|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Report Link Class Action Certified In Sex Bias Suit Against Wal-Mart (scroll down).Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - October 01, 2007 In Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc., the Ninth Circuit issued a revised opinion that once again affirmed a district court order granting class certification in a lawsuit alleging that Wal-Mart discriminated against female employees in both pay and promotional opportunities in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The proposed class consists of women employed by Wal-Mart in positions ranging from part-time, entry-level hourly employees to salaried managers. The class is estimated to include more than 1.5 million women. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief, backpay, and punitive damages, but not compensatory damages. The district court certified the class pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 23. Report Link Court Certifies 1.5 Million Member Class in Sex Bias Case (pdf).Ogletree Deakins - April 03, 2007 Finds Common Issues of Fact and Law Support Class Action. Report Link Ninth Circuit Affirms Certification of a Historic Class Action in Dukes V. Wal-Mart, Inc.Jackson Lewis LLP - February 28, 2007 Employers suffered a major set back when a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed the certification of a class action lawsuit against Wal-Mart. This action will include an estimated 1.5 million current and former female employees. The action asserts the company engaged in sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Wal-Mart, which denies the allegations and has contested the class designation, has vowed to ask the 11 judges of the full appeals court to reconsider the February 6, 2007 ruling and, if that fails, to seek review by the United States Supreme Court. Unless the decision is overturned, employers, particularly those in the eleven western states covered by the Ninth Circuit, face the prospect of many more class claims. Report Link Class actions update: Court certifies largest Employment class action ever (pdf).Vedder Price - October 05, 2004 On June 21, 2004, a federal court in San Francisco certified
the largest employment class action ever against the world’s
largest employer. Dukes, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
No. C 01-02252 (ND Cal). The class consists of
approximately 1.6 million women who have worked for
Wal-Mart in hourly and salaried managerial positions and
were subject to Wal-Mart’s “pay and management track
promotions policies and practices.” Report Link Dukes v. Wal-Mart: A Foreboding Class Certification Decision for Employers.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - July 06, 2004 On June 21, 2004, a federal district court in San Francisco certified a nationwide class of approximately 1.6 million current and former female employees of Wal-Mart who claim sex discrimination in promotions and pay at Wal-Mart stores around the country. Report Link Certification of Largest Class Action to Date Underscores Need for Review of Company Practices.Jackson Lewis LLP - June 24, 2004 The certification on June 22, 2004 of the largest potential class of litigants in an employment discrimination case in U. S. civil rights history is a powerful reminder that company practices must be reviewed periodically to assure compliance and avoid liability.
|
ArticlesFound: 6 ArticlesNO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
WORKPLACE VIOLENCE: STRATEGIES FOR PREVENTION
Sacramento
July 8, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLPBenefits "Q And A": Get The Benefit From Our Benefits ExpertsEast Elmhurst
2008-7-8 Queens Chamber of CommercePREVENTING HARASSMENT AND OTHER EEO ISSUES AT WORK: IT’S ALL ABOUT RESPECT (AB1825 COMPLIANCE)Eureka
July 10, 2008 Shaw ValenzaThe Connecticut Sexual and Other Harassment Education and Training in the Workplace ActNew London
2008-7-16 Jackson Lewis LLPThe Connecticut Sexual and Other Harassment Education and Training in the Workplace ActHartford
2008-7-16 Jackson Lewis LLPFree Lunchtime Webinar: Protecting Company Assets: Trade Secrets, Non-Competition, And The World Of Restrictive Covenants: Will The Courts Really Enforce These Agreements?Online
July 17, 2008 Fisher & PhillipsDealing With HR Dilemmas In The Digital AgeMelville
2008-7-17 Jackson Lewis LLPDealing With HR Dilemmas In The Digital AgeIrving
2008-7-17 Jackson Lewis LLPComplimentary Breakfast Briefing for In-House Counsel, Senior Management and HR ProfessionalsMemphis
July 22, 2008 Ford & HarrisonInternal Influences /Protecting Your Workplace From Distraction And Destruction - Part IIRiverhead
2008-7-24 Jackson Lewis LLP |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2006 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds