![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sexual Harassment - Commentary
It is imperative that employers establish and maintain a strong policy prohibiting sexual harassment. Under the recent United States Supreme Court decisions in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth and Faragher v. City of Boca Raton an employer may successfully defend against a supervisor’s sexual harassment if it can demonstrate that: (i) it exercised reasonable care to prevent and promptly correct the harassing conduct; and (ii) the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of preventative or corrective opportunities. Obviously, to establish the second prong of the defense, the employer must prove that the complaining employee knew of preventative or corrective opportunities, such as a complaint procedure contained in anti-harassment policy. Generally, the employee manual is the main vehicle by which the employer disseminates its anti-harassment policy, and, therefore, an employee manual that does not contain a sexual harassment policies does an employer a disservice. The actual content of a sexual harassment policy will, in part, vary from employer to employer. The Supreme Court has made plain that the policy must suit the employment circumstances. Thus, a anti-harassment policy for home health care workers, or outside salespeople (who do not have a static worksite) may differ from a policy for bank tellers. Regardless, at minimum, the policy should contain the following elements:
These are basics of a sexual harassment policy. Other provisions may be necessary depending on the individual employer. Finally, some anti-harassment policies include provisions regarding false accusations. These provisions state that "if an investigation results in a finding that the complainant knowingly made a false sexual harassment complaint, the complainant will be appropriately disciplined, up to and including discharge." While not unlawful, these provisions are unnecessary and potentially problematic. If the investigation does reveal that the complaining employee knowingly made a false accusation, the employer can take appropriate steps at that time. Foreboding disciplinary action towards complaining employees may chill their willingness to complain and, therefore, may leave some sexual harassment undetected. Even complaints that appear frivolous should be investigated.
|
|
|
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2008 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | |||