Total Articles: 30
Jackson Lewis P.C. • January 20, 2020
Northrop Grumman has agreed to pay $12,375,000 to settle a class action brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) by participants in its 401(k) plan. The parties reached the initial terms of this settlement last year minutes before the start of the trial.
Fisher Phillips • December 04, 2019
We reported last year about the importance of a new retirement system for the gig economy. Typical gig workers are currently not entitled to enjoy a traditional employer-based retirement plan because the law only permits such plans to cover employees and not independent contractors. But the need for gig workers to have opportunities to save for retirement has done nothing but increase in recent years. Research shows that there are 56.7 million freelancers in the United States and Congress has yet to pass legislation creating a retirement system for them.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. • November 06, 2019
It’s that time of year again. On November 6, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced cost-of-living adjustments affecting dollar limitations for pension plans and other retirement-related items for the 2020 tax year. These limits include both employee and employer contribution limits.
Ogletree Deakins • July 28, 2019
ith a recent uptick in mergers and transactions, we thought it would be worthwhile to provide a refresher on some coverage testing issues related to retirement plans.
Ogletree Deakins • April 04, 2019
In 2018, Congress passed legislation and the IRS issued proposed regulations relaxing the requirements for 401(k) plan hardship distributions. In this podcast, David Rosner and Taylor Bracewell follow up on their earlier blog and discuss the previous hardship distribution requirements and how the new guidance will affect 401(k) plans and participants.
Ogletree Deakins • November 30, 2018
Otis Redding and the Black Crowes may have proclaimed themselves “hard to handle now,” but thanks to recent guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), hardship distributions from 401(k) plans are a bit less hard to handle, now.
Jackson Lewis P.C. • September 05, 2018
The IRS has released a Private Letter Ruling (“PLR”) 201833012, in which it approved a student loan repayment program as a 401(k) benefit. Although the PLR can only be applied by the taxpayer/plan sponsor requesting it, it is a promising development for employers seeking to provide stronger incentives for a workforce increasingly saddled with student loan debt.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. • August 12, 2018
In the past two years, more than 16 prominent colleges and universities across the country have been targeted by class action lawsuits filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) challenging the fees and investment lineups in the schools’ retirement plans. On July 31, 2018, a New York federal court issued an opinion and order in favor of NYU in the first of those cases to proceed to trial, Sacerdote v. New York University.1 As the first case to consider the merits of the claims asserted in these ERISA class actions, Sacerdote is not only a significant victory for NYU but also for the other colleges and universities defending similar suits.2
Nexsen Pruet • May 23, 2018
Until recently, the Carolinas were relatively immune to litigation surrounding alleged excessiveness of 401(k) plan fees. But last month in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, employees of big-box retailer Lowe’s filed a complaint alleging that the company’s fiduciary decisions to replace certain investments funds with a “largely untested” and “underperforming” alternative caused the loss of millions of dollars in potential earnings for plan participants. While fiduciary actions are common during economic downturns, this matter – coupled with the development of relevant case law – suggests that allegations involving 401(k) plan costs and lost investment opportunities may become just as common during a boom.
Jackson Lewis P.C. • March 10, 2017
On February 23 and March 7, 2017, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued memoranda to examination agents addressing review of substantiation provided in support of safe harbor hardship distributions under 401(k) and 403(b) plans. Although the memoranda cannot be relied upon as official guidance, they are good reference points to help plan sponsors and third party administrators (“TPAs”) avoid issues on audit.
Jackson Lewis P.C. • March 30, 2016
In the last six months, several clients called me regarding substantial balances in a so-called “forfeiture account” in their 401(k) plans. A few of these clients have forfeiture accounts that violate the ERISA requirements. It is imperative that forfeitures be handled properly since both the IRS and the Department of Labor (DOL) on audit generally review how forfeitures have been handled by the plan.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. • March 11, 2016
The IRS recently added new questions to the 2015 Form 5500/5500-SF annual retirement plan returns. The Form 5500-Series returns are used by retirement plans to report the financial condition, investments, and operations of the plans to the DOL and IRS. When the new IRS compliance questions were originally introduced, the IRS described the questions as optional for plan year 2015. However, in its most recent instructions, the IRS has specifically advised plan sponsors not to complete these questions for the 2015 plan year. The IRS decision to delay completion is due to privacy and misreporting concerns raised by retirement plan administrators and advisors.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. • February 11, 2016
The IRS recently issued Notice 2016-16 (the “Notice”), which permits most mid-year amendments to safe harbor 401(k) plans. This is welcome news to sponsors of safe harbor 401(k) plans who, prior to the issuance of the Notice, faced uncertainty over whether any mid-year changes to their plan would invalidate the plan’s safe harbor status.
Jackson Lewis P.C. • November 10, 2015
Preapproved (prototype or volume submitter) defined contribution plans must be restated for the Pension Protection Act by April 30, 2016.
Franczek Radelet P.C • June 18, 2015
The United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Tibble v. Edison Int’l that a suit alleging a breach of fiduciary duty for failure to properly monitor investment options in a 401(k) plan was not time-barred because it was brought more than six years after the investment options in question were added to the plan. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) contains a six-year statute of limitations with respect to suits alleging breaches of fiduciary duty. The Court stated in its decision that, under trust law, a fiduciary generally has a continuing duty to monitor investment options and remove imprudent ones. The Court held that a lawsuit alleging fiduciary breach is not time-barred so long as the alleged breach occurred within six years of the suit’s filing (even if more than six years have passed since the investment option was added to the plan). The Court, however, did not articulate the scope of a plan fiduciary’s continuing duty to monitor plan investments, leaving this question for lower courts.
Fisher Phillips • May 19, 2015
The U.S. Supreme Court has held unanimously that a plan fiduciary has a continuing duty to monitor investments offered under a 401(k) plan, a duty that is separate and apart from the duty to exercise prudence in selecting investments in the first place.
Fisher Phillips • February 04, 2014
401(k) Plan documents can read like Russian novels. They are often long and difficult to understand, so it’s no surprise that administrative errors in operating such plans happen frequently. Common errors include omitting or including compensation that doesn’t meet the definition in the plan document, failing to enroll a new employee or a rehire on time, and botching participant loans (such as a failure to set up repayment of the loan in payroll on a timely basis or extending the repayment schedule beyond the five-year limit).
Fisher Phillips • February 04, 2014
Most small to mid-size employers sponsoring a 401(k) plan maintain their plan on a pre-approved prototype document. If you’re not familiar with the term pre-approved prototype plan, it consists of a “check the box” document called an Adoption Agreement that is about 25 pages long and a Basic Plan document that can be up to 100 pages long (small type). These two parts comprise the formal written plan document required under ERISA.
Ogletree Deakins • November 22, 2013
On November 14, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued final regulations, which provide guidance on permitted mid-year reductions or suspensions of safe harbor nonelective contributions. The final regulations also revise previous requirements for permitted mid-year reductions or suspensions of safe harbor matching contributions.
FordHarrison LLP • November 15, 2013
On November 14, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations modifying some of the conditions for making mid-year changes to employer matching or nonelective contributions under plans that utilize the nondiscrimination safe harbors under sections 401(k) and/or 401(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. These new regulations make some changes to the existing regulations, and to the proposed regulations that had been issued in 2009.
Franczek Radelet P.C • March 06, 2012
The IRS recently released an interim report summarizing its findings from a â€œcompliance checkâ€ questionnaire that was sent to a broad sampling of 401(k) plans in 2010. The questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 401(k) plan sponsors of all sizes. The response rate was very highâ€”98% of the 1,200 plans that received the questionnaire completed it.
Ogletree Deakins • September 16, 2011
Plan administrators can satisfy fiduciary requirements for disclosures concerning participant-directed individual account plans (the most common example being 401(k) plans) through the use of electronic media in certain circumstances, as described in a Technical Release issued by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) on September 13, 2011. Technical Release 2011-03 provides guidance on using electronic media for plan information disclosures in two situations: 1) when the information disclosed is included in a pension benefits statement; and 2) when the information is disclosed separately from a pension benefits statement. Plan administrators who make the required disclosures in accordance with the Technical Release will not be subject to enforcement action by the DOL. Notwithstanding this guidance, employers should watch out for future guidance as this is merely interim relief and final regulatory guidance is expected in the future.
Ogletree Deakins • June 01, 2010
Approximately 1,200 randomly selected 401(k) plan sponsors received letters, sent during the week of May 17, from the IRS Employee Plans Compliance Unit asking them to complete a 401(k) Compliance Check Questionnaire.
Fisher Phillips • May 11, 2010
The IRS announced last week that it will be looking at 1,200 401(k) plans by way of a plan compliance questionnaire. Letters from the IRS are expected to go out at the end of May. An employer receiving a letter will be assigned a personal identification number (PIN) to use when filling out the questionnaire online. The employer has 90 days to complete the form, but can get an extension. Answering the questionnaire is "technically voluntary," but an IRS spokesperson made it clear that they want the information.
Fisher Phillips • May 04, 2009
Employers wishing to reduce labor costs during these rough economic times may be considering eliminating matching contributions or other employer contributions to their tax qualified profit sharing and 401(k) plans. While its perfectly legal to make such changes, make sure that the plan documentation is properly and timely amended. Plan documentation includes the actual plan document, which can include both an adoption agreement and master plan document for prototype arrangements, and the Summary Plan Description.
Fisher Phillips • July 03, 2008
Last month President Bush signed into law the Heroes Earnings and Assistance and Relief Act of 2008 (HEART or the Heroes Act). The Act's provisions impact benefits under 401(k) plans. In addition, Health FSAs, group health plans, and cafeteria plans may also be impacted by some Heroes Act changes.
Ogletree Deakins • June 25, 2008
Employers that have adopted a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) for their 401(k) plans now have a new resource to help work through potential problems, including issues related to investments that predate the QDIA rules, the coordination of QDIA and other plan-related notices, grandfathered stable value funds, and so-called "round trip" restrictions.
Ogletree Deakins • February 21, 2008
Today, the U.S. Supreme issued its ruling in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc. The high court disagreed with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision that a participant in a 401(k) plan is prohibited from using Section 502(a)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to recover losses allegedly caused by his employer's failure to carry out his investment instructions. "Although [Section] 502(a)(2) does not provide a remedy for individual injuries distinct from plan injuries," the majority wrote, "that provision does authorize recovery for fiduciary breaches that impair the value of plan assets in a participant's individual account."
Fisher Phillips • January 08, 2008
Participant-directed accounts have become the norm in most 401(k) plans. But with the increase in the number of plans utilizing automatic enrollment features, plan fiduciaries should select a default investment for participants who fail to make an election.
Fisher Phillips • October 03, 2007
If you are considering adding automatic enrollment for employees who have not signed up for the 401(k) plan, a new kind of automatic enrollment is available next year. Beginning January 1, 2008, a 401(k) plan can offer a "Qualified Automatic Contribution Arrangement" (QACA) which requires minimum levels of 401(k) deferrals and exempts the 401(k) plan from nondiscrimination and top heavy testing.