Total Articles: 24
Littler Mendelson, P.C. • January 13, 2012
After a trial to the court in September 2011, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio entered judgment on January 5, 2012 in favor of Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, on all claims alleged against it by a nationwide class of Special Investigators who claimed they were misclassified as exempt from the overtime requirements of the FLSA and New York and California state wage laws.
Franczek Radelet P.C • January 05, 2012
Imagine you are the personal assistant for the world’s most famous artist, Lady Gaga. You have the opportunity to travel the world, meet famous people and watch your boss hit the button to drop the “ball” in Times Square on New Years Eve. What could be better? Well, apparently, being paid overtime.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. • December 09, 2011
The First Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that banquet sales managers qualified for the administrative exemption to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The court reached this holding in the case of Hines v. State Room, Inc. even though the banquet sales managers were bound by a price schedule established by their employer and therefore had virtually no authority to make financial decisions.
Shaw Valenza LLP • September 19, 2011
The State of Washington's Department of Social and Health Services employ social workers, whom the agency classifies as exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The state relies on the "learned professional exemption," which means "an employee whose primary duties require 'knowledge of an advanced type in a field of science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction.'” 29 C.F.R. § 541.300(a)(2)(I).
Littler Mendelson, P.C. • September 19, 2011
A social worker required to hold a bachelor’s degree in social or human services, behavioral science or an allied field does not necessarily qualify as a “learned professional,” properly exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Ninth Circuit recently held in Solis v. State of Washington DSHS (No. 10-35590 (Sept. 9, 2011).
Fisher & Phillips, LLP • July 20, 2010
In a major decision with possible relevance outside of the pharmaceutical industry, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Connecticut, New York, and Vermont) gave strong deference to a U.S. Labor Department legal brief and overruled a lower court in deciding that Novartis's pharmaceutical sales reps were not exempt from overtime as outside salespersons or as administrative employees under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act or applicable state laws. On the same day, the Second Circuit also summarily ruled against Schering in a similar case.
Fisher & Phillips, LLP • July 07, 2010
When classifying their employees for overtime purposes under federal and state wage-hour laws, employers often rely on the equivalent of the "Duck Test": the job's title sounds professional and its duties require expertise and a high degree of skill it sounds and looks like a professional job, and so it must qualify for the professional exemption even if most of its occupants lack advanced degrees. In other words, they assume that when a high degree of skill and years of experience are needed to perform the position's essential tasks, and the position requires either advanced education or long years of experience, the occupants can be treated as exempt professionals under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Ogletree Deakins • February 16, 2010
Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employees who work more than 40 hours a week are entitled to overtime pay unless they fall under one of the Acts enumerated exemptions. The 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal found that a Johnson & Johnson sales representative fell within the administrative exemption, based upon that persons high level of planning and foresight, along with her exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance and, therefore, was not entitled to overtime pay.
Ogletree Deakins • February 08, 2010
Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employees who work more than 40 hours a week are entitled to overtime pay unless they fall under one of the Acts enumerated exemptions. The 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal found that a Johnson & Johnson sales representative fell within the administrative exemption, based upon that persons high level of planning and foresight, along with her exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of significance and, therefore, was not entitled to overtime pay. Smith v. Johnson & Johnson, 3d Cir., No. 09-1223, February 2, 2010.
Fisher & Phillips, LLP • May 06, 2008
Anyone who has ever undertaken the task of analyzing the applicability and implications of "white collar" exemptions under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) knows that it usually requires a multi-tiered, multi-page flow chart, not to mention a great deal of patience. But there is some good news for schools: the exemption analysis for teachers is less complicated because there is no requirement to the meet the "salary basis" test under the FLSA.
Fisher & Phillips, LLP • March 14, 2008
We wish there were an easy and certain answer to the above question, but the reality is that court decisions in this area differ in both analysis and results even given similar factual scenarios. For some time now we have been talking about the huge increase in overtime cases and other actions being filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and similar state wage and hour laws. No area of employment litigation has been more active recently than wage and hour litigation. In 2007 the steep increase in FLSA lawsuits filed continued as did payouts, collectively totaling over a billion dollars.
Ogletree Deakins • December 06, 2006
DOL opinion letter finds store manager qualified for executive exemption.
Jones Walker • August 15, 2006
Nearly two years have passed since the DOL revised the regulations interpreting the
white-collar exemptions from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA). The regulations primarily focused on administrative, executive, and professional
employees. Based on the revised regulations, many companies tweaked their exempt
classifications.
Vedder Price • July 19, 2006
Most employers know that an employee must
meet certain duties tests to qualify for the white
collar exemptionsexecutive, administrative and
professional. It is important not to overlook another
requirement for these exemptions: the employee must
be paid on a salary basis. This means that the employee
generally must receive the same fi xed amount of salary
regardless of the quantity or quality of work performed
in the workweek. The salary basis requirement can be
understood as a general rule with seven exceptions.
Vedder Price • April 07, 2006
Over the past nine months, Merrill Lynch, Morgan
Stanley and UBS have settled Fair Labor Standards Act
and state law overtime lawsuits for a combined total of
more than $160 million. Plaintiffs in the lawsuits claimed
that the companies stock brokers and financial advisors
were incorrectly classified as exempt white collar
employees and thus were due overtime pay. Copycat
suits have been filed against other brokerage companies,
including A.G. Edwards, Wachovia, Prudential, J.P.
Morgan Chase and Bear Stearns. Given the success
plaintiffs attorneys are having with these cases, more
lawsuits can be expected.
Ogletree Deakins • December 16, 2005
In August of last year, the revised
federal regulations for the white collar
overtime pay exemptions under the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) took
effect. The final rule, which is now
commonly referred to as the Part 541
regulations, resulted in scores of employers
scrambling to ensure that their
exempt employees were properly classified.
More than one year later, employers
continue to seek clarification on the
new Part 541 regulations and other
common wage and hour issues.
Vedder Price • April 27, 2005
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has issued
several new administrative letter rulings discussing the
recently revised Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
white-collar exemption regulations that took effect
August 23, 2004. Several other letters address longstanding,
but often-confusing FLSA issues.
Jones Walker • November 15, 2004
The U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) new "whitecollar" regulations went into effect
August 23, 2004. While the regulations are more of a cosmetic touch-up as opposed to an
extreme makeover, many of you have questions about their implementation and effect on your
full-time and part-time employees. Were here to shed some light on some of the most frequently
asked questions regarding the new regulations.
Vedder Price • October 05, 2004
As most employers now know, final regulations pertaining
to the Fair Labor Standards Act white-collar exemptions for
overtime eligibility went into effect on August 23, 2004.
Jones Walker • August 24, 2004
On April 23, 2004, the Department of Labor ("DOL") issued its final version of the regulations governing which employees are entitled to overtime. These rules go into effect on August 23, 2004. There are some significant changes with regard to the overtime regulations covering executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, and computer employees, typically known as "white collar" employees.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • June 24, 2004
The federal Department of Labor recently issued new regulations governing the so-called "white collar exemptions" under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The regulations take effect August 23, 2004.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • May 24, 2004
The DOL recently issued new regulations governing the so-called "white collar exemptions" under the FLSA.
Vedder Price • May 21, 2004
The House of Representatives voted 222 to 205 on Wednesday, May 12, to table a procedural motion by Rep. George Miller (D-CA), which could have resulted in a vote, preventing the implementation of the new overtime regulations.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. • August 27, 2003
Employers may soon need to review the "exempt" and "non-exempt" classification of employees under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to determine whether they are correctly paying them.