|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Report Link Supreme Court Limits Title VII Pay Discrimination Cases (pdf).Nexsen Pruet - July 11, 2007 On May 29, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 limits the damages an employee can recover when isolated disriminatory acts from the distant past result in disparity in the employee's current level of pay. Report Link What Hath Morgan Wrought? The New Law of Continuing Violations.Hogan & Hartson LLP - January 31, 2003 The notion of a "continuing violation" allows employment discrimination claims that would otherwise be untimely to proceed to trial. That doctrine was given a major new interpretation in June 2002 by the Supreme Court in National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan. Report Link Business Update: Supreme Court Considers The Continuing Violation Doctrine: Mixed News For Employers.Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP - June 21, 2002 The Morgan decision provides some answers, but by no means resolves the ambiguity surrounding the doctrine. The decision brings mixed news for employers. Report Link Continuing Violation Theory Overrides Time Limit for Filing Hostile Environment Charges under Title VII.Jackson Lewis LLP - June 12, 2002 In National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan, the Court was asked to decide the limits of the "continuing violation" doctrine under federal anti-discrimination law. Report Link Statute of Limitations Expanded For Hostile Environment Cases.Winston & Strawn - June 10, 2002 A charge alleging hostile work environment, however, is not time-barred if all acts constituting the claim are part of the same alleged unlawful practice and one of the acts falls within the filing period. Report Link A. Continuing Violation May Result Where Employer Maintains Potentially Discriminatory Policy.Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - November 30, 2001 Discusses California Dept. of Youth Authority, No. 99-17140 (9th Cir. November 14, 2001), in which the court reversed summary judgment in favor of the California Dept of Youth Authority in a disability discrimination/failure to hire case, in a potentially far-reaching extension of the continuing violations doctrine.
|
Articles Found: 6 ArticlesNO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
Complimentary Breakfast Briefing for In-House Counsel, Senior Management and HR Professionals
Memphis
July 22, 2008 Ford & HarrisonBehind The Complaint: Workplace InvestigationsMemphis
July 22, 2008 Ford & HarrisonInternal Influences /Protecting Your Workplace From Distraction And Destruction - Part IIRiverhead
2008-7-24 Jackson Lewis LLPI-9 & E-Verify, R-U-Ready?: Recent Developments In Immigration Recordkeeping.Online
July 24, 2008 Ford & HarrisonEmployment and Labor Law 2008: CLE Program and GolfColumbus
July 25, 2008 LittlerSection 409A: Countdown to Compliance - LiveOnline
July 30, 2008 McQuire WoodsTEXAS EMPLOYMENT LAW BREAKFAST BRIEFINGSugar Land
July 31, 2008 Phelps DunbarWinning with the EEOCAtlanta
2008-8-6 Jackson Lewis LLPMississippi Employment Law SeminarBiloxi
August 7-8, 2008 Phelps DunbarReserve the Dates!!! – Public Sexual Harassment Training Webinar for Supervisors and ManagersOnline
August 12 2008 Ballard Rosenberg |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2006 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||