http://www.elinfonet.com/starticles/15 Articles discussing workplace law in Indiana. Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:08:23 EST en-us http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=2200 Article: 2200 Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) A trial court allowing an expert to characterize a workplace incident as “an episode of workplace bullying” and refusing to instruct the jury that there is no “workplace bullying” cause of action did not require reversal of a $325,000 jury verdict for the plaintiff, the Indiana Supreme Court concludes. http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=2182 Article: 2182 Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) In a 4-1 decision, the Indiana Supreme Court upheld a $325,000 verdict against a cardiovascular surgeon accused of being a “workplace bully.” Previously, the trial and appellate court decisions in the case had received nationwide attention because of the interest in the concept of “workplace bullying.” Raess v. Doescher, No. 49S02-0710-CV-424, Indiana Supreme Court (April 8, 2008). http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=2141 Article: 2141 Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) Returning to work is often cited as one of the main reasons that nursing mothers discontinue breastfeeding. Now, a growing number of states - in recognition of the health benefits of breastfeeding for the nursing mother and child - have passed specific laws giving nursing mothers the right to breastfeed and/or express breast milk in the workplace. In the past year alone, the following jurisdictions became breastfeeding-friendly for working mothers: the District of Columbia, Montana (public employers only), New Mexico, New York, and Oregon. Wyoming and Arkansas passed general laws in 2007 stating that a mother has a right to breastfeed an infant child in any public places where the mother may legally be or where others are present, which does not expressly specify, but could be interpreted to include, places of employment. http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=1901 Article: 1901 Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) The ongoing war in Iraq has spurred several states to approve legislation creating workplace leave entitlements for individuals with family members in the military. Following that trend, mid-sized and larger employers in Indiana now are required to provide job-protected leave to eligible employees with family members on active duty in the U.S. armed forces and the Indiana National Guard. http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=1892 Article: 1892 Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) Governor Daniels recently signed the Indiana Military Family Leave Act, which will take effect July 1, 2007. The Act permits certain relatives of military personnel to take an unpaid leave of absence of up to 10 working days if a relative is ordered to active duty. The Act requires employers to continue the employee's healthcare benefits at the employee's expense and reinstate the employee when the leave ends. Employers that violate the Act can be ordered to provide "any ... equitable relief that is just and proper under the circumstances." This could include reinstatement of terminated employees and backpay. Employers should take steps now to comply with the Act and to ensure that their rights under the Act are protected. http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=1589 Article: 1589 Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) Employers may use money to reduced use. http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=1473 Article: 1473 Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) The Indiana Court of Appeals recently dismissed a lawsuit brought by an employee who sued his employer for retaliatory discharge. According to the court, the employee failed to show that his working conditions were so intolerable that a reasonable employee would have felt compelled to quit. http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=1327 Article: 1327 Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) The Indiana Court of Appeals recently held that workers’ compensation benefits should be awarded under the “positional risk” doctrine in a case where an employee was shot while at work. Further, according to the court, the state Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board properly awarded these benefits to the deceased worker’s family. http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=1242 Article: 1242 Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) Court Finds Employee’s Possession Of Information After Quitting Was Improper. http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?stateID=1074 Article: 1074 Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:00:00 EST elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network) In a recent unanimous decision, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that employers may be held liable for knowingly misrepresenting a former employee's misconduct or poor performance in an employment recommendation, but declined to adopt the tort of negligent representation in the context of job references.