join our network! affiliate login  
Custom Search
GET OUR FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTERS!
Daily and Weekly Editions • Articles • Alerts • Expert Advice • Learn More
Search HR Guidebook:  
« Go Back

OSHA Hazard Communication Standard

Overview: Under its federal Hazard Communication Standard (8-24-87), OSHA requires employers in all industries (manufacturing and non- manufacturing) exposed to hazardous substances to educate and train all workers about chemical hazards they may encounter on the job.  The Hazard Communication Standard became fully applicable to the construction industry 1-30-89; the Supreme Court rejected on 2-21-89 the construction industry’s request to delay enforcement of the standard.

Hazard communication requirements.  The Hazard Communication Standard is one of the broadest and most significant workplace health programs to date.  According to OSHA chief Gerard Scannell, more than 13,000 employers were cited in fiscal year 1990 for failing to have a written hazard communication program- more than any other specific OSHA violation.

Preemption of state right- to- know laws.  OSHA’s standard preempts all state or local right-to-know laws except in states where it has approved state programs.

Compliance.  Hazard communication requirements include:

  • logging all chemicals and substances (as defined in the Act) into a chemical inventory;
  • collecting and retaining information on every chemical hazard in the   workplace, in the form of “material safety data sheets” or MSDSs;
  • labeling containers of hazardous substances as to their content and the hazards these substances present;
  • educating and training employees to understand MSDSs, the nature of the hazards of each substance, how to avoid these hazards, and the warning signs associated with exposure to each substance; and
  • preparing a written hazard communication plan that summarizes the employer’s approach, plan for hazard communication, and the designation of key official(s) who will be responsible for implementing and maintaining the program.

Category:Legal Considerations

Categories:

Jackson Lewis P.C. | Washington | Washington Enacts Healthy Starts Act: New Workplace Accommodation Protections for Pregnant Employees (September 11, 2017)

FordHarrison LLP | Florida | Non-Compete News - Florida Supreme Court Holds Referral Sources Are Legitimate Business Interests Under Florida's Non-Compete Statute (September 18, 2017)

FordHarrison LLP | New York | The 2nd Department Rejects NYSDOL's "13 Hours Rule" For 24-Hour Shift Workers (September 17, 2017)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | New York | New York Paid Family Leave Benefits Law Deadline for Employers to Apply for Approval as a Self-Insured Employer Rapidly Approaching (September 13, 2017)

Fisher Phillips | California | The End is Near! – Follow These Labor and Employment Bills as the California Legislative Year Wraps Up (September 06, 2017)

Jackson Lewis P.C. | California | California on Brink of Further Expansion of Fair Pay Protections (September 15, 2017)

Ogletree Deakins | California | San Diego Enacts Pay Equity Ordinance for City Contractors (September 14, 2017)

Goldberg Segalla LLP | Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania Courts Continue to Extend Theories of Liability in Nursing Home Malpractice Cases (August 31, 2017)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | New York | Another New York State Appellate Court Finds 24-Hour Non-Residential Home Care Attendants Must be Paid for Sleep and Meal Periods (September 17, 2017)

Littler Mendelson, P.C. | California | California Countdown: Which Labor & Employment Bills Will the Governor Sign? (September 21, 2017)