list in directory join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
Search HR Guidebook:  
Human Resource Guidebook   •  Title List  •  Categories   •  Recent Changes   •  What Links Here
« Go Back

Sample Policy for Employment of Relatives

COMPANY will gladly accept and consider employment applications from relatives and close family members of its employees.  However, COMPANY shall refrain from hiring and transferring relatives into positions where they will directly supervise or be supervised by another close family member. COMPANY shall also refrain from placing individuals in positions where they work with or have access to sensitive information regarding a close family member. COMPANY’s management believes that this approach will help to prevent problems associated with security, supervision, and morale.

Category:Best Human Resources Practices

Categories:

Lawyer Login: Workipedia • EL Match

Auto-login Show name as online

Forgot your password? • I Want To Participate!

• Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP | When can an employer fire an employee for medical leave fraud? (May 11, 2012)

• Franczek Radelet P.C | Requiring Employees to Return to Work With No Restrictions or To Be "100% Healed" is a Huge Risk for Employers (May 10, 2012)

• Jackson Lewis LLP | Indefinite Leave Not Required under Disability Discrimination Laws Where Employee is Unable to Work (May 02, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | A Supervisor's Guide to Social Media, Part One (May 04, 2012)

• Shaw Valenza LLP | ATTENDANCE AS AN ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTION (May 17, 2012)

• Franczek Radelet P.C | Recent Settlements Agreeing to Pay Overtime for Misclassification of Employees (May 07, 2012)

• Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP | What Dave Barry Taught Me About HR (May 14, 2012)

• Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP | A Little Presentation Humor (May 18, 2012)

• Jackson Lewis LLP | New Limits for Health Savings Accounts and Flexible Spending Arrangements in 2013 (May 03, 2012)

• Jackson Lewis LLP | Employee is Not Disabled under ADA Simply because He Cannot Work Overtime, Federal Court Rules (May 02, 2012)

• Cooley LLP. | California | New California Requirements for Background Check Disclosures (May 15, 2012)

• Ford & Harrison LLP | California | Frequently Asked Questions About the Brinker Decision (May 03, 2012)

• Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP | Texas | Why is Texas No. 1 in discrimination charges filed with the EEOC? (May 22, 2012)

• Fisher & Phillips, LLP | New Jersey | Appeals Court Expands New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (May 07, 2012)

• Barker Olmsted & Barnier | California | Lunch Police Recalled: Cal Supremes Finally Decide Brinker Case (May 04, 2012)

• Brody and Associates, LLC | Connecticut | Connecticut Employers – What Does the New Medical Marijuana Law Mean for You? (May 08, 2012)

• Jackson Lewis LLP | California | Prevailing Parties Cannot Recover Attorney’s Fees for Meal or Rest Violations under California Law (May 09, 2012)

• Ford & Harrison LLP | California | CA Employers Should Start Getting Commission Agreements in Writing (May 11, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | Connecticut | Connecticut Court Restricts Customer and Vendor Information in April Fool's Day Joke Gone Wrong (May 18, 2012)

• Littler Mendelson, P.C. | New York | New York Court: Plaintiff Must Identify Trade Secrets (May 10, 2012)

• Seventh Circuit | EEOC v. Union Road Towing, Inc.

• California | Fitzsimons v. California Emergency Physicians Med. Group, No. A131604 (Cal. App. Dist. 1 Div. 3 May 16, 2012)

• Ninth Circuit | James v. Costa Mesa (9th Cir. 2012)

• Third Circuit | Pellegrino v. Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, CLC, 3d Cir., No.11-2639, April 19, 2012.

• Third Circuit | Knepper v. Rite Aid (3d Cir. 2012)

• Fifth Circuit | Reed v. Florida Metro University, Inc. (5th Cir 5.18.12)

• Second Circuit | Townsend v. Benjamin Enters. Inc., No. 09-197-cv (2d Cir. May 9, 2012).

• Second Circuit | Townsend v. Benjamin Enters. Inc., No. 09-197-cv (2d Cir. May 9, 2012)

• Minnesota | LaMont v. Independent School District #728 (Minn 2012)

• Seventh Circuit | Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Co. (7th Cir. 2012)