|
|
|
Report Link Tenth Circuit Endorses "Fluctuating Workweek" Method of Calculating Overtime for Misclassified Salaried Employees.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - July 14, 2008 In a decision that could lead to significant litigation cost savings for employers, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit endorsed the "fluctuating workweek" method of calculating back pay awards for misclassified salaried employees in lawsuits arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In Clements v. Serco, Inc., 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13806 (10th Cir. July 1, 2008), the Tenth Circuit held that the district court properly used the fluctuating workweek method to calculate a back pay award for unpaid overtime, rather than the alternative "time-and-a-half" formula, because the parties had a "clear mutual understanding" that the plaintiffs would be paid a fixed salary regardless of the number of hours they worked each workweek. In addition, the court joined the First and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals in rejecting the proposition that the fluctuating workweek method applies only where the parties also had a "clear mutual understanding" as to how overtime pay would be calculated. Report Link Courts Approve Method for Calculating Overtime that Can Reduce Overtime Costs (pdf).Vedder Price - July 19, 2006 The FLSA normally requires employers to pay
nonexempt employees time and one-half their regular
rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek.
Under the “fl uctuating workweek” method, however,
employers who meet certain requirements may pay
nonexempt employees a fi xed salary for all hours
worked and compensate them at one-half their
regular hourly rate for all hours worked over 40 in the
workweek. This can mean less overtime pay for the
employee and less overtime expense for the employer. Report Link Alternative Workweek Schedules: What Are the Rules?Jackson Lewis LLP - April 12, 2005 The maximum number of daily hours that may be regularly scheduled as part of an alternative workweek is currently the subject of debate. For most employers, the California DLSE has taken the position that the maximum number of daily hours regularly scheduled in an alternative workweek is 10. Report Link 29 CFR 778.114 - Fixed salary for fluctuating hours.Department of Labor - (No Date) FLSA regulation regarding the payment of a fixed salary for fluctuating hours.
|
Articles Found: 4 ArticlesNO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
Total Wage and Hour Compliance: An Initiative to End the Wage and Hour Class Action Wars
Sacramento
October 7, 2008 LittlerTaking Your Health Plan's Temperature- Keeping The Plan Out Of Trouble (pdf).Tampa
October 7, 2008 ConstangyEmployment Law Developments in ArizonaScottsdale
October 7, 2008 OgletreeSuccessfully Navigating the Bermuda Triangle of Time Away from WorkAtlanta
2008-10-8 Jackson Lewis LLPFast Forward: Staying Ahead of Emerging Employment IssuesMinnetonka
October 8, 2008 Ford & HarrisonGuidance on the Newly FMLA RegulationsMarion
October 8, 2008 Baker DonelsonElections 2008: Challenges & Opportunities for EmployersBIRMINGHAM
October 9, 2008 ConstangyEmployee Free Choice Act: More Than Just a Misleading Name.Birmingham
October 10, 2008 Littler43rd Annual Midwest Labor and Employment Law Seminar on October 12-13, 2008Easton
October 12, 2008 Baker HostetlerReserve the Dates!!! – Public Sexual Harassment Training Webinar for Supervisors and ManagersOnline
October 14, 2008 Ballard Rosenberg |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2008 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||