Employment Law Information Network
Google
 
Web www.elinfonet.com
Main Navigation
Federal Law Articles
State Law Articles
HR Newsletter
HR Guidebook
HR Policy
HR Forms
HR Seminars
Employment Contracts
Employment Law Forums
Employment Law Blog
Employment Laws
Employee Rights
Workplace Headlines
Federal Article Feeds Federal Article Feeds
State Article Feeds State Article Feeds
Enter Your Email Address Below!

Daily Weekly  [More Information]
Article Index » human resources » privacy and surveillance » General
Report Link Employee Privacy Update: Review Of Employee Text Messages Deemed Invasion Of Privacy.
Barker Olmsted & Barnier - July 11, 2008
Workplace privacy rights can be tricky. Consider the following scenario: A company provides two-way alpha-numeric pagers to employees. The pager service plan allows for transmission of 25,000 characters per month, beyond which an overage fee is assessed.
Report Link Employee Text Messages Are Not Inviolate: Understanding and Navigating the Ninth Circuit's Decision in Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Company
Littler Mendelson, P.C. - July 09, 2008
The headlines proclaiming the end of employer monitoring have vastly overstated the impact on the workplace of the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Company. To be sure, the case holds that the Stored Communications Act prohibits third-party service providers, such as text message services and Internet service providers, from disclosing stored electronic communications without the consent of the employee who sends or receives the communication, even if the employee is using employer-provided equipment and the employer pays for the service. Nonetheless, and as explained more fully below, employers can easily and lawfully navigate this restriction.
Report Link Employees Have Right to Privacy in Text Messages, Court of Appeals Rules.
Jackson Lewis LLP - July 01, 2008
A police officer and the individuals with whom he communicated had a reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages sent from pagers provided by the employer, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled. Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc., No. 07-55282 (9th Cir. June 18, 2008). The employer, it said, violated the plaintiffs' rights under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the California Constitution by reviewing text messages without the plaintiffs' consent. Accordingly, the court held that the plaintiffs prevailed as a matter of law and reversed the lower court's judgment in favor of the employer. The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction over Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
Report Link Review of Employee Text Messages Deemed Invasion of Privacy
Barker Olmsted & Barnier - June 24, 2008
Employers may violate constitutional privacy rights by reviewing employee text messages delivered on company-provided equipment, according to a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Report Link Navigating the Personal Information Maze (pdf).
Jackson Lewis LLP - June 23, 2008
It’s all in a day’s work: employers collect individuals’ most sensitive and private personal information. From Social Security numbers to fingerprints, health records to financial data, this information enters the province of employers for use in the normal course of business. Dramatic headlines have spotlighted the vulnerability of this personal data and the potential for liability if it is not secure. Inadvertent data loss, security breaches, unauthorized disclosures, and theft have led governments worldwide to enact laws and regulations designed to balance legitimate business needs for sensitive personal information with individual interests in keeping it safe.
Report Link International Personal Information Flow, Privacy, and Security.
Jackson Lewis LLP - June 03, 2008
Employers must consider the requirements of international privacy laws when transferring employees’ personal information across national borders, even if within the same company. Dramatic and frequent headlines of inadvertent data loss, security breaches, unauthorized disclosures, and theft have put a spotlight on the vulnerability of data repositories. Predictably, governments worldwide have enacted laws and regulations designed to balance legitimate business needs for personal information with individual interests in keeping that information safe.
Report Link International Business Travelers May Face Warrantless Laptop Searches by U.S. Border Agents.
Jackson Lewis LLP - May 12, 2008
Federal border agents did not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches in examining the contents of a traveler’s laptop without any basis for believing the device contains contraband, a federal appeals court in San Francisco has ruled. United States v. Arnold, No. 06-50581 (9th Cir. Apr. 21, 2008). The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction over Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
Report Link Liability for Data Security Breaches Expanding (pdf).
Vedder Price - May 02, 2007
On January 17, 2007, a computer hacker accessed the computer systems of TJX Companies, Inc., a parent company of T.J. Maxx, Marshall’s and other retailers, and stole sensitive and confidential information communicated during customer transactions dating back to 2003. Fraudulent use of this stolen information has thus far been detected in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Hong Kong and Sweden. As a result of this incident, numerous class actions have been fi led against TJX on behalf of consumers whose information was stolen.
Report Link Bills Banning "Pretexting" And Protecting Veteran Data Clear Congress.
Jackson Lewis LLP - December 21, 2006
Two privacy and data security measures affecting employers received legislative approval as the 109 th Congress draws to a close. One measure would criminalize certain corporate investigative methods. The other measure would require data security provisions be included in contracts between the Veterans Administration and private sector service providers.
Report Link Employer's Unauthorized Access To Employee's Website May Violate Federal Statute.
Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt - September 01, 2002
The Ninth Circuit ordered a jury trial where an employer's alleged use of false pretenses to access an employee's website violated the federal Stored Communications Act, which prohibits unauthorized access to an "electronic communication service."
Report Link Balancing Property and Privacy Interests in the Modern Workplace [PDF File].
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP. - June 15, 2002
In today’s workplace, employees use e-mail, voicemail, companywide computer systems, the Internet, and other company property in performing their everyday tasks. * * * Unfortunately, employees do not always use company property in an appropriate manner.
Report Link Surveillance Video and Report Not Required to Comply with FRCA [PDF File].
O'Melveny & Myers LLP - April 01, 2001
Discusses Salazar v. Golden State Warriors, __ F.Supp.2d __ (N.D. Ca. November 9,2000), in which the court held that a surveillance video of, and accompanying report about, an employee prepared by a private investigation firm falls outside the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Report Link Secret Tape Recordings in the Workplace–The Linda Tripp Phenomenon [PDF File].
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP. - February 22, 1999
Lengthy discussion regarding the legality of secret tape recording in the workplace.
Report Link workplace privacy: four key principles to follow.
Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. - January 01, 1997
Provides tips for employers to ensure that they do not violate employee privacy rights.

Articles

Found: 14 Articles

NO SUBTOPICS

Sort Articles   
  
Employment Law Seminars

Terms of Use  |  Privacy  |  Advertising  |  About  |  Contact  |  For Law Firms  |  Partners

The use of this site, and the terms and conditions for our providing information, is governed by our Terms of Use, including the disclaimers contained therein. By using this site, you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms thereof.

This site is designed for lawyers concentrating in employment law and human resource professionals who specialize in employee relations.  As more fully set forth in the terms of use, the information provided on or through this site is for general information purposes; it is not a determination of your legal rights, nor your responsibilities under the law.  None of the information contained on this site is, or should be construed as, legal advice.  The information should not be relied upon for legal advice.  We are not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney-client relationship is being created.  Any information communicated to any lawyer via this site does not have the confidentiality protection of the attorney/client privilege.  If you are seeking legal advice, find a qualified lawyer in your area.  If you need help finding a lawyer, call your local, county or state bar association.

All logos and trademarks on this site are property of their respective owners.