|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Report Link SOX Applied to Employee Working Overseas.Jackson Lewis LLP - May 01, 2008 As the contingent of globally-mobile employees increases, the issue of whether American law, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, applies to American employees while working overseas is receiving greater attention by the courts. Report Link Fifth Circuit Provides Guidance on Whistleblower Claims Under Sarbanes-Oxley Act.Phelps Dunbar LLP - February 05, 2008 When most people think of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, they think of a law regulating corporate governance, accounting, and financial disclosure. But public and private companies should remember that Sarbanes-Oxley is also an important employment statute. Report Link The Critical Role Of HR In Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance.Fisher & Phillips, LLP - September 05, 2007 Human Resources managers should never underestimate the importance of their role in Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. Too often, publicly-traded companies focus their Sarbanes-Oxley compliance efforts on financial reporting only, i.e., as a function of the Accounting and Legal departments. But the full participation of Human Resources can be critical in the corporation's efforts to comply with SOX. Report Link DOL's Administrative Review Board Decision Limits Whistleblower Status Under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.Jackson Lewis LLP - August 20, 2007 The case of David Welch, former Chief Financial Officer of Cardinal Bankshares (and perhaps the most well-known whistleblower under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), has taken another turn as it wends its way through the U.S. Department of Labor and court system. According to a recent ruling from the DOL's Administrative Review Board ("ARB"), allegations of accounting irregularities, in the absence of claims of fraud or violations of the securities laws, are not enough to confer whistleblower status on Welch under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Report Link DOL Clarifies Protected Activity in Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Cases.Ford & Harrison LLP - October 06, 2006 In an important decision helping to define the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) whistleblower provisions, the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB) has reversed the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), finding that an airline employee did not engage in protected activity under SOX when she complained to her employer about what the ARB described as how the “company spends its money” or its “ability to collect a debt.” See Platone v. FLYi, ARB Case. No. 04-153. The ARB’s decision provides some much needed guidance regarding what constitutes protected activity under SOX. Report Link Stage of SOX Whistleblower Proceedings May Affect Preliminary Reinstatement as Remedy.Jackson Lewis LLP - September 13, 2006 Reinstatement is one of the most significant remedies provided for by the civil whistleblower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Two decisions in 2006 have helped to define whether a successful complainant in a SOX whistleblower action can enforce a preliminary order of reinstatement by the Department of Labor. Report Link Toward The End of the French Exception?: Overcoming the Challenges of Establishing a Global "Whistleblower" Hotline.Littler Mendelson, P.C. - December 09, 2005 Publicly-traded companies covered by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("SOX") – the U.S. corporate-governance law enacted in the wake of scandals such as Enron Corp. - are required to make available to employees an anonymous whistleblower reporting system (commonly called a hotline). Report Link Administrative Judge Dismisses Sarbanes-Oxley Complaint of Employee Previously Reinstated Under Preliminary DOL Order.Jackson Lewis LLP - November 28, 2005 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act delegates enforcement authority to the Department of Labor through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Since the enactment of SOX, employers have been concerned about the broad remedial powers of OSHA to address alleged violations of the Act's whistleblower protection provision. Among others, OSHA has the power to order reinstatement of an alleged whistleblower prior to a full hearing on the merits of a case. Report Link Vice President's Reinstatement in Limbo after Law Judge Dismisses Underlying SOX Charges.Jackson Lewis LLP - November 08, 2005 Since the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), employers have been concerned about the broad remedial powers of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration for addressing alleged SOX violations. The SOX legislation delegated enforcing authority under the Act to the Department of Labor through OSHA, which has included OSHA's power to order reinstatement of an alleged whistleblower prior to a full hearing on the merits of a case. Report Link Court Strikes Whistleblower's Claims for Punitive Damages and Jury Trial Under Sarbanes-Oxley Act.Jackson Lewis LLP - August 23, 2005 Adding to the small but growing body of federal court decisions interpreting the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX Act) is a recent Texas case. The decision from the U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas is significant in that it favorably addresses questions of bottom line impact for employers: the plaintiff's right to a jury trial, and the scope of available "special damages," i.e., damages for reputational injury, exemplary and punitive damages. Report Link Court Enforces DOL Order of Reinstatement of Former Employees Under Sarbanes-Oxley.Jackson Lewis LLP - June 10, 2005 A recent federal court decision under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ordering the reinstatement of a former employee illustrates the broad remedial powers that the Act has granted to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Report Link Whistleblower Wins Reinstatement and Money Damages (pdf).Nexsen Pruet - April 15, 2005 On February 15, 2005, a U.S. Department of Labor administrative law judge (ALJ) ordered
Cardinal Bankshares Corporation to reinstate its former CFO, David Welch, even though the
company’s CEO and board of directors strongly mistrusted and disliked Welch and had
already hired another CFO to replace Welch. The ALJ also ordered Cardinal to pay Welch
$65,000 in back pay and special damages and $108,000 for attorney’s fees. Report Link Sarbanes-Oxley: lessons for private employers.Jones Walker - December 15, 2004 Imagine that you work for a private, family-run business — your family’s business. Let’s picture you as the bookkeeper and your husband (fond of red suits and ever reluctant to trim his long white beard) as the master toy craftsman and sole delivery person. With a few good hands, all of whom are very small (you provide reasonable accommodations so they can do their jobs) and like to wear funny hats and shoes (nothing obscene or violating your grooming policy — hard to complain since you allow the beard), your business is by all measures successful. Report Link Former Bank CFO Makes Case That Discharge Violated Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Provision.Jackson Lewis LLP - February 11, 2004 In reportedly the first successful whistleblower claim under the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, an administrative law judge has ruled that a former bank chief financial officer was unlawfully terminated after protesting suspected insider trading and other financial practices. Report Link OSHA Issues Revised Whistleblower Investigation Manual Detailing Procedures for Complaints Under Sarbanes-Oxley and Thirteen Other Federal Statutes.Jackson Lewis LLP - September 18, 2003 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued a revised Whistleblower Investigation Manual to provide guidance to agency staff about handling discrimination complaints under various federal statutes, including Title VIII of the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Report Link DOL Adopts Interim Final Rule Implementing Whistleblower Protection Provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley Act [PDF File, p10].Jones Walker - July 24, 2003 The proposed regulations are to be effective on the first day of the first plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2004. However, plan sponsors should make changes now to include the new tax credit information and cease using the 1986 model notice (if they have not already done so). Report Link Administrative Law Judge Decides Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblower Provision Should Not Be Applied Retroactively.Jackson Lewis LLP - March 03, 2003 A U. S. Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge has issued what appears to be the first decision under the employee protection provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Report Link Sarbanes-Oxley Act: What Employers Need to Know [PDF File].Piper Rudnick LLP - February 28, 2003 The Act includes significant implications for employers, including a requirement that by April 23, 2003, publicly traded companies develop procedures for accepting and addressing complaints regarding questionable accounting and auditing matters. Report Link The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 Employment Law Aspects - Whistleblower And Securities Analyst Protections.Thelen Reid & Priest LLP - December 30, 2002 Congress incorporated into the Act several key provisions that significantly impact the workplace and the manner in which employers may deal with their employees who help expose any wrongdoing by public companies. Report Link EMPLOYERS BEWARE: NEW WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION FOR EMPLOYEES [PDF File].Seaton, Beck, Peters, Bowen & Feuss, P.A. - October 31, 2002 In the wake of the Enron and other corporate misconduct scandals, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in July of 2002. This statute, among other changes to financial, accounting and securities law requirements, provides protection for employees of publicly traded companies who “blow the whistle” on employers. Report Link Questions and Answers about the "Sarbanes-Oxley" Whistleblower Provisions.Winston & Strawn - October 01, 2002 This Briefing answers questions regarding how the new whilstleblower provisions impact employers. Report Link Corporate Wrongdoing Legislation Gives Employees Whistleblower Protection Against Discrimination and Harassment. Jackson Lewis LLP - September 17, 2002 The corporate fraud scandals of recent months have prompted federal legislation to give added rights to employees who blow the whistle on corporate wrongdoing at publicly traded companies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, signed by President Bush on July 30, protects employees who disclose information or participate in an investigation or proceeding related to alleged violations of securities laws, SEC rules, and federal laws pertaining to shareholder fraud. Report Link Sarbanes-Oxley Act Creates Whistleblower Projection for Employees.Kilpatrick Stockton LLP - September 02, 2002 The Act creates new protections for employees of publicly traded companies who blow the whistle on securities fraud.
|
ArticlesFound: 23 ArticlesNO SUBTOPICSEmployment Law Seminars
Managing Business Exposures Successfully: Are You "All In" For The Continual Wave Of Workplace Risks?
Irving
2008-9-4 Jackson Lewis LLPTOP TEN WAYS TO VIOLATE WAGE-HOUR LAWSSacramento
September 9, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsLos Angeles
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsCosta Mesa
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsSacramento
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPUnlocking The Mystery Of Employee Privacy RightsSan Francisco
2008-9-9 Jackson Lewis LLPEmployee vs. ContractorColumbia
September 9, 2008 Nexsen PruetEmployee Free Choice Act: Labor’s Attack on Your Employees’ Right to ChooseOnline
September 9, 2008 McGuire WoodsThe Connecticut Sexual and Other Harassment Education and Training in the Workplace ActStamford
2008-9-10 Jackson Lewis LLPHOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONSSan Francisco
September 11, 2008 Shaw Valenza LLP |
|
| ||
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy
|
Advertising
|
About
|
Contact
|
For Law Firms
|
Partners
Copyright © 2006 elinfonet.com, llc.
All Rights Reserved.
The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.
This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations. As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law. None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice. The information should not be relied upon for legal advice. We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created. Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege. If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area. If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association. All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners. | ||
Federal Article Feeds