Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Forms
HR Training
HR Seminars
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Enter Your Email Address Below!

Daily Weekly  [More Information]
Article Index » labor law » union organizing » Union Corporate Campaigns
Report Link Company's RICO Case Can Proceed Against Union Waging Corporate Campaign, Judge Says.
Jackson Lewis LLP - June 09, 2008
Refusing to dismiss a civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO") suit against the United Food and Commercial Workers ("UFCW"), a federal judge in Virginia has held that the plaintiff company adequately alleged extortion and a "pattern of racketeering activities" in its complaint against the union and other defendants.
Report Link Labor Board Ruling May Empower More Aggressive Pushback Against Union Corporate Campaign Tactics.
Jackson Lewis LLP - October 12, 2007
Addressing a dispute that began 20 years ago, the National Labor Relations Board has issued a new standard for determining when employer legal action challenging union campaign tactics is lawful. Following a long trail of litigation, including a Supreme Court decision in 2002, in BE&K Construction Co., 351 N.L.R.B. No. 29 (Sept. 29, 2007), the Labor Board has held that "the filing and maintenance of a reasonably based lawsuit does not violate the [NLRA], regardless of whether the lawsuit is ongoing or completed, and regardless of the motive for initiating the lawsuit." This ruling may provide employers with additional tools for pushing back against union corporate campaign tactics through “reasonably based” legal recourse, such as allegations of labor law and antitrust violations, even if ultimately unsuccessful.
Report Link National Labor Relations Board Voids Coerced Union Project Labor Agreement.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. - September 11, 2007
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or "the Board") has released its decision in Glens Falls Building and Construction Trades Council (Indeck Energy Services, Inc.), 350 NLRB No. 42 (2007) that could have a profound effect in slowing the growing use by labor organizations of corporate campaigns to force construction project owners to accept the imposition of costly union-only project labor agreements on their projects.

Articles

Found: 3 Articles

NO SUBTOPICS

Sort Articles   
  
Employment Law Seminars
Employee Free Choice Act Briefing
Jackson
November 21, 2008

Baker Donelson

Protect Your Company and Your Reputation: A Discussion of the Latest Cases, Trends and Developments Relating to Document Retention, Electronic Discovery, and the Rules You Must Know to Protect Your Organization During Employment Litigation
Online
November 25, 2008

Fisher & Phillips

ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE
Sacramento
December 2, 2008

Shaw Valenza LLP

ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE
San Francisco
December 3, 2008

Shaw Valenza LLP

California Workplace Law Update 2008
Los Angeles
2008-12-2

Jackson Lewis LLP

California Workplace Law Update 2008
Costa Mesa
2008-12-2

Jackson Lewis LLP

California Workplace Law Update 2008
Sacramento
2008-12-2

Jackson Lewis LLP

California Workplace Law Update 2008
San Francisco
2008-12-2

Jackson Lewis LLP

California Workplace Law Update 2008
Sacramento
2008-12-2

Jackson Lewis LLP

California Workplace Law Update 2008
San Francisco
2008-12-2

Jackson Lewis LLP


Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.