Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Forms
HR Seminars
HR Training
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Enter Your Email Address Below!

Daily Weekly  [More Information]
Article Index » labor law » unfair labor practices » Section 8(a)(1)
Report Link NLRB says cleaning company's rules are spotless (pdf).
Jones Walker - April 07, 2006
Employers, even those that are union-free, must comply with the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Under the Act, you can’t discriminate against union members or restrict employees’ right to organize. Union members and organizers often challenge employers’ nonsolicitation and no-access policies as being in violation of those rules under the Act.
Report Link NLRB Finds Employee Confidentiality Requirement Too Broad (pdf).
Vedder Price - August 29, 2005
Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act prohibits an employer from interfering with an employee’s right (guaranteed by section 7 of the Act) to engage in union activity. In a recent NLRB decision, the Board found that a confidentiality provision in an employee handbook prohibiting the release of “any information concerning . . . its partners” (i.e., employees) was overly broad and violated section 8(a)(1). Cintas Corp. and Union of Needletrades, Indus. & Textile Employees, 344 NLRB No. 118 (June 30, 2005).
Report Link Handbook Provision On Union Threats Unlawful (pdf).
Ogletree Deakins - August 11, 2005
A federal appellate court recently held that an employee handbook provision encouraging workers to report any “harassment” by fellow employees to sign union authorization cards violates federal labor law. According to the court, the company’s employees “were not able to discern any limiting principles from the circumstances under which the policy was issued.” This ruling serves as a reminder that harassment policies that deal with protected union activity must be carefully drafted.
Report Link Recent NLRB Decision Places Increased Scrutiny on Confidentiality Policies and Agreements.
Jackson Lewis LLP - August 09, 2005
Unionized and union free employers should review their confidential information policies, confidentiality agreements and related policies (such as business ethics statements with confidentiality provisions) to make sure maintenance of such policies does not violate the National Labor Relations Act. A recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board underscores the risk that such policies may inadvertently infringe on employee rights under the Act, which makes it unlawful for an employer to interfere with, restrain or coerce employees exercising their right to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.
Report Link Labor Board Modifies Its Position on Employee Conduct Rules as Chilling Protected Activity.
Jackson Lewis LLP - February 03, 2005
During the past several years, the National Labor Relations Board has had numerous occasions to rule on the lawfulness of various employer conduct rules, which usually appear in an employer's handbook or policy manual.

Articles

Found: 5 Articles

NO SUBTOPICS

Sort Articles   
  
Employment Law Seminars
Managing Business Exposures Successfully: Are You "All In" For The Continual Wave Of Workplace Risks?
Irving
2008-9-4

Jackson Lewis LLP

TOP TEN WAYS TO VIOLATE WAGE-HOUR LAWS
Sacramento
September 9, 2008

Shaw Valenza LLP

Unlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy Rights
Los Angeles
2008-9-9

Jackson Lewis LLP

Unlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy Rights
Costa Mesa
2008-9-9

Jackson Lewis LLP

Unlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy Rights
Sacramento
2008-9-9

Jackson Lewis LLP

Unlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy Rights
San Francisco
2008-9-9

Jackson Lewis LLP

Employee vs. Contractor
Columbia
September 9, 2008

Nexsen Pruet

Employee Free Choice Act: Labor’s Attack on Your Employees’ Right to Choose
Online
September 9, 2008

McGuire Woods

The Connecticut Sexual and Other Harassment Education and Training in the Workplace Act
Stamford
2008-9-10

Jackson Lewis LLP

HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS
San Francisco
September 11, 2008

Shaw Valenza LLP


Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.