|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Report Link Unionized Public Sector Employees Have No Right To Representation At Investigatory Interviews.Jackson Lewis LLP - February 26, 2007 Private sector employees who are represented by a union for collective bargaining have a right to request union representation for meetings with managers where they are likely to be quizzed about workplace misconduct. Under the National Labor Relations Act, if an employee has a reasonable belief that responses to management inquiries might result in disciplinary action, the employee may request a union representative to be present. Report Link Investigatory Interview Representation Rights for Nonunion Workers.Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP - September 21, 2004 In an important decision for
employers, the National Labor
Relations Board recently held
in IBM Corp., 341 NLRB No.
148 (2004) that nonunionized
employees no longer have the right
to have a coworker with them at
an investigative interview, even
when the employee reasonably
believes the investigation might
result in disciplinary action. Report Link Non-Union Employees Not Entitled to Co-Worker Representation, Says NLRB (pdf).Vedder Price - July 26, 2004 Reversing its prior position on this issue, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") ruled that nonunion employees do not have the right to be represented by a co-worker at an investigatory interview that could result in disciplinary action. Report Link NLRB Rules That Weingarten Rights No Longer Apply to Non-Union Workforces.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - June 23, 2004 On June 9, 2004, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) in IBM Corp., 341 NLRB No. 148, overruled its Epilepsy Foundation decision, which had granted non-union employees the right to be represented by a co-worker at an investigatory interview that could result in disciplinary action. Report Link NLRB Rules Nonunion Employees Have No Right to Representation During an Investigatory Interview.Jackson Lewis LLP - June 17, 2004 In a decision which impacts the workplace investigation practices of all employers, the National Labor Relations Board has ruled that nonunion employees do not have the right to have a representative present during an interview that might reasonably lead to disciplinary action. Report Link D. C. Circuit Enforces NLRB Decision Expanding Application of "Weingarten" Rights to Non-Union Employees.Winston & Strawn - November 02, 2001 Discusses Epilepsy Found. of N.E. Ohio v. NLRB, No. 00-1332, (D.C. Cir. November 2, 2001), in which the court upheld the NLRB's ruling that non-union employee are entitled to representation during disciplinary interview. Report Link The Presence of Coworkers During Investigatory Interviews [PDF File].Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP. - November 01, 2000 Lengthy discussion of Epilepsy Foundation of Northeast Ohio, 331 NLRB No. 92 (July 10, 2000), in which the Board ruled that non-union employee are entitled to representation during disciplinary interview. Report Link NLRB Expands Rights of Non-Union Employees: Grants Right to Have Co-Worker Present at Interview.Brigs & Morgan - July 27, 2000 Discusses Epilepsy Foundation of Northeast Ohio, 331 NLRB No. 92 (July 10, 2000), in which the Board ruled that non-union employee are entitled to representation during disciplinary interview. Report Link Unionized Employees' Right to Representation During Investigatory Interview is Expanded to Nonunion Employees.Jackson Lewis LLP - July 01, 2000 Detailed discussion of Epilepsy Foundation of Northeast Ohio, 331 NLRB No. 92 (July 10, 2000), in which the Board ruled that non-union employee are entitled to representation during disciplinary interview.
|
ArticlesFound: 9 ArticlesNO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
43rd Annual Midwest Labor and Employment Law Seminar on October 12-13, 2008
Easton
October 12, 2008 Baker HostetlerReserve the Dates!!! – Public Sexual Harassment Training Webinar for Supervisors and ManagersOnline
October 14, 2008 Ballard RosenbergThe 2008 Nevada Employer: RenoReno
October 14, 2008 LittlerSouth Carolina's Immigration Law, I-9 & E-Verify Breakfast BriefingSpartanburg
October 14, 2008 Ford & HarrisonEmployment Law WorkshopLa Jolla
October 14, 2008 Fisher & PhillipsHiring minors: Legal issues to considerPhiladelphia
October 14, 2008 Buchanan IngersollEmployment Law Developments in IndianaCarmel
October 15, 2008 OgletreeEmployment Law Developments in TennesseeNashville
October 15, 2008 OgletreeWorkplace Harassment SeminarIndianapolis
October 16, 2008 Indiana Chamber of CommerceFlorida Employment Law UpdateTampa
October 16, 2008 Ogletree |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2008 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds