|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Report Link Appeals Court Says Company Policy Restricting Overtime Does Not Trump Compensation Obligations.Jackson Lewis LLP - February 08, 2008 A federal appeals court in New York has ruled that the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") requires employers to pay one-and-a-half times the regular rate of pay as compensation to employees who perform overtime work even though the work was not authorized and was in violation of company policy. The case, Chao v. Gotham Registry, Inc., No. 06-2432-cv (2d Cir. Jan. 24, 2008), dates back to 1992 when the Secretary of Labor sued Gotham Registry, Inc. ("Gotham"), a staffing agency, for not paying overtime wages to the nurses it employed. Report Link Calculating Overtime Pay Under the FLSA (pdf).Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. - January 04, 2008 Here are the core rules for determining whether non-exempt
employees have in fact worked overtime and, if so, how
much overtime pay they are due. Report Link Supreme Court FLSA Decision Relieves Domestic Service Industry: Deference to DOL Regs a Good Sign (pdf).Vedder Price - August 31, 2007 The companionship service exemption spares from
the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime provisions
employees who provide in-home companionship
services to elderly or infi rm persons unable to care for
themselves. Report Link Ninth Circuit Finds Employees' Claims for Overtime Compensation Related to Time Spent Traveling to and From Work Meeting Sites are not Pre-Empted by the LMRA.Ford & Harrison LLP - June 22, 2007 In Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corporation (June 20, 2007), the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal held that claims brought by a class of unionized employees relating to compensation for time spent attending and traveling to and from company-mandated meetings were not pre-empted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), even though the issue was expressly addressed in the various pertinent collective bargaining agreements (CBAs). Accordingly, the Ninth Circuit remanded the action to state court. Report Link Court Rules Sick Day Buyouts Must Be Included in Overtime Pay Calculation.Jackson Lewis LLP - March 08, 2006 As a general rule, employers do not take into account payments for unused sick days when calculating overtime wages for departing employees. A recent decision by the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit calls that practice into question. The case involved firefighters in Columbia , Missouri , who had "banked" sick time and were eligible to participate in a sick day cash-out program. Report Link Self-Storage Managers' Overtime Claims Dismissed By Court (pdf).Ogletree Deakins - June 03, 2005 The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently rejected a lawsuit brought by two employees who claimed that they were denied overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
According to the court, the employees were “fully compensated under the terms of a reasonable employment agreement between the parties.” Report Link Are You Paying the Correct Amount of Overtime?Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. - March 11, 2005 If asked, most employers will say that non-exempt employees must receive overtime for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek. Most employers also will say that the amount of overtime due is one- and-one-half times the employee’s hourly rate. But wait, is this second statement correct? Report Link New Overtime Regulations Clear Final Hurdle (pdf).Jones Walker - October 22, 2004 On August 23, 2004, the long awaited "section 541" overtime
regulations finally became effective after avoiding last-ditch attempts in
Congress to scuttle them. Report Link White-Collar Exemption Changes [PDF File, .1]Jones Walker - July 24, 2003 The United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) recently issued proposed changes to the regulations governing which employees are entitled to overtime. Report Link Labor Department Proposes Changes to 50-year Old Wage and Hour Rules on Exempt Employee Status.Jackson Lewis LLP - April 01, 2003 On March 31, 2003, the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division issued Proposed Rules and Request for Comments regarding modifications to the definitions of exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 C.F.R. § 541). Report Link Employers' Questions About FLSA's Overtime Requirements Are Answered.Semmes Bowen & Semmes - January 01, 2003 Many employers continue to raise questions about the FLSA’s overtime requirements. Report Link Minimum Wage Page.Department of Labor - December 01, 1999 DOL's page dedicated to minimum wage. Report Link Overtime Pay Requirements Of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Department of Labor - (No Date) Fact Sheet No. 023. This fact sheet provides general information concerning the application of the overtime pay provisions of the FLSA. Report Link Overtime Topic Page.Department of Labor - (No Date) DOL's Topic Page on federal overtime pay, which includes brief discussion of overtime, related DOL web pages and applicable laws and regulations.
|
ArticlesFound: 14 ArticlesNO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
43rd Annual Midwest Labor and Employment Law Seminar on October 12-13, 2008
Easton
October 12, 2008 Baker HostetlerReserve the Dates!!! – Public Sexual Harassment Training Webinar for Supervisors and ManagersOnline
October 14, 2008 Ballard RosenbergThe 2008 Nevada Employer: RenoReno
October 14, 2008 LittlerSouth Carolina's Immigration Law, I-9 & E-Verify Breakfast BriefingSpartanburg
October 14, 2008 Ford & HarrisonEmployment Law WorkshopLa Jolla
October 14, 2008 Fisher & PhillipsHiring minors: Legal issues to considerPhiladelphia
October 14, 2008 Buchanan IngersollEmployment Law Developments in IndianaCarmel
October 15, 2008 OgletreeEmployment Law Developments in TennesseeNashville
October 15, 2008 OgletreeWorkplace Harassment SeminarIndianapolis
October 16, 2008 Indiana Chamber of CommerceFlorida Employment Law UpdateTampa
October 16, 2008 Ogletree |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2008 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds