|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Report Link Court Withdraws Controversial Age Bias Decision (pdf).Ogletree Deakins - June 19, 2006 Selection criteria in RIF. Report Link Supreme Court Expands Scope of Age Discrimination Law.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - April 08, 2005 On March 30, 2005, in a decision that will change the landscape of age discrimination litigation, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Smith v. City of Jackson that workers age 40 and older may prove discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) using a disparate impact theory. Report Link High Court Broadens Age Bias Claims (pdf).Ogletree Deakins - April 05, 2005 In a very divided 5-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held this morning that employees may bring
so-called “disparate impact” claims under the federal statute prohibiting age discrimination. Report Link Supreme Court Allows Disparate Impact Claims Under ADEA (pdf).Vedder Price - April 01, 2005 In a surprise ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court decided on March 30, 2005 that a claimant may establish liability under
the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) even if there is no intent to discriminate. Smith v. City
of Jackson, Mississippi, No, 03-1160. Report Link Claims of Age Discrimination Based on Disparate Impact Under the ADEA Can Be Made by Older Workers.Jackson Lewis LLP - March 31, 2005 In a decision of great significance, the U. S. Supreme Court has ruled that an individual protected by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act can sue an employer if a policy, practice or other employment action has had a disparate impact because of that individual's age. Report Link Supreme Court Again Agrees To Consider Viability of Disparate Impact Claims under the ADEA.Jackson Lewis LLP - July 20, 2004 On March 29, 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court once again agreed to consider whether disparate impact claims may be brought under the ADEA. Report Link Age Discrimination May Be Next Frontier For Employers [PDF File].Lowenstein Sandler PC - April 29, 2002 Does the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), a statute enacted three years after Title VII and modeled after Title VII, provide similar protections against a
hostile work environment or policies having a disparate impact? Report Link Supreme Court Dismisses Disparate Impact ADEA Case; Circuit Split Remains UnresolvedWinston & Strawn - April 02, 2002 In an unusual move, the U.S. Supreme Court has reversed course and dismissed a case without deciding whether disparate impact claims are permitted under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"). Adams v. Florida Power Corp., U.S., No. 01-584, (dismissed 4/1/02).
|
ArticlesFound: 8 ArticlesNO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
Reserve the Dates!!! – Public Sexual Harassment Training Webinar for Supervisors and Managers
Online
August 12 2008 Ballard RosenbergThe Connecticut Sexual and Other Harassment Education and Training in the Workplace ActWaterbury
2008-8-13 Jackson Lewis LLPStrategies For Keeping The EEOC/DFEH Away & What To Do If They Show UpSan Diego
August 13, 2008 Barker Olmsted & Barnier11th Annual Labor & Employment LawSeattle
August 14-15, 2008 The Seminar GroupPREVENTING HARASSMENT AND OTHER EEO ISSUES AT WORK: IT’S ALL ABOUT RESPECT (AB1825 COMPLIANCE)Eureka
August 14, 2008 Shaw Valenza3rd Annual Virginia Labor and Employment Law SeminarMarion
August 14, 2008 Baker DonelsonThe New Formula for Success: Eł = MC (Employees*Economy*Energy = Managing Costs)Online
August 14, 2008 LittlerFree Lunchtime Webinar: Beat The Summertime Doldrums: The Top Ten Ways To Issue-Proof Your Workplace.Online
August 15, 2008 Fisher & PhillipsPREVENTING HARASSMENT AND OTHER EEO ISSUES AT WORK: IT’S ALL ABOUT RESPECT (AB1825 COMPLIANCE)Sacramento
August 19, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLPA Health Care Providers Guide to Navigating Employment and Labor IssuesMemphis
August 20, 2008 Baker Donelson |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2006 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds