<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Human Resources Articles - HR Articles</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/fedindex/12</link>
<description>Human resource articles discussing topics covering employee relations and other workplace issues.</description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:11:17 EST</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-us</language>


<item>
<title>Perils of Laoyffs, Reduced Workweeks and Other Payroll Reductions Measures.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8689</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8689</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Today's difficult economic and financial climate has many companies considering various cost-cutting measures, including layoffs, reduced workweeks, pay reductions and voluntary furloughs. These actions raise wage and hour questions that often are overlooked. The unwary employer may reduce payroll costs but wind up with a wage and hour lawsuit as a result. The good news is that a well-informed employer can avoid such risks.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Managing Whiners and Complainers: How to Handle Disgruntled Employees.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8687</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8687</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Almost every workplace has one - the disgruntled employee who frequently complains to supervisors and co-workers.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Contract and Tort Claims.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8677</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8677</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Most employers train their managers and supervisors on applicable federal, state, and local anti-discrimination laws. But a much smaller number of employers conduct training on general contract and tort law that may also serve as a basis for employment-related lawsuits. (Lawyers struggle to define precisely what a “tort” is, but it generally means a wrongful act that is not based on a contract.) Because contract and tort claims can prove every bit as problematic — and costly — as anti-discrimination claims, however, employers should incorporate training in these areas of the law into their management training. </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>But I Received a Glowing Performance Review!</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8676</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8676</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>In order to weather the dire state of the economy, many employers have been forced to eliminate and/or consolidate positions in an effort to reduce costs. Inevitably, when positions are eliminated and employees are laid off, questions arise regarding the legality of the employment decisions. In this regard, far too often, employers’ efforts to defend lay off decisions are complicated by incomplete, inaccurate performance reviews.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Regulations Governing Genetic Questions Are Issued: Employers Must be Wary of GINA.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8675</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8675</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Although the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008 took effect on May 21, 2008, the regulations have taken some time for the various Departments of the government to write and develop. Recently, the Internal Revenue Service, though the Department of the Treasury, issued a set of regulations governing subtitle K of GINA, effect the type of questions that employers may ask of employees and potential new hires and candidates for employment. Subtitle K covers group health plan requirements originally regulated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Privacy Patrol: Guidelines for Complying with the New Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8670</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8670</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>As of Nov. 21, employers are required to comply with yet another law that restricts disclosure of employee health information. The new law will join others already on the books that require HR leaders to exercise discretion and vigilance when it comes to dispersing and safeguarding such information. However, a few misconceptions about medical-privacy laws and the workplace need to be clarified.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Defamation Lawsuits Remain a Concern for Employers.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8655</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8655</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>Although many employers today
are warily watching the
legislative horizon for laws
creating new protected classes
(sexual orientation,
whistleblowers) and expanding
limitations periods (Ledbetter),
they would do well to remember
that increasing numbers of
employees are turning to
defamation claims to redress
damage allegedly done to their
reputation by discipline and
discharge decisions. Because
these claims are often fi led in
state court, where the judges
are often more hesitant to grant
summary judgment, the juries
typically more generous, and
the damages uncapped, there is
signifi cant risk for employers.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Expanded Whistleblower Protections under the Amended FCA.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8654</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8654</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>With examples of corporate
malfeasance dominating the
news, blowing the whistle is
more popular than ever.
Retaliatory discharge lawsuits
brought by whistleblowers,
however, are nothing new.
Such claims have an
understandable jury appeal;
nobody seems surprised that a
company, or a rogue manager,
strikes back after accusations of
wrongdoing. Sound policies and
conscientious compliance
departments can go a long way
towards minimizing liability for
whistleblower claims.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Opening Pandora's Box: Employers and Social Networking Sites.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8653</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8653</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>As the law struggles to keep
pace with the frenetic world of
online networking, employers
must be mindful of the risks
they face by allowing
employees to access social
networking sites such as
Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn.
Using these social networking
sites to “check up” on an
employee, identify or assess
potential employees, or simply
“friend” or link up with a
subordinate entails risks.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Independent Contractor Conundrum.</title>
<link>http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=8651</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">Article: 8651</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<author>elin@elinfonet.com (Employment Law Information Network)</author>
<description>As the recession lingers on,
employers continue to search for
ways to manage operating costs.
One common (but increasingly
risky) cost-cutting measure is the
use of independent contractors in
positions that are normally fi lled
by employees.</description>
</item>
</channel>

</rss>

