working, to obtain written acknowledgements from employees confirming that they received the required notification, and to keep the signed statements for six years.
In March 2009, New York State Department of Labor Commissioner M. Patricia Smith convened a Wage Board to examine the Wage Orders currently applicable to New York State restaurant and hotel employers. In late September, the Wage Board proposed significant changes to the Wage Orders and provided the Commissioner with proposed language for a Wage Order combining the current restaurant and hotel industry wage orders. (See our article, New York State Wage Board Approves Revised Hospitality Industry Wage Order.) On November 5, 2009, Commissioner Smith issued an Order accepting many of the Wage Board’s recommendations, while rejecting the Wage Board’s proposed Wage Order.
Effective October 26, 2009, New York employers are required to notify all new hires in writing of their hourly rate, overtime rate (if applicable) and payday and receive a written acknowledgment of such notification. The enactment indicated that the Department of Labor would provide guidelines to assist employer compliance.
When an employer grants a reasonable accommodation to a disabled employee, what happens if an uninformed supervisor later fails to provide that accommodation? In a recent California case titled A.M. v. Albertsons LLC, that very thing happened, and the employer was held liable for failing to provide an accommodation. The case offers important lessons for employers who offer accommodations to disabled employees.
Recently, the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (NJ DOL) issued regulations interpreting New Jersey's newly implemented paid family leave law, formally known as the "Family Leave Insurance Law." The new regulations provide guidance on important aspects of family leave insurance ("FLI") benefits.
A California Chamber of Commerce-supported bill that protects businesses from meritless lawsuits was signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger last week.
Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt November 16, 2009
The New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (NJDOL) continues to provide employers with additional information regarding the new Paid Family Leave Law. Both English and Spanish language version posters are now available on the NJDOL’s website. Also, a detailed new Question and Answer sheet is available, which provides important payroll information (including how to report employee contributions on Form NJ927 and W-2s).
New Jersey Prohibits Sex Offenders from Working for Youth Organizations; Proposed Amendment Redefines “Misconduct” for Unemployment Benefit Disqualification Purposes; NYS DOL Issues Required Notice and Acknowledgement Form that New York Employers Must Use When Hiring New Employees; “Nurse Coverage Plans” Mandatory for Involuntary Overtime in New York; Release Valid Under OWBPA Where Plaintiff Was Given Appropriate Time to Consider It, Notwithstanding He Signed It Immediately Due to His Own Poor Financial Condition; New Jersey Supreme Court Holds Defendants Cannot Recover Fees in CEPA and LAD Cases under Offer of Judgment Rule; ADEA Claim Fails Where Employer Had Numerous Reasons to Fire Employee; Age Clearly Not the “But For” Factor in Termination.
The California legislature proposed a number of new labor and employment laws in 2009. However, as the politicians battled through a major budget meltdown, the bills either stalled in committee or were vetoed by the governor. Below is a summary of the more significant ones.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.
All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.