Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Seminars
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Get Our FREE Daily or Weekly Newsletter!
Email:
Over 8,300 Subscribers! More Information
Article Index » lawyering » removal
Report Link Supreme Court Ruling May Help Employers Find a More Level Playing Field in Litigation.
Jackson Lewis LLP - March 03, 2010
A U.S. Supreme Court decision may make it easier for corporate employers to avoid defending wage and hour, employment and other lawsuits in state courts, which are “home” forums to their adversaries and often are seen as favorable to plaintiffs.
Report Link In Hertz v. Friend, the U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies the Path to Federal Courts.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. - March 02, 2010
By its unanimous decision in Hertz v. Friend,1 the U.S. Supreme Court has made it more likely that a company sued in state court in a state other than where its headquarters and center of direction, control, and coordination are located, will be able to remove the case from state to federal court in that jurisdiction.
Report Link Supreme Court Clarifies When Employers Can Remove A Lawsuit From State To Federal Court.
Fisher & Phillips, LLP - February 24, 2010
On February 23, 2010 the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling clarifying when employers can remove a lawsuit from state court and have it heard in the friendlier forum of federal court. The ruling deals with what is called "diversity jurisdiction" and is seen as highly favorable for employers, particularly large employers conducting business in multiple states, because it will make it easier for companies to know when they will likely be able to avoid the jurisdiction of plaintiff-friendly state courts.
Report Link Defendant May Not Remove A State Administrative Agency Proceeding To Federal Court.
Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - May 14, 2002
The Ninth Circuit held that employers facing a state administrative agency proceeding cannot remove (i.e., transfer) the case to federal court.

Articles

Found: 4 Articles

NO SUBTOPICS

Sort Articles   
  
Employment Law Seminars
Employment Law 101 for HR Professionals
Las Vegas
March 23, 2010

Fisher & Phillips

California Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To Comply
Newport Beach
March 23, 2010

Fisher & Phillips

California Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To Comply
San Francisco
March 23, 2010

Fisher & Phillips

2010 Public Sexual Harassment Training for supervisors and managers.
Glendale
March 23, 2010

Ballard Rosenberg

2010 Employment Law Update
San Jose
March 23, 2010

Littler

How to Prepare a Response to a DFEH/EEOC Charge
Webinar
March 23, 2010

Shaw Valenza

TOP 10 TIPS FOR CREATING A BLOGGING, SOCIAL MEDIA AND CELL PHONE POLICY
Online
March 23, 2010

HR Learning Center LLC

Negotiating Your Business to the Top
Orlando
March 23, 2010

Ford & Harrison

California Legally Required Sexual Harassment Training: It's Never Too Late To Comply
San Diego
March 24, 2010

Fisher & Phillips

Employment Law Breakfast Briefings`
Kenner
March 24, 2010

Fisher & Phillips


Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

Copyright © 2010 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.

The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.