|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Report Link Employee Posing Safety Risk Created by Extreme Diabetic Episodes is Not Protected by ADA.Jackson Lewis LLP - August 26, 2009 A federal trial court in Iowa has held that a disabled employee with a history of unpredictable hypoglycemic episodes was not protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), because the condition posed a direct threat to the health and safety of other employees at his employer's manufacturing plant. Report Link Arizona Employee Gets Second Chance To Prove Bias (pdf).Ogletree Deakins - May 11, 2006 A federal judge in Arizona recently
held that an employee who suffered
from post traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) may sue for disability bias. According
to the court, the worker presented
sufficient evidence that he suffered
an adverse employment action as
a direct result of his disability. Report Link Attempted Suicide Does Not Derail Lawsuit (pdf).Ogletree Deakins - August 10, 2005 The federal appellate court with
jurisdiction over Tennessee employers
recently ruled in favor of an employee
who had been discharged following
her suicide attempt. According to the
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, the
employer’s perception of the worker’s
disability (resulting from her suicide
attempt) led to her discharge. Report Link Wisconsin Court Rejects "Direct Threat" but Rules Sight Impaired Worker Is Not "Qualified Individual".Jackson Lewis LLP - October 30, 2003 A Wisconsin cheese producer narrowly succeeded in defending the termination of a blind factory worker after the court rejected the employer's defense that the individual posed a "direct threat" to the safety of himself and others in the workplace. Report Link ADA Requires Best Available Medical Information in Making Individualized "Direct Threat" Determination.Jackson Lewis LLP - September 12, 2003 The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that an employer must use the best available medical information when making an individualized assessment under the Americans with Disabilities Act Report Link Posing Direct Threat to Co-Workers Not Qualified.Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - December 14, 2001 Discusses Hutton v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc., 2001 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12416 (9th Cir., November 29, 2001), in which the court held that a diabetic plaintiff was not qualified to perform the essential job functions of a chlorine operator job because he posed a direct threat to co-workers. Report Link Substance Abuse under the ADA.U.S. Commission on Civil Rights - (No Date) Chapter 4 from "Sharing the Dream: Is the ADA Accommodating All?", which covers various topics, including when drug and alcohol users are covered under the ADA, when substance abuse poses a direct threats, what pre-employment inquiries may be asked, and drug testing. Report Link Psychiatric Disabilities and the ADA. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights - (No Date) Chapter 5 from "Sharing the Dream: Is the ADA Accommodating All?"; lengthy discussion of mental disabilities under the ADA, including coverage issues, accommodation, direct threat, and EEOC Guidance.
|
ArticlesFound: 8 ArticlesSUBTOPICS Employment Law Seminars
2010 Ushers In Many Important Changes to Workplace Laws
Columbia
November 20, 2009 Fisher & PhillipsANNUAL EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATESacramento
December 1, 2009 Shaw ValenzaMonthly Webinar: Preventing Workplace Harassment (California and National)Webinar
December 1, 2009 LittlerCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late to ComplySan Francisco
December 1, 2009 Fisher & PhillipsThe Constangy Management Training Center "Employment Law 201"Tampa
December 2, 2009 ConstangyCalifornia Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late to ComplyOntario
December 2, 2009 Fisher & PhillipsAudio Conference: Employee Caregivers Dealing With DementiaAudio Conference
December 2, 2009 Young ConawayClients, Adversaries and Witnesses: The Ethics of Communication in a Fast-Paced Legal World Web CastWebinar
December 4, 2009 Ford & HarrisonTaking Executive Compensation Hostage; What To DoWebinar
December 8, 2009 Baker HostetlerPREVENTING HARASSMENT AND OTHER EEO ISSUES AT WORK: IT’S ALL ABOUT RESPECT (AB 1825 COMPLIANCE)Sacramento
December 9, 2009 Shaw Valenza |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2009 elinfonet.com, llc.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds