The query posed in the original post in this thread appears to be answered in the IRS document that the above posters so graciously linked for us, on pages 5-6 of the PDF:
“Involuntary termination is the involuntary termination of employment, not the involuntary termination of health coverage…If the reduction in hours is not a reduction to zero, the mere reduction in hours is not an involuntary termination. However, an employee’s voluntary termination in response to another employer-imposed reduction in hours may be an involuntary termination of the reduction in hours is a material negative change in the employment relationship for the employee.”
Thus, a reduction in hours is not a qualifying event for the purposes of the subsidy, unless the employee actually quits as a result of the reduction in hours. Any such employees, even if they voluntarily terminated their employment, would be eligible for the subsidy.
Jonathan F. Cohen, Esq.
APRUZZESE, McDERMOTT,
MASTRO & MURPHY,P.C.
Somerset Hills Corporate Center
25 Independence Boulevard
P.O. Box 112
Liberty Corner, NJ 07938
Tele: (908) 580-1776
Fax: (908) 647-1492
email: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)