Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Seminars
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Get Our FREE Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Email:
Over 8,300 Subscribers! More Information
Article Index » disability discrimination: 10 Most Recent Articles
Report Link Employer's Return-to-Work Evaluation Found Unlawful "Medical Exam" under ADA, Ninth Circuit Rules.
Jackson Lewis LLP - November 06, 2009
Relying heavily on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforcement guidance, a federal appeals court in San Francisco has held that a physical capacity examination administered to an employee who had been on a medical leave of absence was an impermissible “medical examination” under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Indergard v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., No. 08-35278 (9th Cir. Sept. 28, 2009). The Court reversed summary judgment in favor of the employer. The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction over Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
Report Link Service Animals That Provide Psychiatric Service.
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP - November 03, 2009
Last week, I posted twice on the recent controversy surrounding service animals. (See Table for Two, Please--Me and My Seeing-Eye Horse; Quit Monkeying Around: Court Rules Monkey Is Not a Service Animal). Apparently, I’m not the only one who finds the issue interesting.
Report Link Termination of Teacher After Her Complaints on Behalf of Disabled Students Can Support May Constitute ADA Retaliation.
Ogletree Deakins - November 03, 2009
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has held that a teacher’s statements on behalf of disabled students were “protected activity” under the ADA, and that the teacher had standing to sue for retaliation under the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
Report Link Quit Monkeying Around: Court Rules Monkey Is Not a Service Animal.
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP - October 27, 2009
Service animals provide assistance to persons with disabilities in a number of ways. Last week, I wrote about the seeming confusion surrounding “non-standard” service animals, like a boa constrictor and a “seeing-eye horse.” The U.S. DOJ published proposed revisions in an attempt to clarify what animals do and do not qualify as service animals for purposes of the ADA. The proposed regulations relating to service animals (PDF) would exclude the boa constrictor (and other snakes and reptiles), as well as rabbits, farm animals, ferrets, and wild animals, including monkeys born in captivity. Explaining the perceived need for the changes, the DOJ stated:
Report Link Disabled employees must provide corroborating evidence of non-obvious, medically necessary accommodations.
Ogletree Deakins - October 26, 2009
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, employers and employees are required to engage in an interactive process with respect to a disabled employee’s request for a reasonable accommodation. In cases of psychological disability - depression, for example - necessary accommodations may be non-obvious to the employer. In those cases, courts have held that in order to trigger an employer’s obligation to provide accommodation, a disabled employee must make the employer aware of any non-obvious, medically necessary accommodations by supplying corroborating evidence, such as a doctor’s note or statement. Recently, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s dismissal of a case, and found that a school failed to engage in the required interactive process after a teacher provided a doctor’s statement that linked the teacher’s Seasonal Affective Disorder depression to the lack of windows in her classroom.
Report Link EEOC’S PROPOSED ADAAA REGULATIONS.
Shaw Valenza LLP - October 23, 2009
The Americans With Disabilities Act’s (“ADA”) employment provisions became operative in 1992. Since then, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has issued hundreds of pages of regulations, technical assistance, and whitepapers. The courts have issued countless opinions interpreting the act. And employers, consultants, and doctors have implemented policies and protocols for dealing with applicants’ and employees’ requests for reasonable accommodation.
Report Link EEOC Town Hall Listening Session re: ADAAA in Philadelphia Oct. 30
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP - October 23, 2009
The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), was amended in September 2008 by the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA), which took effect on January 1, 2009. The ADAAA emphasizes that the definition of disability should be construed in favor of broad coverage of individuals to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of the ADA and generally shall not require extensive analysis. In other words, the Amendments Act expanded who qualifies as “disabled” for the purposes of the ADA’s protections. The new law makes it easier for an individual to establish that he or she has a disability within the meaning of the ADA.
Report Link The ADA at Nineteen: Footloose and Fancy Free.
Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC - October 23, 2009
Since its passage in 1990, no other federal employment law has engendered more celebration or controversy than the Americans With Disabilities Act. Like the unruly teenager it is, you can't turn your back on the ADA for a moment without the Act reasserting itself. This past month was no exception.
Report Link Table for Two, Please--Me and My Seeing-Eye Horse.
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP - October 21, 2009
I love animals. There’s no denying it. But, despite my passion for the Wild Kingdom, the stories of “unusual” service animals have me a bit perplexed. Over the last year or so, I’ve seen several stories in the news about individuals who claim that their pets should be considered service animals, thereby enabling them to take the animals places pets normally would not be allowed.
Report Link The Third Circuit Provides Guidance on Thorny FMLA and ADA Issues.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. - October 08, 2009
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s recent decision in Erdman v. Nationwide Insurance Co.1 No. 07-3796 (Sept. 23, 2009) provides much-needed guidance to employers on several Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) issues including : (1) how to analyze FMLA hours eligibility when the employee claims off-the-clock work, (2) what is considered a protected activity for purposes of an FMLA retaliation claim, and (3) how the ADA applies to employees who request leave to care for a disabled family member.

Articles

Found: 10 Articles

NO SUBTOPICS

Sort Articles   
  
Employment Law Seminars
Top Tips to Protect Your Workplace From Violence
Webinar
November 10, 2009

HR Learning Center LLC

Workplace Change in the Obama Era
Columbus
November 10, 2009

Littler

2009 Employment Practices Conference
Universal City
November 10, 2009

Ballard Rosenberg

Fall Employment Law Mini-Series
Tysons Corner
November 10, 2009

Littler

Business Continuity During the H1N1 Outbreak
Webinar
November 10, 2009

Littler

"Action Steps for Upcoming Open Enrollment" Free E-Briefing
Webinar
November 10, 2009

Ford & Harrison

Labor and Employment Law Seminar
Los Angeles
November 11, 2009

Ogletree

HR Network 2009 | Reston
Reston
November 12, 2009

Cooley

The Labor & Employment Compliance Costs of Federal Contracting
Webinar
November 12, 2009

Littler

California Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late to Comply
La Jolla
November 12, 2009

Fisher & Phillips


Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

Copyright © 2009 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.

The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.