|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Report Link Decrease in Union Election Wins May Mean Organizing Pressure on Employers to Increase.Jackson Lewis LLP - June 06, 2008 For the first time in more than a decade, the rate at which unions won representation elections conducted by the National Labor Relations Board decreased in 2007. The rate of union wins declined to 60.1%, down from 61.4% in 2006, according to a report published by the Bureau of National Affairs on June 2. In 2007, the number of elections won by unions was 902, as compared to 1,018 in 2006. Report Link Labor Board Ruling Stresses Importance of Ballot Secrecy in Setting Aside an Election.Jackson Lewis LLP - January 02, 2008 Adopting a strict standard to protect ballot secrecy, the National Labor Relations Board (the "Board") set aside the results of a union election in which two late-arriving employees cast their ballots outside a voting booth in a public room. The Board found that the employees voted in a manner "entirely too open and too subject to observation to insure secrecy of the ballot," and ordered that a new election be held. Setting aside an election the union won (7 to 6, with 1 void ballot), the Board did not require any evidence showing the latecomers were barred from freely casting their votes. Columbine Cable Company, Inc., 351 NLRB No. 65 (Nov. 30, 2007). Report Link Hospitality Industry: Box Score (Union Elections)Fisher & Phillips, LLP - December 06, 2007 August and September saw a big spike in union petitions at hospitality employers. Here are 17 we are aware of, all filed in the same two-month period. Report Link Distribution of Altered Sample Ballot Not Objectionable if Board’s Newly Revised Sample Ballot is Used.Ford & Harrison LLP - October 26, 2007 The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently announced that it will not set aside a representation election based on a party’s distribution of an altered sample ballot, provided the altered ballot is an actual reproduction of the Board’s recently revised sample ballot, which includes newly added disclaimer language. See Ryder Memorial Hospital, 351 NLRB No. 26 (September 28, 2007). In Ryder, the Board announced that it has revised the sample ballot included with a Notice of Election to include a disclaimer stating: “The National Labor Relations Board does not endorse any choice in this election. Any markings that you may see on any sample ballot have not been put there by the National Labor Relations Board.” Report Link NLRB Dramatically Changes Rules Regarding Union Recognition.Fisher & Phillips, LLP - October 05, 2007 In a decision that overturns more than 40 years of precedent, the National Labor Relations Board announced yesterday that the "recognition bar," which precludes a decertification election for 12 months after an employer recognizes a union, does not apply when that recognition is voluntary, based on a card check. Dana Corp.; Metaldyne Corp. 351 NLRB No. 28 (2007). Report Link Legal Alert: NMB Finalizes Internet Voting Procedures.Ford & Harrison LLP - October 01, 2007 On September 14, 2007, the National Mediation Board (NMB) published its final rules regarding its previously announced intent to introduce Internet Voting in elections overseen by the agency. Effective October 1, 2007, employees in such elections will have the option of voting either by the Telephone Electronic Voting (TEV) system currently in use or via the Internet. Report Link Instead of Bargaining, Labor Board Orders Rerun Election for Hospital's Unfair Practices.Jackson Lewis LLP - December 10, 2004 A Florida hospital that committed numerous unfair labor practices during a union campaign was not ordered to bargain with the union to remedy the violations. Report Link NLRB’s Crown Jewel Tarnished, But Election Results Stand (pdf).Vedder Price - October 05, 2004 During a break in voting, the union’s observer asked the
National Labor Relations Board agent conducting the
election why companies don’t like unions. The Board agent
said, 'Companies don’t like unions because they cannot fire
or hire anyone, and they cannot take benefits from the staff.' Report Link More Elections, More Union Wins in 2002.Jackson Lewis LLP - September 22, 2003 For the sixth straight year, union victories in elections conducted by the National Labor Relations Board have increased.
|
ArticlesFound: 9 ArticlesNO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
TOP TEN WAYS TO VIOLATE WAGE-HOUR LAWS
Sacramento
September 9, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsLos Angeles
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsCosta Mesa
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsSacramento
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsSan Francisco
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPEmployee vs. ContractorColumbia
September 9, 2008 Nexsen PruetEmployee Free Choice Act: Labor’s Attack on Your Employees’ Right to ChooseOnline
September 9, 2008 McGuire WoodsThe Connecticut Sexual and Other Harassment Education and Training in the Workplace ActStamford
2008-9-10 Jackson Lewis LLPHOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONSSan Francisco
September 11, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLPEmployee vs. ContractorGreenville
September 11, 2008 Nexsen Pruet |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2008 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds